Cited by 260SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchAnimal Virus Infections Studies

Structures of MERS-CoV spike glycoprotein in complex with sialoside attachment receptors

Open access
Park, Young-Jun, Walls, Alexandra C., Wang, Zhaoqian, Sauer, Maximillian M., Li, Wentao, Tortorici, M. Alejandra, Bosch, Berend-Jan, DiMaio, Frank +1 more·2019·Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Abstract

The Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) causes severe and often lethal respiratory illness in humans, and no vaccines or specific treatments are available. Infections are initiated via binding of the MERS-CoV spike (S) glycoprotein to sialosides and dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (the attachment and entry receptors, respectively). To understand MERS-CoV engagement of sialylated receptors, we determined the cryo-EM structures of S in complex with 5-N-acetyl neuraminic acid, 5-N-glycolyl neuraminic acid, sialyl-Lewis X, α2,3-sialyl-N-acetyl-lactosamine and α2,6-sialyl-N-acetyl-lactosamine at 2.7-3.0 Å resolution. We show that recognition occurs via a conserved groove that is essential for MERS-CoV S-mediated attachment to sialosides and entry into human airway epithelial cells. Our data illuminate MERS-CoV S sialoside specificity and suggest that selectivity for α2,3-linked over α2,6-linked receptors results from enhanced interactions with the former class of oligosaccharides. This study provides a structural framework explaining MERS-CoV attachment to sialoside receptors and identifies a site of potential vulnerability to inhibitors of viral entry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41594-019-0334-7

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • New SARS-CoV-2 variants are found and predicted to exploit a cellular attachment-promoting factor to increase infection and transmission efficiency in ACE2 cells of the upper respiratory tract.

    “The new variants are found and predicted to exploit a cellular attachment promoting factor to increase the variant’s efficiency in terms of both infection and transmission to infect ACE2 cells in the upper respiratory tract [13].”

    From Waves and variants of SARS-CoV-2: understanding the causes and effect of the COVID-19 catastrophe (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Results (page unavailable) show that sialoside attachment promotes MERS-CoV spike-mediated entry into human airway cells. The Discussion (page unavailable) suggests that this attachment may facilitate binding to DPP4. The paper does not establish the claim about new SARS-CoV-2 variants, ACE2 cells, or increased transmission efficiency. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, Y.-J., Walls, A. C., Wang, Z., Sauer, M. M., Li, W., Tortorici, M. A., Bosch, B.-J., DiMaio, F., & Veesler, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Veesler, David
Venue
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Published
2019-12
Volume
26
Issue
12
Pages
1151-1157
ISSN
  • 1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9993
OpenAlex
W2995902735
Cited by
260
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 1
FWCI
37.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  • University of Washington
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM120553, R01GM123089)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN272201700059C)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
Keywords
MERS-CoV, spike protein, dipeptidyl peptidase IV, viral attachment, receptor specificity, α2,3-linked sialic acid, α2,6-linked sialic acid, sialyl Lewis X, N-acetylneuraminic acid, viral entry inhibitors
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Binding Sites, Carbohydrate Conformation, Hemagglutination, Viral, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Sialic Acids, Structure-Activity Relationship, Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Protein Interaction Mapping, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review