Cited by 16Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrated model of the vertebrate augmin complex

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Accurate segregation of chromosomes is required to maintain genome integrity during cell division. This feat is accomplished by the microtubule-based spindle. To build a spindle rapidly and with high fidelity, cells take advantage of branching microtubule nucleation, which rapidly amplifies microtubules during cell division. Branching microtubule nucleation relies on the hetero-octameric augmin complex, but lack of structure information about augmin has hindered understanding how it promotes branching. In this work, we combine cryo-electron microscopy, protein structural prediction, and visualization of fused bulky tags via negative stain electron microscopy to identify the location and orientation of each subunit within the augmin structure. Evolutionary analysis shows that augmin’s structure is highly conserved across eukaryotes, and that augmin contains a previously unidentified microtubule binding site. Thus, our findings provide insight into the mechanism of branching microtubule nucleation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-023-37519-4

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Salmon, E. D., Leslie, R. J., Saxton, W. M., Karow, M. L. & McIntosh, J. R. Spindle microtubule dynamics in sea urchin embryos: analysis using a fluorescein-labeled tubulin and measurements of fluorescence redistribution after laser photobleaching. J. Cell Biol. 99, 2165–2174 (1984). · DOI
  2. Mirny, L. A. & Needleman, D. J. Quantitative characterization of filament dynamics by single-molecule lifetime measurements. Methods Cell Biol. 95, 583–600 (2010).
  3. Hoffmann, I. Centrosomes in mitotic spindle assembly and orientation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 66, 193–198 (2021). · DOI
  4. Wu, J. & Akhmanova, A. Microtubule-organizing centers. Annu Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 33, 51–75 (2017). · DOI
  5. Meunier, S. & Vernos, I. Acentrosomal microtubule assembly in mitosis: The where, when, and how. Trends Cell Biol. 26, 80–87 (2016). · DOI
  6. Petry, S. Mechanisms of mitotic spindle assembly. Annu Rev. Biochem 85, 659–683 (2016). · DOI
  7. Brugues, J., Nuzzo, V., Mazur, E. & Needleman, D. J. Nucleation and transport organize microtubules in metaphase spindles. Cell 149, 554–564 (2012). · DOI
  8. Clausen, T. & Ribbeck, K. Self-organization of anastral spindles by synergy of dynamic instability, autocatalytic microtubule production, and a spatial signaling gradient. PLoS One 2, e244 (2007). · DOI
  9. Loughlin, R., Heald, R. & Nedelec, F. A computational model predicts Xenopus meiotic spindle organization. J. Cell Biol. 191, 1239–1249 (2010). · DOI
  10. Chan, J., Sambade, A., Calder, G. & Lloyd, C. Arabidopsis cortical microtubules are initiated along, as well as branching from, existing microtubules. Plant Cell 21, 2298–2306 (2009). · DOI
  11. Murata, T. et al. Microtubule-dependent microtubule nucleation based on recruitment of gamma-tubulin in higher plants. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 961–968 (2005). · DOI
  12. Petry, S., Groen, A. C., Ishihara, K., Mitchison, T. J. & Vale, R. D. Branching microtubule nucleation in Xenopus egg extracts mediated by augmin and TPX2. Cell 152, 768–777 (2013). · DOI
  13. Goshima, G., Mayer, M., Zhang, N., Stuurman, N. & Vale, R. D. Augmin: a protein complex required for centrosome-independent microtubule generation within the spindle. J. Cell Biol. 181, 421–429 (2008). · DOI
  14. Lawo, S. et al. HAUS, the 8-subunit human Augmin complex, regulates centrosome and spindle integrity. Curr. Biol. 19, 816–826 (2009). · DOI
  15. Petry, S., Pugieux, C., Nedelec, F. J. & Vale, R. D. Augmin promotes meiotic spindle formation and bipolarity in Xenopus egg extracts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 14473–14478 (2011). · DOI
  16. Uehara, R. & Goshima, G. Functional central spindle assembly requires de novo microtubule generation in the interchromosomal region during anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 191, 259–267 (2010). · DOI
  17. Alfaro-Aco, R., Thawani, A. & Petry, S. Biochemical reconstitution of branching microtubule nucleation. Elife 9, e49797 (2020). · DOI
  18. Tariq, A., Green, L., Jeynes, J. C. G., Soeller, C. & Wakefield, J. G. In vitro reconstitution of branching microtubule nucleation. Elife 9, e49769 (2020). · DOI
  19. Zhang, Y., Hong, X., Hua, S. & Jiang, K. Reconstitution and mechanistic dissection of the human microtubule branching machinery. J. Cell Biol. 221, e202109053 (2022). · DOI
  20. Song, J. G. et al. Mechanism of how augmin directly targets the gamma-tubulin ring complex to microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 217, 2417–2428 (2018). · DOI
  21. Uehara, R. et al. The augmin complex plays a critical role in spindle microtubule generation for mitotic progression and cytokinesis in human cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 6998–7003 (2009). · DOI
  22. Ho, C. M. et al. Augmin plays a critical role in organizing the spindle and phragmoplast microtubule arrays in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 23, 2606–2618 (2011). · DOI
  23. Hsia, K. C. et al. Reconstitution of the augmin complex provides insights into its architecture and function. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 852–863 (2014). · DOI
  24. Rale, M. J., Romer, B., Mahon, B. P., Travis, S. M. & Petry, S. The conserved centrosomin motif, gammaTuNA, forms a dimer that directly activates microtubule nucleation by the gamma-tubulin ring complex (gammaTuRC). Elife 11, e80053 (2022). · DOI
  25. Dodonova, S. O. et al. VESICULAR TRANSPORT. A structure of the COPI coat and the role of coat proteins in membrane vesicle assembly. Science 349, 195–198 (2015). · DOI
  26. Evans R. et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  27. Fontana, P. et al. Structure of cytoplasmic ring of nuclear pore complex by integrative cryo-EM and AlphaFold. Science 376, eabm9326 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Holm, L. Dali server: structural unification of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, W210–W215 (2022). · DOI
  29. Ha, J. Y. et al. Molecular architecture of the complete COG tethering complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 758–760 (2016). · DOI
  30. Ciferri, C. et al. Molecular architecture of human polycomb repressive complex 2. Elife 1, e00005 (2012). · DOI
  31. Wu, G. et al. Hice1, a novel microtubule-associated protein required for maintenance of spindle integrity and chromosomal stability in human cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 28, 3652–3662 (2008). · DOI
  32. Chen, J. W. C. et al. Cross-linking mass spectrometry identifies new interfaces of Augmin required to localise the gamma-tubulin ring complex to the mitotic spindle. Biol. Open 6, 654–663 (2017).
  33. Bucciarelli, E. et al. Drosophila Dgt6 interacts with Ndc80, Msps/XMAP215, and gamma-tubulin to promote kinetochore-driven MT formation. Curr. Biol. 19, 1839–1845 (2009). · DOI
  34. Edzuka, T., Yamada, L., Kanamaru, K., Sawada, H. & Goshima, G. Identification of the augmin complex in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans. PLoS One 9, e101471 (2014). · DOI
  35. Gabel, C. A. et al. Molecular architecture of the augmin complex. Nat. Commun. 13, 5449 (2022). · DOI
  36. Zupa, E. et al. The augmin complex architecture reveals structural insights into microtubule branching. Nat. Commun. 13, 5635 (2022). · DOI
  37. Hayashi, I. & Ikura, M. Crystal structure of the amino-terminal microtubule-binding domain of end-binding protein 1 (EB1). J. Biol. Chem. 278, 36430–36434 (2003). · DOI
  38. Schou, K. B., Andersen, J. S. & Pedersen, L. B. A divergent calponin homology (NN-CH) domain defines a novel family: implications for evolution of ciliary IFT complex B proteins. Bioinformatics 30, 899–902 (2014). · DOI
  39. Safari, M. S., King, M. R., Brangwynne, C. P. & Petry, S. Interaction of spindle assembly factor TPX2 with importins-alpha/beta inhibits protein phase separation. J. Biol. Chem. 297, 100998 (2021). · DOI
  40. Schatz, C. A. et al. Importin alpha-regulated nucleation of microtubules by TPX2. EMBO J. 22, 2060–2070 (2003). · DOI
  41. Alushin, G. M. et al. The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms oligomeric arrays along microtubules. Nature 467, 805–810 (2010). · DOI
  42. Ding, B. et al. Structure of Arp2/3 complex at a branched actin filament junction resolved by single-particle cryo-electron microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2202723119 (2022). · DOI
  43. Fassler, F., Dimchev, G., Hodirnau, V. V., Wan, W. & Schur, F. K. M. Cryo-electron tomography structure of Arp2/3 complex in cells reveals new insights into the branch junction. Nat. Commun. 11, 6437 (2020). · DOI
  44. Verma, V. & Maresca, T. J. Direct observation of branching MT nucleation in living animal cells. J. Cell Biol. 218, 2829–2840 (2019). · DOI
  45. Hyman, A. et al. Preparation of modified tubulins. Methods Enzymol. 196, 478–485 (1991). · DOI
  46. Bieling, P., Telley, I. A., Hentrich, C., Piehler, J. & Surrey, T. Fluorescence microscopy assays on chemically functionalized surfaces for quantitative imaging of microtubule, motor, and +TIP dynamics. Methods Cell Biol. 95, 555–580 (2010). · DOI
  47. Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  48. Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. Elife 7, e42166 (2018). · DOI
  49. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  50. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004). · DOI
  51. Ashkenazy, H. et al. ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W344–W350 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  52. Boratyn, G. M. et al. Domain enhanced lookup time accelerated BLAST. Biol. Direct 7, 12 (2012). · DOI
  53. Eddy, S. R. Accelerated Profile HMM Searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002195 (2011). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Travis, S. M., Mahon, B. P., Huang, W., Ma, M., Rale, M. J., Kraus, J., Taylor, D. J., Zhang, R., & Petry, S.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Rui
  • Petry, Sabine
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2023-04-13
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
2072-2072
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4365447709
Cited by
16
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (F32GM142149, 1R01GM138854, 1R01GM141100-01A1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
microtubule-binding site, mitotic spindle assembly, chromosome segregation, protein structure, evolutionary conservation
MeSH terms
Animals, Binding Sites, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Microtubules, Spindle Apparatus, Tubulin, Vertebrates, Cryoelectron Microscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review