Accurate prediction of protein assembly structure by combining AlphaFold and symmetrical docking
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
AlphaFold can predict the structures of monomeric and multimeric proteins with high accuracy but has a limit on the number of chains and residues it can fold. Here we show that a combination of AlphaFold and all-atom symmetric docking simulations enables highly accurate prediction of the structure of complex symmetrical assemblies. We present a method to predict the structure of complexes with cubic - tetrahedral, octahedral and icosahedral - symmetry from sequence. Focusing on proteins where AlphaFold can make confident predictions on the subunit structure, 27 cubic systems were assembled with a median TM-score of 0.99 and a DockQ score of 0.72. 21 had TM-scores of above 0.9 and were categorized as acceptable- to high-quality according to DockQ. The resulting models are energetically optimized and can be used for detailed studies of intermolecular interactions in higher-order symmetrical assemblies. The results demonstrate how explicit treatment of structural symmetry can significantly expand the size and complexity of AlphaFold predictions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Preliminary reports suggest AF2 may predict oligomeric states of proteins and amyloids.
“Preliminary reports also suggest that AF2 may also be able to predict oligomeric states of proteins and amyloids17,57”
From The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins (2024) · cites this paper as [57]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Berman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196 · see citing works
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320 · see citing works
Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences
Li, W.-Z., & Godzik, A. (2006) · Bioinform. · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · Cited by 10,994 · see citing works
EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite.
Rice, P., Longden, I., & Bleasby, A. (2000) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02024-2 · Cited by 9,466 · see citing works
ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL.
Monod, J., Wyman, J., & Changeux, J. (1965) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(65)80285-6 · Cited by 7,681 · see citing works
Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer
Evans, R., O’Neill, M., Pritzel, A., Antropova, N., Senior, A., Green, T., Žídek, A., Bates, R., Blackwell, S., Yim, J., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · Cited by 3,808 · see citing works
Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality
Zhang, Y., & Skolnick, J. (2004) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20264 · Cited by 2,392 · see citing works
The Rosetta All-Atom Energy Function for Macromolecular Modeling and Design
Alford, R. F., Leaver-Fay, A., Jeliazkov, J. R., O’Meara, M. J., DiMaio, F. P., Park, H., Shapovalov, M. V., Renfrew, P. D., Mulligan, V. K., Kappel, K., et al. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00125 · Cited by 1,532 · see citing works
Mariani, V., Biasini, M., Barbato, A., & Schwede, T. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · Cited by 1,138 · see citing works
Structural Symmetry and Protein Function
Goodsell, D. S., & Olson, A. J. (2000) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.105 · Cited by 950 · see citing works
Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks
Leman, J. K., Weitzner, B. D., Lewis, S. M., Adolf-Bryfogle, J., Alam, N., Alford, R. F., Aprahamian, M., Baker, D., Barlow, K. A., Barth, P., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0848-2 · Cited by 888 · see citing works
PyRosetta: a script-based interface for implementing molecular modeling algorithms using Rosetta
Chaudhury, S., Lyskov, S., & Gray, J. J. (2010) · Bioinform. · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq007 · Cited by 772 · see citing works
Crick, F. H. C., & Watson, J. D. (1956) · Nature · doi:10.1038/177473a0 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
Park, H., Bradley, P. H., Greisen, P. J., Liu, Y., Mulligan, V. K., Kim, D. E., Baker, D. A., & DiMaio, F. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00819 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
DockQ: A Quality Measure for Protein-Protein Docking Models
Basu, S., & Wallner, B. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161879 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Automated structure refinement of macromolecular assemblies from cryo-EM maps using Rosetta
Wang, R. Y.-R., Song, Y., Barad, B. A., Cheng, Y., Fraser, J. S., & DiMaio, F. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.17219 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Structure, Dynamics, Assembly, and Evolution of Protein Complexes
Marsh, J. A., & Teichmann, S. A. (2014) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034142 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Alternate States of Proteins Revealed by Detailed Energy Landscape Mapping
Tyka, M. D., Keedy, D. A., André, I., DiMaio, F., Song, Y., Richardson, D. C., Richardson, J. S., & Baker, D. A. (2010) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.11.008 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Self-citationBenchmarking <scp>AlphaFold</scp> for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants
Yin, R., Feng, B. Y., Varshney, A., & Pierce, B. G. (2022) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4379 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Benchmarking AlphaFold for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants
Yin, R., Feng, B. Y., Varshney, A., & Pierce, B. G. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.23.465575 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Modeling Symmetric Macromolecular Structures in Rosetta3
DiMaio, F., Leaver‐Fay, A., Bradley, P. H., Baker, D. A., & André, I. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020450 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Self-citationMukherjee, S., & Zhang, Y. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp318 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Prediction of the structure of symmetrical protein assemblies
André, I., Bradley, P. H., Wang, C., & Baker, D. A. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702626104 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Self-citationEfficient flexible backbone protein-protein docking for challenging targets
Marze, N. A., Roy Burman, S. S., Sheffler, W., & Gray, J. J. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty355 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Principles of Virus Structural Organization
Prasad, B. V. V., & Schmid, M. F. (2011) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0980-9_3 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
(2011) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2644 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Structure of viruses: a short history
Rossmann, M. G. (2013) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583513000012 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Progress at protein structure prediction, as seen in CASP15
Elofsson, A. (2023) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102594 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Improved Docking of Protein Models by a Combination of Alphafold2 and ClusPro
Ghani, U., Desta, I., Jindal, A., Khan, O., Jones, G., Hashemi, N., Kotelnikov, S., Padhorny, D., Vajda, S., & Kozakov, D. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.07.459290 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Improved multimer prediction using massive sampling with <scp>AlphaFold</scp> in <scp>CASP15</scp>
Wallner, B. (2023) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26562 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Improved Multimer Prediction using Massive Sampling with AlphaFold in CASP15
Wallner, B. (2023) · doi:10.22541/au.168170986.60158084/v1 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Protein sequence‐to‐structure learning: Is this the end(‐to‐end revolution)?
Laine, E., Eismann, S., Elofsson, A., & Grudinin, S. (2021) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26235 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Icosahedral virus structures and the protein data bank
Johnson, J. E., & Olson, A. J. (2021) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100554 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
The resolution revolution in X-ray diffraction, Cryo-EM and other Technologies
Blundell, T. L., & Chaplin, A. K. (2021) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2021.01.003 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Flexible backbone assembly and refinement of symmetrical homomeric complexes
Roy Burman, S. S., Yovanno, R. A., & Gray, J. J. (2019) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2019.03.014 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Varela, D., Karlin, V., & André, I. (2022) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2022.09.005 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationAsymmetry in icosahedral viruses
Jose, J., & Hafenstein, S. L. (2022) · Current Opinion in Virology · doi:10.1016/j.coviro.2022.101230 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [40]Jeppesen, M. & Andre, I. Accurate prediction of protein assembly structure by combining AlphaFold and symmetrical docking, EvoDOCK.10.5281/zenodo.10119213 (2023). PMC10719378 38092742 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins
Agarwal, V., & McShan, A. C. (2024) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-024-01638-w · Cited by 155 · see citing works
“Preliminary reports also suggest that AF2 may also be able to predict oligomeric states of proteins and amyloids 17,57 .”
BackgroundPredictomes, a classifier-curated database of AlphaFold-modeled protein-protein interactions
Schmid, E. W., & Walter, J. C. (2025) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2025.01.034 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
“While many studies have examined AF-M’s ability to correctly predict structures in curated PPI databases 25–27 , there has been less focus on separating true from false interactions in large-scale unbiased screens.”
- Authors
- Jeppesen, M., & André, I.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- André, Ingemar
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2023-12-13
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8283-8283
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10719378
- OpenAlex
- W4389686140
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (HORIZON2020, 771820)
- Lunds Universitet
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- AlphaFold, cubic symmetry, tetrahedral symmetry, octahedral symmetry, icosahedral symmetry, structural symmetry, multimeric proteins, TM-score, intermolecular interactions
- MeSH terms
- Protein Conformation, Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review