Cited by 80Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

CEA-CD3 bispecific antibody cibisatamab with or without atezolizumab in patients with CEA-positive solid tumours: results of two multi-institutional Phase 1 trials

Open access
Segal, Neil H., Melero, Ignacio, Moreno, Victor, Steeghs, Neeltje, Marabelle, Aurelien, Rohrberg, Kristoffer, Rodriguez-Ruiz, Maria E., Eder, Joseph P. +16 more·2024·Nature Communications

Abstract

Cibisatamab is a bispecific antibody-based construct targeting carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) on tumour cells and CD3 epsilon chain as a T-cell engager. Here we evaluated cibisatamab for advanced CEA-positive solid tumours in two open-label Phase 1 dose-escalation and -expansion studies: as a single agent with or without obinutuzumab in S1 (NCT02324257) and with atezolizumab in S2 (NCT02650713). Primary endpoints were safety, dose finding, and pharmacokinetics in S1; safety and dose finding in S2. Secondary endpoints were anti-tumour activity (including overall response rate, ORR) and pharmacodynamics in S1; anti-tumour activity, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in S2. S1 and S2 enrolled a total of 149 and 228 patients, respectively. Grade ≥3 cibisatamab-related adverse events occurred in 36% of S1 and 49% of S2 patients. The ORR was 4% in S1 and 7% in S2. In S2, patients with microsatellite stable colorectal carcinoma (MSS-CRC) given flat doses of cibisatamab and atezolizumab demonstrated an ORR of 14%. In S1 and S2, 40% and 52% of patients, respectively, developed persistent anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). ADA appearance could be mitigated by obinutuzumab-pretreatment, with 8% of patients having persistent ADAs. Overall, cibisatamab warrants further exploration in immunotherapy combination strategies for MSS-CRC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-024-48479-8

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bispecific T cell engagers provide a potential additional tool to direct immune cells into immune-cold tumours and could be combined with other forms of immunotherapy.

    “These antibodies include bispecific T cell engagers (reviewed in9698) that provide a potential additional tool to direct immune cells into immune-cold tumours and could be combined with other forms of immunotherapies.99”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Segal, N. H., Melero, I., Moreno, V., Steeghs, N., Marabelle, A., Rohrberg, K., Rodriguez-Ruiz, M. E., Eder, J. P., Eng, C., Manji, G. A., Waterkamp, D., Leutgeb, B., Bouseida, S., Flinn, N., Das Thakur, M., Elze, M. C., Koeppen, H., Jamois, C., Martin-Facklam, M., Lieu, C. H., Calvo, E., Paz-Ares, L., Tabernero, J., & Argilés, G.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES)
  • Yale Cancer Center (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Genentech (US)
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
  • University of Colorado Denver (US)
  • Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES)
  • Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (ES)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Segal, Neil H.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2024-05-15
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
4091-4091
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396934258
Cited by
80
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 6
FWCI
13.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
F Hoffmann-La Roche
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Keywords
bispecific antibodies, T-cell engagers, carcinoembryonic antigen, CD3, atezolizumab, obinutuzumab, anti-drug antibodies, dose escalation, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, antitumour activity, adverse events
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, CD3 Complex, Antibodies, Bispecific, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review