Cited by 75Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and DynamicsReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Structure prediction of protein-ligand complexes from sequence information with Umol

Open access
Bryant, Patrick, Kelkar, Atharva, Guljas, Andrea, Clementi, Cecilia, Noé, Frank·2024·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Protein-ligand docking is an established tool in drug discovery and development to narrow down potential therapeutics for experimental testing. However, a high-quality protein structure is required and often the protein is treated as fully or partially rigid. Here we develop an AI system that can predict the fully flexible all-atom structure of protein-ligand complexes directly from sequence information. We find that classical docking methods are still superior, but depend upon having crystal structures of the target protein. In addition to predicting flexible all-atom structures, predicted confidence metrics (plDDT) can be used to select accurate predictions as well as to distinguish between strong and weak binders. The advances presented here suggest that the goal of AI-based drug discovery is one step closer, but there is still a way to go to grasp the complexity of protein-ligand interactions fully. Umol is available at: https://github.com/patrickbryant1/Umol .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-024-48837-6

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bryant, P., Kelkar, A., Guljas, A., Clementi, C., & Noé, F.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Bryant, Patrick
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2024-05-28
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
4536-4536
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399070999
Cited by
75
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 1
FWCI
15.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • European Commission (ERC CoG 772230)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1114 porjects A04 and C03, RTG 2433 Project Q04, SFB/TRR 186 Project A12)
  • Einstein Stiftung Berlin (0420815101)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
protein-ligand docking, sequence-based structure prediction, protein flexibility
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Ligands, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Drug Discovery, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review