Cited by 49Microbial Community Ecology and PhysiologyMarine Plankton and BiogeochemistryMarine Biology and Ecology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global biogeography of microbes driving ocean ecological status under climate change

Open access

Abstract

Microbial communities play a crucial role in ocean ecology and global biogeochemical processes. However, understanding the intricate interactions among diversity, taxonomical composition, functional traits, and how these factors respond to climate change remains a significant challenge. Here, we propose seven distinct ecological statuses by systematically considering the diversity, structure, and biogeochemical potential of the ocean microbiome to delineate their biogeography. Anthropogenic climate change is expected to alter the ecological status of the surface ocean by influencing environmental conditions, particularly nutrient and oxygen contents. Our predictive model, which utilizes machine learning, indicates that the ecological status of approximately 32.44% of the surface ocean may undergo changes from the present to the end of this century, assuming no policy interventions. These changes mainly include poleward shifts in the main taxa, increases in photosynthetic carbon fixation and decreases in nutrient metabolism. However, this proportion can decrease significantly with effective control of greenhouse gas emissions. Our study underscores the urgent necessity for implementing policies to mitigate climate change, particularly from an ecological perspective.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-024-49124-0

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Halomonas sp. mitigates arsenic toxicity by oxidizing As3+ to the less toxic As6+, thereby aiding in soil detoxification and improving rice growth.

    “For instance, Halomonas sp.mitigates arsenic toxicity by oxidizing As 3 ⁺ to the less toxic As⁶⁺, thereby aiding in soil detoxification and improving rice growth [400,404].”

    From Harnessing bacterial consortia for effective bioremediation: targeted removal of heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants (2025) · cites this paper as [404]

    The Methods section describes marker genes for photosynthesis, carbon fixation, nitrogen metabolism, and sulfur metabolism in ocean microbes. Searches for Halomonas, arsenic oxidation, soil detoxification, and rice growth found no passage addressing the claimed mechanism or outcome. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Exopolysaccharide-producing Bacillus strains are highly effective in adsorbing cadmium and lead from contaminated soils, enhancing plant growth while reducing heavy metal bioavailability.

    “Exopolysaccharide-producing Bacillus strains have proven highly effective in adsorbing cadmium and lead from contaminated soils, enhancing plant growth while reducing heavy metal bioavailability [400,404].”

    From Harnessing bacterial consortia for effective bioremediation: targeted removal of heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants (2025) · cites this paper as [404]

    The Results passages concern ocean microbial communities and their biogeochemical potential, not Bacillus treatment of contaminated soils. Searches for exopolysaccharide-producing Bacillus, cadmium and lead adsorption, plant growth, and heavy-metal bioavailability found no passage addressing the claim. No page numbers were provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Sommeria-Klein, G. et al. Global drivers of eukaryotic plankton biogeography in the sunlit ocean. Science 374, 594–599 (2021). · DOI
  2. Sunagawa, S. et al. Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science 348, 1261359 (2015). · DOI
  3. Ibarbalz, F. M. et al. Global trends in marine plankton diversity across kingdoms of life. Cell 179, 1084–1097.e1021 (2019). · DOI
  4. Hoshino, T. et al. Global diversity of microbial communities in marine sediment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 117, 27587–27597 (2020). · DOI
  5. Cohen, N. R. et al. Dinoflagellates alter their carbon and nutrient metabolic strategies across environmental gradients in the central Pacific Ocean. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 173–186 (2021). · DOI
  6. Zehr, J. P. & Capone, D. G. Changing perspectives in marine nitrogen fixation. Science 368, eaay9514 (2020). · DOI
  7. Salazar, G. et al. Gene expression changes and community turnover differentially shape the global ocean metatranscriptome. Cell 179, 1068–1083.e1021 (2019). · DOI
  8. Saunders, J. K. et al. Microbial functional diversity across biogeochemical provinces in the central Pacific Ocean. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 119, e2200014119 (2022). · DOI
  9. Ustick, L. J. et al. Metagenomic analysis reveals global-scale patterns of ocean nutrient limitation. Science 372, 287–291 (2021). · DOI
  10. Browning, T. J. & Moore, C. M. Global analysis of ocean phytoplankton nutrient limitation reveals high prevalence of colimitation. Nat. Commun. 14, 5014 (2023). · DOI
  11. Halpern, B. S. et al. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319, 948–952 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Barton, A. D., Irwin, A. J., Finkel, Z. V. & Stock, C. A. Anthropogenic climate change drives shift and shuffle in North Atlantic phytoplankton communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 113, 2964–2969 (2016). · DOI
  13. Chaffron, S. et al. Environmental vulnerability of the global ocean epipelagic plankton community interactome. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg1921 (2021). · DOI
  14. Frémont, P. et al. Restructuring of plankton genomic biogeography in the surface ocean under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 393–401 (2022). · DOI
  15. Benedetti, F. et al. Major restructuring of marine plankton assemblages under global warming. Nat. Commun. 12, 5226 (2021). · DOI
  16. Ban, Z., Hu, X. & Li, J. Tipping points of marine phytoplankton to multiple environmental stressors. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 1045–1051 (2022). · DOI
  17. Thomas, M. K., Kremer, C. T., Klausmeier, C. A. & Litchman, E. A global pattern of thermal adaptation in marine phytoplankton. Science 338, 1085–1088 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Boyd, P. W., Lennartz, S. T., Glover, D. M. & Doney, S. C. Biological ramifications of climate-change-mediated oceanic multistressors. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 71–79 (2015). · DOI
  19. Louca, S., Parfrey, L. W. & Doebeli, M. Decoupling function and taxonomy in the global ocean microbiome. Science 353, 1272–1277 (2016). · DOI
  20. Dlugosch, L. et al. Significance of gene variants for the functional biogeography of the near-surface Atlantic Ocean microbiome. Nat. Commun. 13, 456 (2022). · DOI
  21. Larkin, A. A. et al. High spatial resolution global ocean metagenomes from Bio-GO-SHIP repeat hydrography transects. Sci. Data 8, 107 (2021). · DOI
  22. Longhurst, A. R. Ecological geography of the sea (Elsevier, 2007). · DOI
  23. Hörstmann, C. et al. Microbial diversity through an oceanographic lens: refining the concept of ocean provinces through trophic-level analysis and productivity-specific length scales. Environ. Microbiol. 24, 404–419 (2022). · DOI
  24. Li, Z., Zhang, Y. G., Torres, M. & Mills, B. J. W. Neogene burial of organic carbon in the global ocean. Nature 613, 90–95 (2023). · DOI
  25. Bird, C. S. et al. A global perspective on the trophic geography of sharks. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 299–305 (2018). · DOI
  26. Biard, T. et al. In situ imaging reveals the biomass of giant protists in the global ocean. Nature 532, 504–507 (2016). · DOI
  27. Krasting, J. P. et al. NOAA-GFDL GFDL-ESM4 model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.1407 (2018) · DOI
  28. Halpern, B. S. et al. Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world’s ocean. Nat. Commun. 6, 7615 (2015). · DOI
  29. Guerra, C. A. et al. Global hotspots for soil nature conservation. Nature 610, 693–698 (2022). · DOI
  30. Shindell, D. et al. A climate policy pathway for near- and long-term benefits. Science 356, 493–494 (2017). · DOI
  31. Riebesell, U., Wolf-Gladrow, D. A. & Smetacek, V. Carbon dioxide limitation of marine phytoplankton growth rates. Nature 361, 249–251 (1993). · DOI
  32. Hein, M. & Sand-Jensen, K. CO2 increases oceanic primary production. Nature 388, 526–527 (1997). · DOI
  33. Halpern, B. S. et al. An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature 488, 615–620 (2012). · DOI
  34. Abreu, A. et al. Priorities for ocean microbiome research. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 937–947 (2022). · DOI
  35. Zhang, Z. et al. Assessment of global health risk of antibiotic resistance genes. Nat. Commun. 13, 1553 (2022). · DOI
  36. Sills, J. et al. Ocean deoxygenation: Time for action. Science 359, 1475–1476 (2018). · DOI
  37. Sills, J. et al. Ocean acidification science stands strong. Science 372, 1160–1161 (2021). · DOI
  38. Joint, I., Doney, S. C. & Karl, D. M. Will ocean acidification affect marine microbes? ISME J. 5, 1–7 (2011). · DOI
  39. Hai, Z. & Perlman, R. L. Extreme weather events and the politics of climate change attribution. Sci. Adv. 8, eabo2190 (2022). · DOI
  40. Thompson, V. et al. The 2021 western North America heat wave among the most extreme events ever recorded globally. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm6860 (2022). · DOI
  41. Wang, M. et al. The great Atlantic Sargassum belt. Science 365, 83–87 (2019). · DOI
  42. Cavicchioli, R. et al. Scientists’ warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 569–586 (2019). · DOI
  43. Schemm, S. et al. Learning from weather and climate science to prepare for a future pandemic. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 120, e2209091120 (2023). · DOI
  44. King, A. D., Reid, K. J. & Saunders, K. R. Communicating the link between climate change and extreme rain events. Nat. Geosci. 16, 552–554 (2023). · DOI
  45. Costea, P. I. et al. Towards standards for human fecal sample processing in metagenomic studies. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 1069–1076 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  46. Fu, L., Niu, B., Zhu, Z., Wu, S. & Li, W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 3150–3152 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  47. Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  48. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  49. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  50. Nayfach, S. & Pollard, K. S. Average genome size estimation improves comparative metagenomics and sheds light on the functional ecology of the human microbiome. Genome Biol. 16, 51 (2015). · DOI
  51. Lu, J. et al. Metagenome analysis using the Kraken software suite. Nat. Protoc. 17, 2815–2839 (2022). · DOI
  52. Dixon, P. VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J. Vegetation Sci. 14, 927–930 (2003). · DOI
  53. Villanueva, R. A. & Chen, Z. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis (2nd ed.). Meas. Interdiscip. Res. Perspect. 17, 160–167 (2019). · DOI
  54. Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
  55. Chen, C. et al. TBtools: An integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol. Plant 13, 1194–1202 (2020). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Z., Zhang, Q., Chen, B., Yu, Y., Wang, T., Xu, N., Fan, X., Penuelas, J., Fu, Z., Deng, Y., Zhu, Y.-G., & Qian, H.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang University of Technology (CN)
  • Shaoxing University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Qian, Haifeng
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2024-05-31
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
4657-4657
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399205751
Cited by
49
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 7
FWCI
12.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Fundación Ramón Areces (CIVP20A6621)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (TED2021-132627B–I00, 22241603, 22376187, 22241603-3, 10.13039, 21976161, AEI/10.13039/501100011033, 42307158)
  • Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI//10.13039/501100011033/, 501100011033, 10.13039/501100011033, 13039, .13039/501100011033, 10.13039, AEI/10)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFD1700401, 2017YFD0200503, 2022YFD1700400, PID2022-140808NB-I00)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LZ23B070001)
  • NextGenerationEU
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Plankton and Biogeochemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
Keywords
marine microbiome, microbial biogeography, ecological status classification, microbial diversity, microbial community composition, functional traits, poleward shift, photosynthetic carbon fixation, nutrient metabolism, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, surface ocean, biogeochemical processes
MeSH terms
Oceans and Seas, Seawater, Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Climate Change, Carbon Cycle, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review