Cited by 15Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysNuclear Structure and FunctionRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SURF2 is a MDM2 antagonist in triggering the nucleolar stress response

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Cancer cells rely on high ribosome production to sustain their proliferation rate. Many chemotherapies impede ribosome production which is perceived by cells as "nucleolar stress" (NS), triggering p53-dependent and independent pathways leading to cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis. The 5S ribonucleoprotein (RNP) particle, a sub-ribosomal particle, is instrumental to NS response. Upon ribosome assembly defects, the 5S RNP accumulates as free form. This free form is able to sequester and inhibit MDM2, thus promoting p53 stabilization. To investigate how cancer cells can resist to NS, here we purify free 5S RNP and uncover an interaction partner, SURF2. Functional characterization of SURF2 shows that its depletion increases cellular sensitivity to NS, while its overexpression promotes their resistance to it. Consistently, SURF2 is overexpressed in many cancers and its expression level is an independent marker of prognosis for adrenocortical cancer. Our data demonstrate that SURF2 buffers free 5S RNP particles, and can modulate their activity, paving the way for the research of new molecules that can finely tune the response to nucleolar stress in the framework of cancer therapies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-024-52659-x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. Zhong, L. et al. Small molecules in targeted cancer therapy: advances, challenges, and future perspectives. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 6, 201 (2021). · DOI
  2. Sabnis, A. J. & Bivona, T. G. Principles of resistance to targeted cancer therapy: Lessons from basic and translational cancer biology. Trends Mol. Med. 25, 185–197 (2019). · DOI
  3. Montanaro, L., Treré, D. & Derenzini, M. Nucleolus, ribosomes, and cancer. Am. J. Pathol. 173, 301–310 (2008). · DOI
  4. Derenzini, M. et al. Nucleolar size indicates the rapidity of cell proliferation in cancer tissues. J. Pathol. 191, 181–186 (2000). · DOI
  5. Henras, A. K. et al. The post-transcriptional steps of eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65, 2334–2359 (2008). · DOI
  6. Albert, B. et al. A ribosome assembly stress response regulates transcription to maintain proteome homeostasis. ELife 8, e45002 (2019). · DOI
  7. Mayer, C. & Grummt, I. Cellular stress and nucleolar function. Cell Cycle 4, 1036–1038 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Olson, M. O. J. Sensing Cellular Stress: Another New Function for the Nucleolus? Sci. STKE https://doi.org/10.1126/stke.2242004pe10 (2004). · DOI
  9. Nicolas, E. et al. Involvement of human ribosomal proteins in nucleolar structure and p53-dependent nucleolar stress. Nat. Commun. 7, 11390 (2016). · DOI
  10. Golomb, L. Volarevic, S. & Oren, M. p53 and ribosome biogenesis stress: the essentials. FEBS Lett., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2014.04.014 (2014). · DOI
  11. Donati, G., Peddigari, S., Mercer, C. A. & Thomas, G. 5S ribosomal RNA is an essential component of a nascent ribosomal precursor complex that regulates the Hdm2-p53 checkpoint. Cell Rep. 4, 87–98 (2013). · DOI
  12. Domostegui, A. et al. Impaired ribosome biogenesis checkpoint activation induces p53-dependent MCL-1 degradation and MYC-driven lymphoma death. Blood 137, 3351–3364 (2021). · DOI
  13. Pelletier, J. et al. Nucleotide depletion reveals the impaired ribosome biogenesis checkpoint as a barrier against DNA damage. EMBO J. 39, e103838 (2020). · DOI
  14. Hannan, K. M. et al. Nuclear stabilization of p53 requires a functional nucleolar surveillance pathway. Cell Rep. 41, 111571 (2022). · DOI
  15. Lindström, M. S., Bartek, J. & Maya-Mendoza, A. p53 at the crossroad of DNA replication and ribosome biogenesis stress pathways. Cell Death Differ. 29, 972–982 (2022). · DOI
  16. Rubbi, C. P. Disruption of the nucleolus mediates stabilization of p53 in response to DNA damage and other stresses. EMBO J. 22, 6068–6077 (2003). · DOI
  17. Zhou, X., Hao, Q., Liao, J., Zhang, Q. & Lu, H. Ribosomal protein S14 unties the MDM2-p53 loop upon ribosomal stress. Oncogene 32, 388–396 (2013). · DOI
  18. Zhou, X., Liao, W.-J., Liao, J.-M., Liao, P. & Lu, H. Ribosomal proteins: functions beyond the ribosome. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 92–104 (2015). · DOI
  19. Yadavilli, S. et al. Ribosomal protein S3: A multi-functional protein that interacts with both p53 and MDM2 through its KH domain. DNA Rep. 8, 1215–1224 (2009). · DOI
  20. Zhang, X. et al. Identification of ribosomal protein S25 (RPS25)-MDM2-p53 regulatory feedback loop. Oncogene 32, 2782–2791 (2013). · DOI
  21. Marechal, V., Elenbaas, B., Piette, J., Nicolas, J. C. & Levine, A. J. The ribosomal L5 protein is associated with mdm-2 and mdm-2-p53 complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 7414–7420 (1994).
  22. Sloan, K. E., Bohnsack, M. T. & Watkins, N. J. The 5S RNP couples p53 homeostasis to ribosome biogenesis and nucleolar stress. Cell Rep. 5, 237–247 (2013). · DOI
  23. Nishimura, K. et al. Perturbation of ribosome biogenesis drives cells into senescence through 5S RNP-mediated p53 activation. Cell Rep. 10, 1310–1323 (2015). · DOI
  24. Bursać, S. et al. Mutual protection of ribosomal proteins L5 and L11 from degradation is essential for p53 activation upon ribosomal biogenesis stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 20467–20472 (2012). · DOI
  25. Cao, P. et al. Genomic gain of RRS1 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma through reducing the RPL11-MDM2-p53 signaling. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf4304 (2021). · DOI
  26. Burger, K. et al. Chemotherapeutic drugs inhibit ribosome biogenesis at various levels. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 12416–12425 (2010). · DOI
  27. Derenzini, E., Rossi, A. & Treré, D. Treating hematological malignancies with drugs inhibiting ribosome biogenesis: when and why. J. Hematol. Oncol. 11, 75 (2018). · DOI
  28. Drygin, D. et al. Targeting RNA polymerase I with an oral small molecule CX-5461 inhibits ribosomal RNA synthesis and solid tumor growth. Cancer Res. 71, 1418–1430 (2011). · DOI
  29. Ferreira, R., Schneekloth, J. S., Panov, K. I., Hannan, K. M. & Hannan, R. D. Targeting the RNA polymerase I transcription for cancer therapy comes of age. Cells 9, 266 (2020). · DOI
  30. Khot, A. et al. First-in-human RNA polymerase I transcription inhibitor CX-5461 in patients with advanced hematologic cancers: Results of a phase I dose-escalation study. Cancer Discov. 9, 1036–1049 (2019). · DOI
  31. Baßler, J. & Hurt, E. Eukaryotic ribosome assembly. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 88, 281–306 (2019). · DOI
  32. Pestov, D. G., Strezoska, Z. & Lau, L. F. Evidence of p53-dependent cross-talk between ribosome biogenesis and the cell cycle: effects of nucleolar protein Bop1 on G(1)/S transition. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 4246–4255 (2001). · DOI
  33. Aubert, M. O’Donohue, M.-F. Lebaron, & Gleizes, S. P.-E. Pre-ribosomal RNA processing in human cells: From mechanisms to congenital diseases. Biomolecules https://doi.org/10.3390/biom8040123 (2018). · DOI
  34. Lebaron, S. et al. Functionally impaired RPL8 variants associated with Diamond–Blackfan anemia and a Diamond–Blackfan anemia‐like phenotype. Hum. Mutat. 43, 389–402 (2022). · DOI
  35. Oršolić, I. et al. Cancer-associated mutations in the ribosomal protein L5 gene dysregulate the HDM2/p53-mediated ribosome biogenesis checkpoint. Oncogene 39, 3443–3457 (2020). · DOI
  36. Zheng, J. et al. Structure of human MDM2 complexed with RPL11 reveals the molecular basis of p53 activation. Genes Dev. 29, 1524–1534 (2015). · DOI
  37. Miliani de Marval, P. L. & Zhang, Y. The RP-Mdm2-p53 pathway and tumorigenesis. Oncotarget 2, 234–238 (2011). · DOI
  38. Rinke, J. & Steitz, J. A. Precursor molecules of both human 5S ribosomal RNA and transfer RNAs are bound by a cellular protein reactive with anti-La lupus antibodies. Cell 29, 149–159 (1982). · DOI
  39. Steitz, J. A. et al. A 5S rRNA/L5 complex is a precursor to ribosome assembly in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 106, 545–556 (1988). · DOI
  40. Kressler, D. et al. Synchronizing nuclear import of ribosomal proteins with ribosome assembly. Science 338, 666–671 (2012). · DOI
  41. O’Donohue, M.-F. et al. HEATR3 variants impair nuclear import of uL18 (RPL5) and drive Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Blood https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2021011846 (2022). · DOI
  42. Castillo Duque de Estrada, N. M. et al. Structure of nascent 5S RNPs at the crossroad between ribosome assembly and MDM2-p53 pathways. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 1119–1131 (2023). · DOI
  43. Vassilev, L. T. et al. In vivo activation of the p53 pathway by small-molecule antagonists of MDM2. Science 303, 844–848 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  44. Duhig, T., Ruhrberg, C., Mor, O. & Fried, M. The human Surfeit locus. Genomics 52, 72–78 (1998). · DOI
  45. Vernon, E. G. & Gaston, K. Myc and YY1 mediate activation of the Surf-1 promoter in response to serum growth factors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1492, 172–179 (2000). · DOI
  46. Mellacheruvu, D. et al. The CRAPome: a contaminant repository for affinity purification-mass spectrometry data. Nat. Methods 10, 730–736 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  47. Madru, C. et al. Chaperoning 5S RNA assembly. Genes Dev. 29, 1432–1446 (2015). · DOI
  48. Asano, N. et al. Structural and functional analysis of the Rpf2-Rrs1 complex in ribosome biogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv305 (2015). · DOI
  49. Kharde, S. Calvino, F. R. Gumiero, A. Wild, K. & Sinning, I. The structure of Rpf2-Rrs1 explains its role in ribosome biogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv640 (2015). · DOI
  50. Nieto, B. et al. Efficient fractionation and analysis of ribosome assembly intermediates in human cells. RNA Biol. 18, 182–197 (2021). · DOI
  51. Wang, M., Anikin, L. & Pestov, D. G. Two orthogonal cleavages separate subunit RNAs in mouse ribosome biogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 11180–11191 (2014). · DOI
  52. Lindström, M. S., Jin, A., Deisenroth, C., Wolf, G. White & Zhang, Y. Cancer-associated mutations in the MDM2 zinc finger domain disrupt ribosomal protein interaction and attenuate MDM2-induced p53 degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 1056–1068 (2007). · DOI
  53. Russo, A. & Russo, G. Ribosomal proteins control or bypass p53 during Nucleolar Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 140 (2017). · DOI
  54. Dai, M.-S., Arnold, H., Sun, X.-X., Sears, R. & Lu, H. Inhibition of c-Myc activity by ribosomal protein L11. EMBO J. 26, 3332–3345 (2007). · DOI
  55. Carotenuto, P., Pecoraro, A., Palma, G., Russo, G. & Russo, A. Therapeutic approaches targeting nucleolus in cancer. Cells 8, 1090 (2019). · DOI
  56. Howard, G. C. et al. Ribosome subunit attrition and activation of the p53–MDM4 axis dominate the response of MLL-rearranged cancer cells to WDR5 WIN site inhibition. ELife 12, RP90683 (2024). · DOI
  57. Jansen, J. Bohnsack, K. E. Böhlken-Fascher, S. Bohnsack, M. T. & Dobbelstein, M. The ribosomal protein L22 binds the MDM4 pre-mRNA and promotes exon skipping to activate p53 upon nucleolar stress. Cell Rep 43, 114610 (2023). · DOI
  58. Ghosh, C., Hu, J. & Kebebew, E. Advances in translational research of the rare cancer type adrenocortical carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Cancer 23, 805–824 (2023). · DOI
  59. Yin, M. et al. Identification of key genes and pathways in adrenocortical carcinoma: evidence from bioinformatic analysis. Front. Endocrinol. 14, 1250033 (2023). · DOI
  60. Aspesi, A. et al. Lymphoblastoid cell lines from Diamond Blackfan anaemia patients exhibit a full ribosomal stress phenotype that is rescued by gene therapy. Sci. Rep. 7, 12010 (2017). · DOI
  61. Le Goff, S. et al. p53 activation during ribosome biogenesis regulates normal erythroid differentiation. Blood 137, 89–102 (2021). · DOI
  62. Jones, N. C. et al. Prevention of the neurocristopathy Treacher Collins syndrome through inhibition of p53 function. Nat. Med. 14, 125–133 (2008). · DOI
  63. Vlachos, A., Rosenberg, P. S., Atsidaftos, E., Alter, B. P. & Lipton, J. M. Incidence of neoplasia in Diamond Blackfan anemia: a report from the Diamond Blackfan Anemia Registry. Blood 119, 3815–3819 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  64. Kennedy, A. L. et al. Distinct genetic pathways define pre-malignant versus compensatory clonal hematopoiesis in Shwachman-Diamond syndrome. Nat. Commun. 12, 1334 (2021). · DOI
  65. Tan, S. et al. Somatic genetic rescue of a germline ribosome assembly defect. Nat. Commun. 12, 5044 (2021). · DOI
  66. Reilly, C. R. & Shimamura, A. Predisposition to myeloid malignancies in Shwachman-Diamond syndrome: biological insights and clinical advances. Blood 141, 1513–1523 (2023). · DOI
  67. HaileMariam, M. et al. S-Trap, an ultrafast sample-preparation approach for shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 17, 2917–2924 (2018). · DOI
  68. Bouyssié, D. et al. mzDB: A file format using multiple indexing strategies for the efficient analysis of large LC-MS/MS and SWATH-MS data sets ∗. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 771–781 (2015). · DOI
  69. Bouyssié, D. et al. Proline: an efficient and user-friendly software suite for large-scale proteomics. Bioinformatics 36, 3148–3155 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  70. Lebaron, S. et al. The ATPase and helicase activities of Prp43p are stimulated by the G-patch protein Pfa1p during yeast ribosome biogenesis. EMBO J. 28, 3808–3819 (2009). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Tagnères, S., Santo, P. E., Radermecker, J., Rinaldi, D., Froment, C., Provost, Q., Bongers, M., Capeille, S., Watkins, N., Marcoux, J., Gleizes, P.-E., Marcel, V., Plisson-Chastang, C., & Lebaron, S.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Lebaron, Simon
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2024-09-27
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
8404-8404
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402903566
Cited by
15
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Ligue Contre le Cancer (62339, Labelisation)
  • Institut National Du Cancer (PLBIO022-065)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
nucleolar stress response, ribosome biogenesis, p53 stabilization, tumor resistance, adrenocortical carcinoma, prognostic factors, chemoresistance
MeSH terms
RNA-Seq, Antineoplastic Agents, Cell Nucleolus, Cell Survival, Humans, Neoplasms, Proteins, Ribonucleoproteins, Ribosomes, Stress, Physiological, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Apoptosis, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2, Protein Stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review