Cited by 7Computational Drug Discovery MethodsReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingAdvanced Graph Neural Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Labels as a feature: Network homophily for systematically annotating human GPCR drug-target interactions

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Machine learning has revolutionized drug discovery by enabling the exploration of vast, uncharted chemical spaces essential for discovering novel patentable drugs. Despite the critical role of human G protein-coupled receptors in FDA-approved drugs, exhaustive in-distribution drug-target interaction testing across all pairs of human G protein-coupled receptors and known drugs is rare due to significant economic and technical challenges. This often leaves off-target effects unexplored, which poses a considerable risk to drug safety. In contrast to the traditional focus on out-of-distribution exploration (drug discovery), we introduce a neighborhood-to-prediction model termed Chemical Space Neural Networks that leverages network homophily and training-free graph neural networks with labels as features. We show that Chemical Space Neural Networks’ ability to make accurate predictions strongly correlates with network homophily. Thus, labels as features strongly increase a machine learning model’s capacity to enhance in-distribution prediction accuracy, which we show by integrating labeled data during inference. We validate these advancements in a high-throughput yeast biosensing system (3773 drug-target interactions, 539 compounds, 7 human G protein-coupled receptors) to discover novel drug-target interactions for FDA-approved drugs and to expand the general understanding of how to build reliable predictors to guide experimental verification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-025-59418-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Catacutan, D. B., Alexander, J., Arnold, A. & Stokes, J. M. Machine learning in preclinical drug discovery. Nat. Chem. Biol. 20, 960–973 (2024). · DOI
  2. Vamathevan, J. et al. Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 18, 463–477 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Alhosaini, K., Azhar, A., Alonazi, A. & Al-Zoghaibi, F. Gpcrs: The most promiscuous druggable receptor of the mankind. Saudi Pharm. J. 29, 539–551 (2021). · DOI
  4. Sriram, K. & Insel, P. A. G Protein-Coupled receptors as targets for approved drugs: How many targets and how many drugs? Mol. Pharmacol. 93, 251–258 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Insel, P. A., Tang, C.-M., Hahntow, I. & Michel, M. C. Impact of gpcrs in clinical medicine: Monogenic diseases, genetic variants and drug targets. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1768, 994–1005 (2007). · DOI
  6. Wu, Z., Li, W., Liu, G. & Tang, Y. Network-based methods for prediction of drug-target interactions. Front. Pharmacol. 9, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01134 (2018). · DOI
  7. Jamu, I. M. & Okamoto, H. Recent advances in understanding adverse effects associated with drugs targeting the serotonin receptor, 5-HT GPCR. Front. Glob. Women’s. Health 3, 1012463 (2022). · DOI
  8. Yang, D. et al. G protein-coupled receptors: structure- and function-based drug discovery. Sig. Transduct. Target. Ther. 6, 1–27 (2021). · DOI
  9. Vogt, M., Stumpfe, D., Maggiora, G. M. & Bajorath, J. Lessons learned from the design of chemical space networks and opportunities for new applications. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 30, 191–208 (2016). · DOI
  10. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. & Cook, J. M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27, 415–444 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Sato, R. Training-free graph neural networks and the power of labels as features. Transactions on Machine Learning Research. 2835–8856 (2024).
  12. Mendez, D. et al. ChEMBL: towards direct deposition of bioassay data. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D930–D940 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Harding, S. D. et al. The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2024. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D1438–D1449 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Lo, Y.-C. et al. Large-scale chemical similarity networks for target profiling of compounds identified in cell-based chemical screens. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004153 (2015). · DOI
  15. Wu, Z. et al. wSDTNBI: a novel network-based inference method for virtual screening. Chem. Sci. 13, 1060–1079 (2022). · DOI
  16. Fey, M. & Lenssen, J. E. Fast graph representation learning with PyTorch geometric. International Conference on Learning Representations. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.02428 (2019). · DOI
  17. Velloso, J. P. L., Ascher, D. B. & Pires, D. E. V. pdCSM-GPCR: predicting potent GPCR ligands with graph-based signatures. Bioinform. Adv. 1, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbab031 (2021). · DOI
  18. Kapolka, N. J. et al. DCyFIR: a high-throughput CRISPR platform for multiplexed G protein-coupled receptor profiling and ligand discovery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 13117–13126 (2020). · DOI
  19. Miettinen, K. et al. A GPCR-based yeast biosensor for biomedical, biotechnological, and point-of-use cannabinoid determination. Nat. Commun. 13, 3664 (2022). · DOI
  20. Erlenbach, I. et al. Functional expression of m(1), m(3) and m(5) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in yeast. J. Neurochem. 77, 1327–1337 (2001). · DOI
  21. Ehrenworth, A. M., Claiborne, T. & Peralta-Yahya, P. Medium-Throughput screen of microbially produced serotonin via a G-Protein-Coupled Receptor-Based sensor. Biochemistry 56, 5471–5475 (2017). · DOI
  22. Gaibelet, G. et al. Nonselective coupling of the human μ-opioid receptor to multiple inhibitory g-protein isoforms. Eur. J. Biochem. 261, 517–523 (1999). · DOI
  23. Kokkola, T. et al. Mutagenesis of human mel1a melatonin receptor expressed in yeast reveals domains important for receptor function. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 249, 531–536 (1998). · DOI
  24. Shaw, W. M. et al. Engineering a model cell for rational tuning of GPCR signaling. Cell 177, 782–796 (2019). · DOI
  25. England, C. G., Ehlerding, E. B. & Cai, W. Nanoluc: A small luciferase is brightening up the field of bioluminescence. Bioconjugate Chem. 27, 1175–1187 (2016). · DOI
  26. Fish, I. et al. Structure-Based design and discovery of new M2 receptor agonists. J. Med. Chem. 60, 9239–9250 (2017). · DOI
  27. Jeong, E. J., Chung, S. Y., Hong, H. N., Oh, S.-W. & Sim, J. Y. The novel, potent and highly selective 5-HT4 receptor agonist YH12852 significantly improves both upper and lower gastrointestinal motility. Br. J. Pharmacol. 175, 485–500 (2018). · DOI
  28. Moran, S. P., Maksymetz, J. & Conn, P. J. Targeting muscarinic acetylcholine receptors for the treatment of psychiatric and neurological disorders. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 40, 1006–1020 (2019). · DOI
  29. Cowley Jr, A. W. Chrm3 gene and M3 muscarinic receptors contribute to Salt-Sensitive hypertension. Hypertension 72, 588–591 (2018). · DOI
  30. Rivara, S., Mor, M., Bedini, A., Spadoni, G. & Tarzia, G. Melatonin receptor agonists: SAR and applications to the treatment of sleep-wake disorders. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 8, 954–968 (2008). · DOI
  31. Kunimoto, R. & Bajorath, J. Combining Similarity Searching and Network Analysis for the Identification of Active Compounds. ACS Omega 3, 3768–3777 (2018). · DOI
  32. Zhu, J et al. Beyond homophily in graph neural networks: current limitations and effective designs. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS ‘20), 7793–7804 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2020).
  33. Ma, Y., Liu, X., Shah, N. & Tang, J. Is homophily a necessity for graph neural networks? Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.06134 (2023). · DOI
  34. Stumpfe, D., Hu, H. & Bajorath, J. Evolving concept of activity cliffs. ACS Omega 4, 14360–14368 (2019). · DOI
  35. Durairaj, J. et al. PLINDER: The protein-ligand interactions dataset and evaluation resource. ICML’24 Workshop ML for Life and Material Science: From Theory to Industry Application. (2024). · DOI
  36. Cheng, F. et al. Prediction of drug-target interactions and drug repositioning via network-based inference. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002503 (2012). · DOI
  37. Amara, K., Rodríguez-Pérez, R. & Jiménez-Luna, J. Explaining compound activity predictions with a substructure-aware loss for graph neural networks. J. Cheminform. 15, 67 (2023). · DOI
  38. Jiménez-Luna, J., Grisoni, F. & Schneider, G. Drug discovery with explainable artificial intelligence. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 573–584 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  39. Deichmann, M., Hansson, F. G. & Jensen, E. D. Yeast-based screening platforms to understand and improve human health. Trends Biotechnol. 42, 1258–1272 (2024). · DOI
  40. Bradley, S. A. et al. Biosynthesis of natural and halogenated plant monoterpene indole alkaloids in yeast. Nat. Chem. Biol. 19, 1551–1560 (2023). · DOI
  41. Jensen, E. D. et al. Engineered cell differentiation and sexual reproduction in probiotic and mating yeasts. Nat. Commun. 13, 6201 (2022). · DOI
  42. Anastasiu, D. C. & Karypis, G. Efficient identification of Tanimoto nearest neighbors. Int. J. Data Sci. Anal. 4, 153–172 (2017). · DOI
  43. Scalfani, V. F., Patel, V. D. & Fernandez, A. M. Visualizing chemical space networks with RDKit and NetworkX. J. Cheminform. 14, 87 (2022). · DOI
  44. Matter, H., Buning, C., Stefanescu, D. D., Ruf, S. & Hessler, G. Using graph databases to investigate trends in structure–activity relationship networks. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 6120–6134 (2020). · DOI
  45. Dalkıran, A. et al. Transfer learning for drug–target interaction prediction. Bioinformatics 39, i103–i110 (2023). · DOI
  46. Yang, K. et al. Analyzing learned molecular representations for property prediction. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59, 3370–3388 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  47. Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
  48. Bronstein, M. M., Bruna, J., Cohen, T. & Veličković, P. Geometric deep learning: Grids, groups, graphs, geodesics, and gauges. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.13478 (2021). · DOI
  49. Kingma, D. and Ba, J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. International Conference on Learning Representations, Vol. 12 (2014).
  50. Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE v5 enables improved estimates of 55genetic tree confidence by ensemble bootstrapping. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.20.449169 (2021). · DOI
  51. Talevich, E., Invergo, B. M., Cock, P. J. A. & Chapman, B. A. Bio.55: a unified toolkit for processing, analyzing and visualizing 55genetic trees in biopython. BMC Bioinform. 13, 209 (2012). · DOI
  52. Huerta-Cepas, J., Serra, F. & Bork, P. ETE 3: Reconstruction, analysis, and visualization of 55genomic data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1635–1638 (2016). · DOI
  53. Nour-Eldin, H. H., Hansen, B. G., Nørholm, M. H. H., Jensen, J. K. & Halkier, B. A. Advancing uracil-excision based cloning towards an ideal technique for cloning PCR fragments. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, e122 (2006). · DOI
  54. Jessop-Fabre, M. M. et al. EasyClone-MarkerFree: A vector toolkit for marker-less integration of genes into saccharomyces cerevisiae via CRISPR-Cas9. Biotechnol. J. 11, 1110–1117 (2016). · DOI
  55. Jakočiūnas, T. et al. Multiplex metabolic pathway engineering using CRISPR/Cas9 in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 28, 213–222 (2015). · DOI
  56. Gietz, R. D. & Schiestl, R. H. Large-scale high-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat. Protoc. 2, 38–41 (2007). · DOI
  57. Lengger, B. et al. Serotonin G protein-coupled receptor-based biosensing modalities in yeast. ACS Sens. 7, 1323–1335 (2022). · DOI
  58. Prins, R. C. & Billerbeck, S. A buffered media system for yeast batch culture growth. BMC Microbiol. 21, 127 (2021). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Hansson, F. G., Madsen, N. G., Hansen, L. G., Jakočiūnas, T., Lengger, B., Keasling, J. D., Jensen, M. K., Acevedo-Rocha, C. G., & Jensen, E. D.
Affiliations
  • Novo Nordisk Foundation (DK)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Jensen, Emil D.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2025-05-03
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
4121-4121
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410020821
Cited by
7
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Villum Fonden (40516)
  • European Commission (814645)
  • Novo Nordisk (NNF20CC0035580)
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF21SA0069429, NNF20CC0035580)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
Keywords
G protein-coupled receptors, drug-target interactions, network homophily, graph neural networks, off-target effects, drug safety, drug discovery, FDA-approved drugs
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review