Cited by 80Antimicrobial Peptides and ActivitiesMicrobial Natural Products and BiosynthesisAntimicrobial agents and applications

The rumen microbiome: an underexplored resource for novel antimicrobial discovery

Open access
Oyama, Linda B., Girdwood, Susan E., Cookson, Alan R., Fernandez-Fuentes, Narcis, Privé, Florence, Vallin, Hannah E., Wilkinson, Toby J., Golyshin, Peter N. +15 more·2017·npj Biofilms and Microbiomes

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are promising drug candidates to target multi-drug resistant bacteria. The rumen microbiome presents an underexplored resource for the discovery of novel microbial enzymes and metabolites, including AMPs. Using functional screening and computational approaches, we identified 181 potentially novel AMPs from a rumen bacterial metagenome. Here, we show that three of the selected AMPs (Lynronne-1, Lynronne-2 and Lynronne-3) were effective against numerous bacterial pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). No decrease in MRSA susceptibility was observed after 25 days of sub-lethal exposure to these AMPs. The AMPs bound preferentially to bacterial membrane lipids and induced membrane permeability leading to cytoplasmic leakage. Topical administration of Lynronne-1 (10% w/v) to a mouse model of MRSA wound infection elicited a significant reduction in bacterial counts, which was comparable to treatment with 2% mupirocin ointment. Our findings indicate that the rumen microbiome may provide viable alternative antimicrobials for future therapeutic application.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41522-017-0042-1

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [42]Boyd, M. R. in Anticancer Drug Development Guide: Preclinical Screening, Clinical Trials, and Approval (ed Teicher, B. A.) pp. 23–42 (Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, 1997).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oyama, L. B., Girdwood, S. E., Cookson, A. R., Fernandez-Fuentes, N., Privé, F., Vallin, H. E., Wilkinson, T. J., Golyshin, P. N., Golyshina, O. V., Mikut, R., Hilpert, K., Richards, J., Wootton, M., Edwards, J. E., Maresca, M., Perrier, J., Lundy, F. T., Luo, Y., Zhou, M., Hess, M., Mantovani, H. C., Creevey, C. J., & Huws, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Aberystwyth University (GB)
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
  • University Hospital of Wales (GB)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Huws, Sharon A.
Venue
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
Published
2017-12-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
33-33
ISSN
2055-5008 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2734956387
Cited by
80
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Biofilms and Microbiomes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bangor University Research Portal (Bangor University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KITopen (cc-by)
Funders
  • Research Councils UK (BB/L026716/1, 172629373)
  • Life Sciences Research Network Wales
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (M029085, 172629373, BB/M029085/1, BBS/E/W/0012843D, BB/M029085, BB/L026716/1, ERA-IB-14-030, BBS/E/W/10964A01D, BB/L026716/2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
Keywords
rumen microbiome, antimicrobial peptides, antimicrobial drug discovery, metagenome mining, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, bacterial membrane permeability, bacterial membrane lipids, topical antimicrobial therapy, wound infection, multidrug-resistant bacteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review