Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 361

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Key recommendations for primary care from the 2022 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) update

Open access
Levy, Mark L., Bacharier, Leonard B., Bateman, Eric, Boulet, Louis-Philippe, Brightling, Chris, Buhl, Roland, Brusselle, Guy, Cruz, Alvaro A., Drazen, Jeffrey M., Duijts, Liesbeth, Fleming, Louise, Inoue, Hiromasa, Ko, Fanny W. S., Krishnan, Jerry A., Mortimer, Kevin, Pitrez, Paulo M., Sheikh, Aziz, Yorgancıoğlu, Arzu, Reddel, Helen K.·2023·npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) was established in 1993 by the World Health Organization and the US National Heart Lung and Blood Institute to improve asthma awareness, prevention and management worldwide. GINA develops and publishes evidence-based, annually updated resources for clinicians. GINA guidance is adopted by national asthma guidelines in many countries, adapted to fit local healthcare systems, practices, and resource availability. GINA is independent of industry, funded by the sale and licensing of its materials. This review summarizes key practical guidance for primary care from the 2022 GINA strategy report. It provides guidance on confirming the diagnosis of asthma using spirometry or peak expiratory flow. GINA recommends that all adults, adolescents and most children with asthma should receive inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing therapy to reduce the risk of severe exacerbations, either taken regularly, or (for adults and adolescents with “mild” asthma) as combination ICS–formoterol taken as needed for symptom relief. For patients with moderate–severe asthma, the preferred regimen is maintenance-and-reliever therapy (MART) with ICS–formoterol. Asthma treatment is not “one size fits all”; GINA recommends individualized assessment, adjustment, and review of treatment. As many patients with difficult-to-treat or severe asthma are not referred early for specialist review, we provide updated guidance for primary care on diagnosis, further investigation, optimization and treatment of severe asthma across secondary and tertiary care. While the GINA strategy has global relevance, we recognize that there are special considerations for its adoption in low- and middle-income countries, particularly the current poor access to inhaled medications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41533-023-00330-1

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Cited by

See all 361

Metadata

Authors
Levy, M. L., Bacharier, L. B., Bateman, E., Boulet, L.-P., Brightling, C., Buhl, R., Brusselle, G., Cruz, A. A., Drazen, J. M., Duijts, L., Fleming, L., Inoue, H., Ko, F. W. S., Krishnan, J. A., Mortimer, K., Pitrez, P. M., Sheikh, A., Yorgancıoğlu, A., & Reddel, H. K.
Venue
npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
Published
2023-02-08
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
7-7
ISSN
2055-1010 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319596235
Cited by
361
References
45
FWCI
52.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Key recommendations for primary care from the 2022 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41533-023-00330-1
The paper
Levy, M. L., Bacharier, L. B., Bateman, E., Boulet, L.-P., Brightling, C., Buhl, R., Brusselle, G., Cruz, A. A., Drazen, J. M., Duijts, L., Fleming, L., Inoue, H., Ko, F. W. S., Krishnan, J. A., Mortimer, K., Pitrez, P. M., Sheikh, A., Yorgancıoğlu, A., & Reddel, H. K. (2023). Key recommendations for primary care from the 2022 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) update. npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-023-00330-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.