The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inhaled Combined Budesonide–Formoterol as Needed in Mild Asthma
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: -agonist may be an alternative to conventional treatment strategies. METHODS: We conducted a 52-week, double-blind trial involving patients 12 years of age or older with mild asthma. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three regimens: twice-daily placebo plus terbutaline (0.5 mg) used as needed (terbutaline group), twice-daily placebo plus budesonide-formoterol (200 μg of budesonide and 6 μg of formoterol) used as needed (budesonide-formoterol group), or twice-daily budesonide (200 μg) plus terbutaline used as needed (budesonide maintenance group). The primary objective was to investigate the superiority of as-needed budesonide-formoterol to as-needed terbutaline with regard to electronically recorded weeks with well-controlled asthma. RESULTS: A total of 3849 patients underwent randomization, and 3836 (1277 in the terbutaline group, 1277 in the budesonide-formoterol group, and 1282 in the budesonide maintenance group) were included in the full analysis and safety data sets. With respect to the mean percentage of weeks with well-controlled asthma per patient, budesonide-formoterol was superior to terbutaline (34.4% vs. 31.1% of weeks; odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 1.30; P=0.046) but inferior to budesonide maintenance therapy (34.4% and 44.4%, respectively; odds ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.73). The annual rate of severe exacerbations was 0.20 with terbutaline, 0.07 with budesonide-formoterol, and 0.09 with budesonide maintenance therapy; the rate ratio was 0.36 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.49) for budesonide-formoterol versus terbutaline and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.59 to 1.16) for budesonide-formoterol versus budesonide maintenance therapy. The rate of adherence in the budesonide maintenance group was 78.9%. The median metered daily dose of inhaled glucocorticoid in the budesonide-formoterol group (57 μg) was 17% of the dose in the budesonide maintenance group (340 μg). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild asthma, as-needed budesonide-formoterol provided superior asthma-symptom control to as-needed terbutaline, assessed according to electronically recorded weeks with well-controlled asthma, but was inferior to budesonide maintenance therapy. Exacerbation rates with the two budesonide-containing regimens were similar and were lower than the rate with terbutaline. Budesonide-formoterol used as needed resulted in substantially lower glucocorticoid exposure than budesonide maintenance therapy. (Funded by AstraZeneca; SYGMA 1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02149199 .).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Budesonide/Formoterol Combination Therapy as Both Maintenance and Reliever Medication in Asthma
O'Byrne, P. M., Bisgaard, H., Godard, P. P., Pistolesi, M., Palmqvist, M., Zhu, Y., Ekström, T., & Bateman, E. D. (2005) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200407-884oc · Cited by 657
Self-citation
Cited by
Improving lung health in low-income and middle-income countries: from challenges to solutions
Meghji, J., Mortimer, K., Agusti, A., Allwood, B. W., Asher, I., Bateman, E. D., Bissell, K., Bolton, C. E., Bush, A., Celli, B., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00458-x · Cited by 470
Self-citationControlled Trial of Budesonide–Formoterol as Needed for Mild Asthma
Beasley, R., Holliday, M., Reddel, H. K., Braithwaite, I., Ebmeier, S., Hancox, R. J., Harrison, T., Houghton, C., Oldfield, K., Papi, A., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1901963 · Cited by 466
Self-citationKey recommendations for primary care from the 2022 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) update
Levy, M. L., Bacharier, L. B., Bateman, E., Boulet, L.-P., Brightling, C., Buhl, R., Brusselle, G., Cruz, A. A., Drazen, J. M., Duijts, L., et al. (2023) · npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41533-023-00330-1 · Cited by 361
Self-citationEAACI Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy: House dust mite‐driven allergic asthma
Agache, I., Lau, S., Akdis, C. A., Smolinska, S., Bonini, M., Cavkaytar, O., Flood, B., Gajdanowicz, P., Izuhara, K., Kalayci, O., et al. (2019) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.13749 · Cited by 319
Glucocorticoids—All-Rounders Tackling the Versatile Players of the Immune System
Strehl, C., Ehlers, L., Gaber, T., & Buttgereit, F. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01744 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- O’Byrne, P. M., FitzGerald, J. M., Bateman, E. D., Barnes, P. J., Zhong, N., Keen, C., Jorup, C., Lamarca, R., Ivanov, S., & Reddel, H. K.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2018-05-17
- Volume
- 378
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 1865-1876
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2804974483
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 47.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhaled Combined Budesonide–Formoterol as Needed in Mild Asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1715274
- The paper
- O’Byrne, P. M., FitzGerald, J. M., Bateman, E. D., Barnes, P. J., Zhong, N., Keen, C., Jorup, C., Lamarca, R., Ivanov, S., & Reddel, H. K. (2018). Inhaled Combined Budesonide–Formoterol as Needed in Mild Asthma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1715274
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.