Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for heavy-seed origin of early supermassive black holes from a z ≈ 10 X-ray quasar

Open access
Bogdán, Ákos, Goulding, Andy D., Natarajan, Priyamvada, Kovács, Orsolya E., Tremblay, Grant R., Chadayammuri, Urmila, Volonteri, Marta, Kraft, Ralph P., Forman, William R., Jones, Christine, Churazov, Eugene, Zhuravleva, Irina·2023·Nature Astronomy

Abstract

Observations of quasars reveal that many supermassive black holes (BHs) were in place less than 700 Myr after the Big Bang. However, the origin of the first BHs remains a mystery. Seeds of the first BHs are postulated to be either light (that is, 10−100 M⊙), remnants of the first stars, or heavy (that is, 10−105 M⊙), originating from the direct collapse of gas clouds. Here, harnessing recent data from the Chandra X-ray Observatory, we report the detection of an X-ray-luminous massive BH in a gravitationally lensed galaxy identified by the James Webb Space Telescope at redshift z ≈ 10.3 behind the cluster lens Abell 2744. This heavily obscured quasar with a bolometric luminosity of ~5 × 1045 erg s−1 harbours an ~107−108 M⊙ BH assuming accretion at the Eddington limit. This mass is comparable to the inferred stellar mass of its host galaxy, in contrast to what is found in the local Universe wherein the BH mass is ~0.1% of the host galaxy’s stellar mass. The combination of such a high BH mass and large BH-to-galaxy stellar mass ratio just ~500 Myr after the Big Bang was theoretically predicted and is consistent with a picture wherein BHs originated from heavy seeds. A lensed quasar at redshift z ≈ 10.3, seen in X-rays, hosts a supermassive black hole of mass similar to that of its host galaxy. The large black-hole mass at a young age, as well as the amount of X-rays it produces, suggest that the black hole formed from the collapse of a huge cloud of gas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41550-023-02111-9

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Bogdán, Á., Goulding, A. D., Natarajan, P., Kovács, O. E., Tremblay, G. R., Chadayammuri, U., Volonteri, M., Kraft, R. P., Forman, W. R., Jones, C., Churazov, E., & Zhuravleva, I.
Venue
Nature Astronomy
Published
2023-11-06
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
126-133
ISSN
2397-3366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388410066
Cited by
279
References
41
FWCI
32.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for heavy-seed origin of early supermassive black holes from a z ≈ 10 X-ray quasar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41550-023-02111-9
The paper
Bogdán, Á., Goulding, A. D., Natarajan, P., Kovács, O. E., Tremblay, G. R., Chadayammuri, U., Volonteri, M., Kraft, R. P., Forman, W. R., Jones, C., Churazov, E., & Zhuravleva, I. (2023). Evidence for heavy-seed origin of early supermassive black holes from a z ≈ 10 X-ray quasar. Nature Astronomy. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02111-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.