The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Luminous Quasar at Redshift 7.642
Open accessAbstract
Distant quasars are unique tracers to study the formation of the earliest supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and the history of cosmic reionization. Despite extensive efforts, only two quasars have been found at z ≥ 7.5, due to a combination of their low spatial density and the high contamination rate in quasar selection. We report the discovery of a luminous quasar at z = 7.642, J0313−1806, the most distant quasar yet known. This quasar has a bolometric luminosity of 3.6 × 10 13 L ⊙. Deep spectroscopic observations reveal a SMBH with a mass of (1.6 ± 0.4) × 10 9 M ⊙ in this quasar. The existence of such a massive SMBH just ∼670 million years after the big bang challenges significantly theoretical models of SMBH growth. In addition, the quasar spectrum exhibits strong broad absorption line (BAL) features in C iv and Si iv, with a maximum velocity close to 20% of the speed of light. The relativistic BAL features, combined with a strongly blueshifted C iv emission line, indicate that there is a strong active galactic nucleus (AGN)-driven outflow in this system. Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array observations detect the dust continuum and [C ii] emission from the quasar host galaxy, yielding an accurate redshift of 7.6423 ± 0.0013 and suggesting that the quasar is hosted by an intensely star-forming galaxy, with a star formation rate of ∼200 M ⊙ yr−1 and a dust mass of ∼7 × 10 7 M ⊙. Follow-up observations of this reionization-era BAL quasar will provide a powerful probe of the effects of AGN feedback on the growth of the earliest massive galaxies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
The Assembly of the First Massive Black Holes
Inayoshi, K., Visbal, E., & Haiman, Z. (2020) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455 · Cited by 665
Cited by
Evidence for heavy-seed origin of early supermassive black holes from a z ≈ 10 X-ray quasar
Bogdán, Á., Goulding, A. D., Natarajan, P., Kovács, O. E., Tremblay, G. R., Chadayammuri, U., Volonteri, M., Kraft, R. P., Forman, W. R., Jones, C., et al. (2023) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02111-9 · Cited by 279
What drives the growth of black holes: A decade of progress
Alexander, D. M., Hickox, R. C., Aird, J., Combes, F., Costa, T., Habouzit, M., Harrison, C. M., Leng, R. I., Morabito, L. K., Uckelman, S. L., et al. (2025) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2025.101733 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, F., Yang, J., Fan, X., Hennawi, J. F., Barth, A. J., Banados, E., Bian, F., Boutsia, K., Connor, T., Davies, F. B., Decarli, R., Eilers, A.-C., Farina, E. P., Green, R., Jiang, L., Li, J.-T., Mazzucchelli, C., Nanni, R., Schindler, J.-T., Venemans, B., Walter, F., Wu, X.-B., & Yue, M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Letters
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2021-01-01
- Volume
- 907
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- L1
- ISSN
- 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-8213
- OpenAlex
- W3120032205
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 45.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Luminous Quasar at Redshift 7.642. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/2041-8213/abd8c6
- The paper
- Wang, F., Yang, J., Fan, X., Hennawi, J. F., Barth, A. J., Banados, E., Bian, F., Boutsia, K., Connor, T., Davies, F. B., Decarli, R., Eilers, A.-C., Farina, E. P., Green, R., Jiang, L., Li, J.-T., Mazzucchelli, C., Nanni, R., Schindler, J.-T., . . . Yue, M. (2021). A Luminous Quasar at Redshift 7.642. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abd8c6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.