Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 461

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Luminous Quasar at Redshift 7.642

Open access
Wang, Feige, Yang, Jinyi, Fan, Xiaohui, Hennawi, Joseph F., Barth, Aaron J., Banados, Eduardo, Bian, Fuyan, Boutsia, Konstantina, Connor, Thomas, Davies, Frederick B., Decarli, Roberto, Eilers, Anna-Christina, Farina, Emanuele Paolo, Green, Richard, Jiang, Linhua, Li, Jiang-Tao, Mazzucchelli, Chiara, Nanni, Riccardo, Schindler, Jan-Torge, Venemans, Bram, Walter, Fabian, Wu, Xue-Bing, Yue, Minghao·2021·The Astrophysical Journal Letters

Abstract

Distant quasars are unique tracers to study the formation of the earliest supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and the history of cosmic reionization. Despite extensive efforts, only two quasars have been found at z ≥ 7.5, due to a combination of their low spatial density and the high contamination rate in quasar selection. We report the discovery of a luminous quasar at z = 7.642, J0313−1806, the most distant quasar yet known. This quasar has a bolometric luminosity of 3.6 × 10 13 L ⊙. Deep spectroscopic observations reveal a SMBH with a mass of (1.6 ± 0.4) × 10 9 M ⊙ in this quasar. The existence of such a massive SMBH just ∼670 million years after the big bang challenges significantly theoretical models of SMBH growth. In addition, the quasar spectrum exhibits strong broad absorption line (BAL) features in C iv and Si iv, with a maximum velocity close to 20% of the speed of light. The relativistic BAL features, combined with a strongly blueshifted C iv emission line, indicate that there is a strong active galactic nucleus (AGN)-driven outflow in this system. Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array observations detect the dust continuum and [C ii] emission from the quasar host galaxy, yielding an accurate redshift of 7.6423 ± 0.0013 and suggesting that the quasar is hosted by an intensely star-forming galaxy, with a star formation rate of ∼200 M ⊙ yr−1 and a dust mass of ∼7 × 10 7 M ⊙. Follow-up observations of this reionization-era BAL quasar will provide a powerful probe of the effects of AGN feedback on the growth of the earliest massive galaxies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/2041-8213/abd8c6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 461

Metadata

Authors
Wang, F., Yang, J., Fan, X., Hennawi, J. F., Barth, A. J., Banados, E., Bian, F., Boutsia, K., Connor, T., Davies, F. B., Decarli, R., Eilers, A.-C., Farina, E. P., Green, R., Jiang, L., Li, J.-T., Mazzucchelli, C., Nanni, R., Schindler, J.-T., Venemans, B., Walter, F., Wu, X.-B., & Yue, M.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Published
2021-01-01
Volume
907
Issue
1
Pages
L1
ISSN
  • 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-8213
OpenAlex
W3120032205
Cited by
461
References
2
FWCI
45.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Luminous Quasar at Redshift 7.642. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/2041-8213/abd8c6
The paper
Wang, F., Yang, J., Fan, X., Hennawi, J. F., Barth, A. J., Banados, E., Bian, F., Boutsia, K., Connor, T., Davies, F. B., Decarli, R., Eilers, A.-C., Farina, E. P., Green, R., Jiang, L., Li, J.-T., Mazzucchelli, C., Nanni, R., Schindler, J.-T., . . . Yue, M. (2021). A Luminous Quasar at Redshift 7.642. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abd8c6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.