Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,295

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

CIAO: Chandra's data analysis system

Fruscione, Antonella, McDowell, Jonathan C., Allen, Glenn E., Brickhouse, Nancy S., Burke, Douglas J., Davis, John E., Durham, Nick, Elvis, Martin, Galle, Elizabeth C., Harris, Daniel E., Huenemoerder, David P., Houck, John C., Ishibashi, Bish, Karovska, Margarita, Nicastro, Fabrizio, Noble, Michael S., Nowak, Michael A., Primini, Frank A., Siemiginowska, Aneta, Smith, Randall K., Wise, Michael·2006·SPIE Proceedings

Abstract

The CIAO (Chandra Interactive Analysis of Observations) software package was first released in 1999 following the launch of the Chandra X-ray Observatory and is used by astronomers across the world to analyze Chandra data as well as data from other telescopes. From the earliest design discussions, CIAO was planned as a general-purpose scientific data analysis system optimized for X-ray astronomy, and consists mainly of command line tools (allowing easy pipelining and scripting) with a parameter-based interface layered on a flexible data manipulation I/O library. The same code is used for the standard Chandra archive pipeline, allowing users to recalibrate their data in a consistent way. We will discuss the lessons learned from the first six years of the software's evolution. Our initial approach to documentation evolved to concentrate on recipe-based "threads" which have proved very successful. A multi-dimensional abstract approach to data analysis has allowed new capabilities to be added while retaining existing interfaces. A key requirement for our community was interoperability with other data analysis systems, leading us to adopt standard file formats and an architecture which was as robust as possible to the input of foreign data files, as well as re-using a number of external libraries. We support users who are comfortable with coding themselves via a flexible user scripting paradigm, while the availability of tightly constrained pipeline programs are of benefit to less computationally-advanced users. As with other analysis systems, we have found that infrastructure maintenance and re-engineering is a necessary and significant ongoing effort and needs to be planned in to any long-lived astronomy software.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.671760

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,295

Metadata

Authors
Fruscione, A., McDowell, J. C., Allen, G. E., Brickhouse, N. S., Burke, D. J., Davis, J. E., Durham, N., Elvis, M., Galle, E. C., Harris, D. E., Huenemoerder, D. P., Houck, J. C., Ishibashi, B., Karovska, M., Nicastro, F., Noble, M. S., Nowak, M. A., Primini, F. A., Siemiginowska, A., Smith, R. K., & Wise, M.
Venue
SPIE Proceedings
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2006-06-14
Volume
6270
Pages
62701V
ISSN
0277-786X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1549029104
Cited by
1,295
References
0
FWCI
11.36
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CIAO: Chandra's data analysis system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/12.671760
The paper
Fruscione, A., McDowell, J. C., Allen, G. E., Brickhouse, N. S., Burke, D. J., Davis, J. E., Durham, N., Elvis, M., Galle, E. C., Harris, D. E., Huenemoerder, D. P., Houck, J. C., Ishibashi, B., Karovska, M., Nicastro, F., Noble, M. S., Nowak, M. A., Primini, F. A., Siemiginowska, A., . . . Wise, M. (2006). CIAO: Chandra's data analysis system. SPIE Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.671760

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.