Cited by 145CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseCAR-T cell therapy research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-throughput analysis of the activities of xCas9, SpCas9-NG and SpCas9 at matched and mismatched target sequences in human cells

Open access

Abstract

The applications of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based genome editing can be limited by a lack of compatible protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs), insufficient on-target activity and off-target effects. Here, we report an extensive comparison of the PAM-sequence compatibilities and the on-target and off-target activities of Cas9 from Streptococcus pyogenes (SpCas9) and the SpCas9 variants xCas9 and SpCas9-NG (which are known to have broader PAM compatibility than SpCas9) at 26,478 lentivirally integrated target sequences and 78 endogenous target sites in human cells. We found that xCas9 has the lowest tolerance for mismatched target sequences and that SpCas9-NG has the broadest PAM compatibility. We also show, on the basis of newly identified non-NGG PAM sequences, that SpCas9-NG and SpCas9 can edit six previously unedited endogenous sites associated with genetic diseases. Moreover, we provide deep-learning models that predict the activities of xCas9 and SpCas9-NG at the target sequences. The resulting deeper understanding of the activities of xCas9, SpCas9-NG and SpCas9 in human cells should facilitate their use.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41551-019-0505-1

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Abadi, M. et al. In Proc. 12th USENIX Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation 265–283 (USENIX Association, 2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–145 of 145

Metadata

Authors
Kim, H. K., Lee, S., Kim, Y., Park, J., Min, S., Choi, J. W., Huang, T. P., Yoon, S., Liu, D. R., & Kim, H. H.
Affiliations
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Venue
Nature Biomedical Engineering
Published
2020-01-14
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
111-124
ISSN
2157-846X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2999201570
Cited by
145
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 17
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (RM1 HG009490, R01 EB022376, R35 GM118062)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (David Liu)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (2017R1A2B3004198, 2017M3A9B4062403, 2018R1A5A2025079)
  • Ministry of Health and Welfare (HI17C0676, HI16C1012)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
Keywords
SpCas9, protospacer adjacent motif, on-target activity, off-target effects, CRISPR gene editing
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, CRISPR-Associated Protein 9, Deep Learning, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Streptococcus pyogenes, Lentivirus, HEK293 Cells, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review