The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-throughput analysis of the activities of xCas9, SpCas9-NG and SpCas9 at matched and mismatched target sequences in human cells
Open accessAbstract
The applications of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based genome editing can be limited by a lack of compatible protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs), insufficient on-target activity and off-target effects. Here, we report an extensive comparison of the PAM-sequence compatibilities and the on-target and off-target activities of Cas9 from Streptococcus pyogenes (SpCas9) and the SpCas9 variants xCas9 and SpCas9-NG (which are known to have broader PAM compatibility than SpCas9) at 26,478 lentivirally integrated target sequences and 78 endogenous target sites in human cells. We found that xCas9 has the lowest tolerance for mismatched target sequences and that SpCas9-NG has the broadest PAM compatibility. We also show, on the basis of newly identified non-NGG PAM sequences, that SpCas9-NG and SpCas9 can edit six previously unedited endogenous sites associated with genetic diseases. Moreover, we provide deep-learning models that predict the activities of xCas9 and SpCas9-NG at the target sequences. The resulting deeper understanding of the activities of xCas9, SpCas9-NG and SpCas9 in human cells should facilitate their use.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The “OFF-target” library contained thousands of known off-target sites: 431 off target sites of 13 gRNAs detected by GUIDE-seq or Digenome-seq, 805 gRNA-target pairs of 3 gRNAs evaluated by similarly oligonucleotide synthesis method.”
From Machine learning-based prediction models to guide the selection of Cas9 variants for efficient gene editing (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“Although some Cas9 variants have comparable editing activity and specificity with SpCas9 at a few target sites, high-throughput analysis is still lacking.”
From Machine learning-based prediction models to guide the selection of Cas9 variants for efficient gene editing (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“Across all four Cas9 variants and WT Cas9, the wobble transition was more tolerated, which was reflected by higher relative indel frequency compared to other mismatch types (Figure 3C).”
From Machine learning-based prediction models to guide the selection of Cas9 variants for efficient gene editing (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cites
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232033 · Cited by 9,210
2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
(2017) · doi:10.1109/cvpr35066.2017 · Cited by 7,284
The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9
Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1258096 · Cited by 7,062
Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering
Hsu, P. D., Lander, E. S., & Zhang, F. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010 · Cited by 5,762
Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage
Komor, A. C., Kim, Y. B., Packer, M. S., Zuris, J. A., & Liu, D. R. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17946 · Cited by 5,437
Self-citationGenome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells
Shalem, O., Sanjana, N. E., Hartenian, E., Shi, X., Scott, D. A., Mikkelsen, T. S., Heckl, D., Ebert, B. L., Root, D. E., Doench, J. G., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1247005 · Cited by 5,234
Cpf1 Is a Single RNA-Guided Endonuclease of a Class 2 CRISPR-Cas System
Zetsche, B., Gootenberg, J. S., Abudayyeh, O. O., Slaymaker, I. M., Makarova, K. S., Essletzbichler, P., Volz, S. E., Joung, J., van der Oost, J., Regev, A., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038 · Cited by 4,761
DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases
Hsu, P. D., Scott, D. A., Weinstein, J. A., Ran, F. A., Konermann, S., Agarwala, V., Li, Y., Fine, E. J., Wu, X., Shalem, O., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2647 · Cited by 4,741
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Abadi, M. et al. In Proc. 12th USENIX Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation 265–283 (USENIX Association, 2016).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–145 of 145
Predicting exon criticality from protein sequence
Desai, J. S., Francis, C., Longo, K. A., & Hoss, A. G. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac155 · Cited by 2
Bellingrath, J.-S., McClements, M. E., Shanks, M. E., Clouston, P., Fischer, M. D., & MacLaren, R. E. (2022) · Ophthalmic Genetics · doi:10.1080/13816810.2022.2073599 · Cited by 3
CRISPR/Cas9-based Engineering of Immunoglobulin Loci in Hybridoma Cells
Gall, C. M. L., Fennemann, F. L., van der Schoot, J. M. S., Scheeren, F. A., & Verdoes, M. (2023) · BIO-PROTOCOL · doi:10.21769/bioprotoc.4613 · Cited by 3
“Here, we used a 20 nt gRNA, but it was recently proposed to use a 19 nt gRNA for improved efficiency (Kim et al., 2020).”
MethodEx vivo gene therapy for lysosomal storage disorders: future perspectives
Poletto, É., Silva, A. O., Weinlich, R., Martin, P. K. M., Torres, D. C., Giugliani, R., & Baldo, G. (2023) · Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy · doi:10.1080/14712598.2023.2192348 · Cited by 3
“engineered Cas variants with broadened and less strict PAM compatibility made virtually any genomic sequence accessible for gene editing [24].”
BackgroundXiang, X., Qu, K., Liang, X., Pan, X., Wang, J., Han, P., Dong, Z., Liu, L., Zhong, J., Ma, T., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.05.20.103614 · Cited by 4
“Recent 569 studies published by other groups have demonstrated that the surrogate target sites can well mimic 570 the SpCas9 indel outcomes at the corresponding endogenous sites, and thus predict the SpCas9 indel 571 profile for a given gRNA in cells [26, 28, 40].”
BackgroundMethodHow CRISPR Is Revolutionizing the Generation of New Models for Cancer ResearchPreprint
Rivera, F. J. S., & Dow, L. E. (2023) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a041384 · Cited by 4
ARROW: Allele-Specific Recombined gRNA Design for Reduced Off-Target with Enhanced Specificity
Bae, T., Been, K. W., Kang, S., Hong, S., Hur, J. K., & Hwang, W. (2025) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering12111237 · Cited by 2
Su, T., Guo, Q. J., Zheng, Y., Chang, Y., Gu, F., Lu, X., & Qi, Q. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102769 · Cited by 2
A Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Classification of Diverse Base Editors
Tran, M. T. N., Rajendra, K. C., & Hewitt, A. W. (2022) · The CRISPR Journal · doi:10.1089/crispr.2021.0095 · Cited by 2
Yeo, J. H., Lee, S., Kim, S., Min, J.-G., Gopalappa, R., Oh, H.-C., Kim, H. K., Nam, E.-J., & Kim, S. (2025) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-025-01535-0 · Cited by 1
“Moreover, we considered the counts of mismatches, RNA bulges and DNA bulges in specific regions defined by both in vitro sgRNA activity (positions 1–6, 7–13, 14–17 and 18–19) and sgRNA activity in cultured cells (positions 1–3, 4–8, 9–15 and 16–20) 4,54 .”
Optimizing prime editing: Advances in efficiency enhancement
Qu, Y., Li, Y., Shao, T., Kuang, J., Qi, Y., Yang, J., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Fu, X., Liu, J., et al. (2026) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2026.108815 · Cited by 1
How Genomic and Structural Context Could Shape JAK-STAT Variant Pathogenicity
Hoffmann, M., & Lee, H. (2026) · Twin Research and Human Genetics · doi:10.1017/thg.2026.10054 · Cited by 1
“Table 2) (Acharya et al., 2024; Du et al., 2023; Guo et al., 2019; Hibshman et al., 2024; Hou et al., 2013; Ikeda et al., 2019; H. K. Kim et al., 2020; Liang et al., 2022; Müller et al., 2016; Schmidheini et al., 2024; Slaymaker et al., 2016; Vakulskas et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2020; Yifei Zhang et…”
An Investigation of Post-radiation Gene Expression Profiles: A System Biology Study
Vafaee, R., Nikzamir, A., Razzaghi, M., Tavirani, S. R., Ahmadzadeh, A., & Emamhadi, M. A. (2020) · Journal of lasers in medical sciences · doi:10.34172/jlms.2020.s16 · Cited by 1
A Manual for Genome and Transcriptome Engineering
Doctor, Y., Sanghvi, M., & Mali, P. (2024) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2024.3494715 · Cited by 1
Modulation of CRISPR‐Cas9 Cleavage with an Oligo‐Ribonucleoprotein Design
Gao, Y., Ang, Y. S., & Yung, L. Y. L. (2025) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.202400821 · Cited by 1
Engineering Microbial Strains and Enzymes for Enhanced Productivity
Ametefe, G. D., Oluyide, O. O., Itakorode, B. O., Muritala, I., Oyedara, O. O., & Ametefe, D. S. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-2786-8_8 · Cited by 1
Genome Editing and Identification of Targeted Heritable Mutations in Wheat
Milner, M. J., & Wallington, E. J. (2021) · Springer protocols handbooks/Springer protocols · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1526-3_11 · Cited by 1
Marsiglia, J. D. C., Vaalavirta, K., Knight, E., Nakamura, M., Cong, L., & Hughes, N. W. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.12.13.571376 · Cited by 1
“Therefore, there have been extensive efforts to mitigate off-target effects through (1) computational predictions of off-target regions based on the sgRNA sequence 12,13 and (2) engineering of the sgRNA and Cas nuclease components 14–17 .”
BackgroundMak, J. K., & Mináry, P. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.08.681228 · Cited by 1
“Similar to DeepSpCas9, DeepxCas9 and DeepSpCas9-NG [141] are CNN models which predict xCas9 and SpCas9-NG activity, respectively, for matched G/gN 19 interfaces.”
InfluentialAdvances and application of CRISPR-Cas systems
Liu, R., Liang, L., Habib, M., Freed, E. F., & Eckert, C. A. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-824469-2.00029-4
Development and Vision of CRISPR-Based Technology
Zhang, Z., Wang, P., & Liu, J. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-8504-0_1
Challenges and Limitations of the Lymphatic Drug Delivery Systems
Khademi, Z., Mottaghi-Dastjerdi, N., Morad, H., Hedayati, N., & Sharafi, A. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-64828-1_22
Rational Design of Enhanced Nme2Cas9 and Nme2 Smu Cas9 Nucleases and Base EditorsPreprint
Bamidele, N., Ansodaria, A. V., Chen, Z., Cheng, H., Panwala, R., Jazbec, E., & Sontheimer, E. J. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.10.30.620986
A strategy for genome-wide seamless tagging of human protein-coding genesPreprint
González, L., Karimi, M., Castellanos-Girouard, X., Saber, M. M., Stifani, N., Gauthier, L., Serohijos, A. W. R., & Michnick, S. W. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.03.04.641506
The identification of functional regions of MEK1 using CRISPR tiling screens
Zhang, Z., Abreu, B., Brothwood, J. L., Alexander, J. J., Sims, M., Lyons, J. F., Munck, J. M., & Hindley, C. J. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-07966-4 · Cited by 1
“Using PAM-fl exible Cas9 nucleases 50 – 52 will improve the coverage and hopefully increase the sensitivity for region identi fi cation.”
CrisprDA: A Data Augmentation Method Enhancing the Efficiency of sgRNA on-Target Activity Prediction
Chen, H., & Jiang, Z. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbbio.2025.3591871
“Representative convolutional neural network (CNN) models include Deep-CRISPR [7], DeepCas9 [8], DeepSpCas9 [9], DeepXCas9 [10], CRISPRon [11], CNN-XG [12], and the recurrent neural network (RNN) variant DeepHF [13] and Deep-CRISTL [14].”
Wei, G., Jing, Z., Wang, W., Liu, B., Mao, S., Lv, J., Zhang, X., Cao, D., Sun, R., Liang, A., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.07.24.666689
“First, the false negative rates are acceptable but still much higher than false positive (1/10 vs 1/590 in iMAP-61), which can be minimized by guide pre-validation via high-throughput screening ( 52 ).”
Sen, P., Ansari, R., Chatterjee, A., Mondal, B., Sengupta, S., Ghorai, S., Bose, S., & Hazra, S. (2025) · Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12892-025-00301-7
CRISPR-Cas9 Technology for Epigenome Editing in Precision Medicine
Nidhilangelo, M. M., & Kumavath, R. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-4857-5.ch009
Choi, J.-H., Moon, J., Oh, Y., Klompstra, T. M., Kim, Y. W., Baek, G., Kwak, Y., Kim, Y. W., Lee, S., Park, S., et al. (2026) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkag480
“The scope of targetable genes can be extended by using Cas9 with a broader PAM sequence, such as xCas9 and SpCas9-NG [ 49 ].”
TAMIPAMI: Software and methods for PAM/TAM identification in CRISPR and OMEGA gene editing systemsPreprint
Orosco, C., Jain, P., & Rivers, A. R. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.15.725432
“The counts from the sequencing experiments are compositional count data 17,20 and exist in the simplex number space.”
Gene therapy development for retinal diseases
Reichel, F. F., Bellingrath, J.-S., Király, P., & FISCHER, M. D. (2026) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-22212-2.00016-1
CrisprFusion: A feature fusion model with multi-type input features for sgRNA activity prediction
Chen, H., & Jiang, Z. (2026) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2026.109137
Shin, K., Shin, J.-Y., Woo, A., Han, D., Lee, B., & Kim, H. K. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10000319/v1
Zhu, W., Tian, M., Duan, Y., Reisman, S. J., Miller, S. E., Corden, E., ter Weele, M. A., Song, L., Blount, J., Safi, A., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.08.10.743836
Carballar-Lejarazu, R., McNeely, B., Dong, Y., Pham, T. B., Tushar, T., Owusu-Frimpong, I., Dimopoulos, G., & James, A. A. (2026) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyag221
“Studies using cultured human cells have shown that Cas9 cleavage is affected strongly by the position and sequence of target-site/gRNA mismatches (Hsu et al. 2013; Kim et al. 2020).”
AI and next-generation gene editing tools
Raza, M. Z., Khursheed, H., Ali, Q., Liu, Y., Riaz, M., Al‐Harrasi, A., & Ahmad, A. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-44079-3.00011-5
Intelligent gene editing for stress tolerance in plants
Tilgam, J., Begam, S., Jayaswal, D., Jayaswall, K., Das, J., & Kumar, R. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-44079-3.00025-5
AI for accurate prediction of on-target efficiency and minimization of off-targets in plants
Cheng, M., Previtera, D. A., Zhang, Y., & Gong, Z. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-44079-3.00002-4
Cross-target and cell-preferential CRISPR-Cas9 inhibition with carbohydrate-tagged oligonucleotides
Li, B., Wang, S., Cao, M., Ma, S., Wang, X., Yang, G., Wu, J., & Zhang, X. (2026) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2026.08.014
The CRISPR/Cas technology landscape: From molecular mechanisms to multidisciplinary applications
Liu, Z., Yang, Y., Li, Z., Li, P., Jia, J., Qiao, X., Su, Y., Qin, Y., Wang, H., Dai, Y., et al. (2026) · Genes & Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2026.102484
CRISPR/Cas based genome editing for liver diseases: Promise and challenge
Guan, J., Yang, M., Yang, X., He, Q., Wang, B., & Zhan, C. (2026) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2026.09.027
In Vitro Chromosome Translocations: Modeling Critical Drivers of Human Neoplasms
Tynyshtykbayeva, N., Varga, K., Lukácsi, S., & Fábián, Z. (2026) · Current Issues in Molecular Biology · doi:10.3390/cimb48101032
“Introduction of promising new techniques, including the TIGR-Tas and re-lated RNA-guided systems may further expand programmable chromosome engineering in the future [110].”
Beyond prediction: The evolving role of artificial intelligence in genome editing
Shin, S., Uhm, H., Kim, Y.-W., Im, H. W., & Bae, S. (2026) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2026.08.025
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, H. K., Lee, S., Kim, Y., Park, J., Min, S., Choi, J. W., Huang, T. P., Yoon, S., Liu, D. R., & Kim, H. H.
- Affiliations
- Yonsei University (KR)
- Seoul National University (KR)
- Broad Institute (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2020-01-14
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-124
- ISSN
- 2157-846X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2999201570
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 17
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion)
- YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (RM1 HG009490, R01 EB022376, R35 GM118062)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (David Liu)
- National Research Foundation of Korea (2017R1A2B3004198, 2017M3A9B4062403, 2018R1A5A2025079)
- Ministry of Health and Welfare (HI17C0676, HI16C1012)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
- Keywords
- SpCas9, protospacer adjacent motif, on-target activity, off-target effects, CRISPR gene editing
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, CRISPR-Associated Protein 9, Deep Learning, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Streptococcus pyogenes, Lentivirus, HEK293 Cells, CRISPR-Cas Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review