Cited by 324Retinal Imaging and AnalysisArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareOphthalmology and Visual Health Research

Deep-learning models for the detection and incidence prediction of chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes from retinal fundus images

Zhang, Kang, Liu, Xiaohong, Xu, Jie, Yuan, Jin, Cai, Wenjia, Chen, Ting, Wang, Kai, Gao, Yuanxu +36 more·2021·Nature Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Regular screening for the early detection of common chronic diseases might benefit from the use of deep-learning approaches, particularly in resource-poor or remote settings. Here we show that deep-learning models can be used to identify chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes solely from fundus images or in combination with clinical metadata (age, sex, height, weight, body-mass index and blood pressure) with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85-0.93. The models were trained and validated with a total of 115,344 retinal fundus photographs from 57,672 patients and can also be used to predict estimated glomerulal filtration rates and blood-glucose levels, with mean absolute errors of 11.1-13.4 ml min -1 per 1.73 m 2 and 0.65-1.1 mmol l -1 , and to stratify patients according to disease-progression risk. We evaluated the generalizability of the models for the identification of chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes with population-based external validation cohorts and via a prospective study with fundus images captured with smartphones, and assessed the feasibility of predicting disease progression in a longitudinal cohort.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41551-021-00745-6

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Retinal images were used to predict the incidence and progression of chronic kidney disease and diabetic retinopathy.

    “Recently, retinal images were used to predict the incidence and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD)39 and diabetic retinopathy (DR).101,102”
  • For CKD and diabetic nephropathy screening, studies utilized clinical data, metabolic biomarkers, genotyping data, and/or retinal images to achieve AUCs generally over 0.8.

    “For CKD39,110,111 and diabetic nephropathy112,113 screening, studies utilized clinical data, metabolic biomarkers, genotyping data, and/or retinal images to achieve AUCs generally over 0.8.”
  • Zhang et al. reported that a CNN using retinal images and risk factors for CKD screening could identify CKD solely from fundus images or in combination with clinical metadata with AUCs of 0.85-0.93.

    “the system could be used to identify CKD solely from fundus images or in combination with clinical metadata with AUCs of 0.85–0.93”
  • Zhang et al. reported that a CNN using retinal images and risk factors to predict development of chronic kidney disease achieved a C index of 0.845 on the internal test set and 0.719 on the external test set.

    “the combined model could achieve a C index of 0.845 on the internal test set and 0.719 on the external test set”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, K., Liu, X., Xu, J., Yuan, J., Cai, W., Chen, T., Wang, K., Gao, Y., Nie, S., Xu, X., Qin, X., Su, Y., Xu, W., Olvera, A., Xue, K., Li, Z., Zhang, M., Zeng, X., Zhang, C. L., Li, O., Zhang, E. E., Zhu, J., Xu, Y., Kermany, D., Zhou, K., Pan, Y., Li, S., Lai, I. F., Chi, Y., Wang, C., Pei, M., Zang, G., Zhang, Q., Lau, J., Lam, D., Zou, X., Wumaier, A., Wang, J., Shen, Y., Hou, F. F., Zhang, P., Xu, T., Zhou, Y., & Wang, G.
Affiliations
  • Macau University of Science and Technology (MO)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Beijing Tongren Hospital (CN)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • Nanfang Hospital (CN)
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Guangzhou University (CN)
  • Guangzhou Women and Children Medical Center (CN)
  • Jiangsu University (CN)
  • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Kiang Wu Hospital (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Kang
  • Chen, Ting
  • Xu, Tao
  • Zhou, Yong
  • Wang, Guangyu
Venue
Nature Biomedical Engineering
Published
2021-06-15
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
533-545
ISSN
2157-846X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3168947860
Cited by
324
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 10
FWCI
26.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (216593/Z/19/Z)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
Keywords
chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, fundus images, deep learning, disease detection, incidence forecasting, estimated glomerular filtration rate, blood glucose prediction, disease progression risk stratification, clinical metadata, external validation, resource-limited settings
MeSH terms
Metadata, Deep Learning, Blood Glucose, Body Height, Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Fundus Oculi, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Male, Middle Aged, Photography, Prospective Studies, Retina, ROC Curve, Body Mass Index, Neural Networks, Computer, Disease Progression, Area Under Curve, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review