The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep-neural-network solution of the electronic Schrödinger equation
Open accessAbstract
The electronic Schrödinger equation can only be solved analytically for the hydrogen atom, and the numerically exact full configuration-interaction method is exponentially expensive in the number of electrons. Quantum Monte Carlo methods are a possible way out: they scale well for large molecules, they can be parallelized and their accuracy has, as yet, been only limited by the flexibility of the wavefunction ansatz used. Here we propose PauliNet, a deep-learning wavefunction ansatz that achieves nearly exact solutions of the electronic Schrödinger equation for molecules with up to 30 electrons. PauliNet has a multireference Hartree–Fock solution built in as a baseline, incorporates the physics of valid wavefunctions and is trained using variational quantum Monte Carlo. PauliNet outperforms previous state-of-the-art variational ansatzes for atoms, diatomic molecules and a strongly correlated linear H 10 , and matches the accuracy of highly specialized quantum chemistry methods on the transition-state energy of cyclobutadiene, while being computationally efficient. High-accuracy quantum chemistry methods struggle with a combinatorial explosion of Slater determinants in larger molecular systems, but now a method has been developed that learns electronic wavefunctions with deep neural networks and reaches high accuracy with only a few determinants. The method is applicable to realistic chemical processes such as the automerization of cyclobutadiene.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast and Accurate Modeling of Molecular Atomization Energies with Machine Learning
Rupp, M., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K.-R., & von Lilienfeld, O. A. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.058301 · Cited by 2,312
Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks
Carleo, G., & Troyer, M. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aag2302 · Cited by 2,215
ANI-1: an extensible neural network potential with DFT accuracy at force field computational cost
Smith, J. S., Isayev, O., & Roitberg, A. E. (2017) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c6sc05720a · Cited by 1,921
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- Piela, L. Ideas of Quantum Chemistry 2nd edn (Elsevier, 2014).
- Morales, M. A., McMinis, J., Clark, B. K., Kim, J. & Scuseria, G. E. Multideterminant wave functions in quantum Monte Carlo. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 2181–2188 (2012). · DOI
- Troyer, M. & Wiese, U.-J. Computational complexity and fundamental limitations to fermionic quantum Monte Carlo simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 170201 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
- Shavitt, I. & Bartlett, R. J. Many-Body Methods in Chemistry and Physics: MBPT and Coupled-Cluster Theory (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009). · DOI · Paper page
- Booth, G. H., Thom, A. J. W. & Alavi, A. Fermion Monte Carlo without fixed nodes: a game of life, death, and annihilation in Slater determinant space. J. Chem. Phys. 131, 054106 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
- Thom, A. J. W. Stochastic coupled cluster theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 263004 (2010). · DOI
- Choo, K., Mezzacapo, A. & Carleo, G. Fermionic neural-network states for ab-initio electronic structure. Nat. Commun. 11, 2368 (2020). · DOI
- Foulkes, W. M. C., Mitas, L., Needs, R. J. & Rajagopal, G. Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 33–83 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
- Needs, R. J., Towler, M. D., Drummond, N. D. & Ríos, P. L. Continuum variational and diffusion quantum Monte Carlo calculations. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 023201 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
- Austin, B. M., Zubarev, D. Y. & Lester, W. A. Quantum Monte Carlo and related approaches. Chem. Rev. 112, 263–288 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
- Ambrosetti, A., Alfè, D., DiStasio, R. A. Jr & Tkatchenko, A. Hard numbers for large molecules: toward exact energetics for supramolecular systems. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 849–855 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- Zen, A. et al. Fast and accurate quantum Monte Carlo for molecular crystals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 1724–1729 (2018). · DOI
- López Ríos, P., Ma, A., Drummond, N. D., Towler, M. D. & Needs, R. J. Inhomogeneous backflow transformations in quantum Monte Carlo calculations. Phys. Rev. E 74, 066701 (2006). · doi:10.1103/physreve.74.066701
- Feynman, R. P. & Cohen, M. Energy spectrum of the excitations in liquid helium. Phys. Rev. 102, 1189–1204 (1956). · DOI · Paper page
- Schmidt, K. E. & Pandharipande, V. R. New variational wave function for liquid 3He. Phys. Rev. B 19, 2504–2519 (1979). · doi:10.1103/physrevb.19.2504
- Luo, D. & Clark, B. K. Backflow transformations via neural networks for quantum many-body wave functions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 226401 (2019). · DOI
- Behler, J. & Parrinello, M. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
- Chmiela, S. et al. Machine learning of accurate energy-conserving molecular force fields. Sci. Adv. 3, e1603015 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
- Bartók, A. P. et al. Machine learning unifies the modeling of materials and molecules. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701816 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
- Schütt, K. T., Sauceda, H. E., Kindermans, P.-J., Tkatchenko, A. & Müller, K.-R. SchNet — a deep learning architecture for molecules and materials. J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241722 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
- Faber, F. A., Christensen, A. S., Huang, B. & von Lilienfeld, O. A. Alchemical and structural distribution based representation for universal quantum machine learning. J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241717 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
- Welborn, M., Cheng, L. & Miller, T. F. Transferability in machine learning for electronic structure via the molecular orbital basis. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14, 4772–4779 (2018). · DOI
- Grisafi, A. et al. Transferable machine-learning model of the electron density. ACS Cent. Sci. 5, 57–64 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
- Schütt, K. T., Gastegger, M., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K.-R. & Maurer, R. J. Unifying machine learning and quantum chemistry with a deep neural network for molecular wavefunctions. Nat. Commun. 10, 5024 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
- Saito, H. Method to solve quantum few-body problems with artificial neural networks. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 87, 074002 (2018). · DOI
- Ruggeri, M., Moroni, S. & Holzmann, M. Nonlinear network description for many-body quantum systems in continuous space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 205302 (2018). · DOI
- Han, J., Zhang, L. & E, W. Solving many-electron Schrödinger equation using deep neural networks. J. Comput. Phys. 399, 108929 (2019). · DOI
- Pfau, D., Spencer, J. S., Matthews, A. G. d. G. & Foulkes, W. M. C. Ab-initio solution of the many-electron Schrödinger equation with deep neural networks. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.02487 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
- Brown, M. D., Trail, J. R., López Ríos, P. & Needs, R. J. Energies of the first row atoms from quantum Monte Carlo. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 224110 (2007). · DOI
- Kato, T. On the eigenfunctions of many-particle systems in quantum mechanics. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 10, 151–177 (1957). · DOI · Paper page
- Ma, A., Towler, M. D., Drummond, N. D. & Needs, R. J. Scheme for adding electron-nucleus cusps to Gaussian orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 122, 224322 (2005). · doi:10.1063/1.1940588
- Motta, M. et al. Towards the solution of the many-electron problem in real materials: equation of state of the hydrogen chain with state-of-the-art many-body methods. Phys. Rev. X 7, 031059 (2017).
- Lyakh, D. I., Musiał, M., Lotrich, V. F. & Bartlett, R. J. Multireference nature of chemistry: the coupled-cluster view. Chem. Rev. 112, 182–243 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
- Neuscamman, E., Umrigar, C. J. & Chan, G. K.-L. Optimizing large parameter sets in variational quantum Monte Carlo. Phys. Rev. B 85, 045103 (2012). · DOI
- Gasperich, K., Deible, M. & Jordan, K. D. H4: a model system for assessing the performance of diffusion Monte Carlo calculations using a single Slater determinant trial function. J. Chem. Phys. 147, 074106 (2017). · doi:10.1063/1.4986216
- Casalegno, M., Mella, M. & Rappe, A. M. Computing accurate forces in quantum Monte Carlo using Pulay’s corrections and energy minimization. J. Chem. Phys. 118, 7193 (2003). · doi:10.1063/1.1562605
- Seth, P., Ríos, P. L. & Needs, R. J. Quantum Monte Carlo study of the first-row atoms and ions. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 084105 (2011). · DOI
- Toulouse, J. & Umrigar, C. J. Full optimization of Jastrow–Slater wave functions with application to the first-row atoms and homonuclear diatomic molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 128, 174101 (2008). · doi:10.1063/1.2908237
- Filippi, C. & Umrigar, C. J. Multiconfiguration wave functions for quantum Monte Carlo calculations of first-row diatomic molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 105, 213–226 (1996). · DOI
- Umrigar, C. J., Nightingale, M. P. & Runge, K. J. A diffusion Monte Carlo algorithm with very small time-step errors. J. Chem. Phys. 99, 2865–2890 (1993). · DOI · Paper page
- Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2015); https://dblp.org/rec/journals/corr/KingmaB14.html
- Loshchilov, I. & Hutter, F. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In 7th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2019); https://openreview.net/forum?id=Bkg6RiCqY7
- Ceperley, D., Chester, G. V. & Kalos, M. H. Monte Carlo simulation of a many-fermion study. Phys. Rev. B 16, 3081–3099 (1977). · DOI · Paper page
- Smith, L. N. Cyclical learning rates for training neural networks. In Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision 464–472 (IEEE, 2017); https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7926641 · DOI · Paper page
- Unke, O. T. & Meuwly, M. PhysNet: a neural network for predicting energies, forces, dipole moments, and partial charges. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 3678–3693 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
- Paszke, A. et al. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 8026–8037 (Curran Associates, 2019); http://papers.nips.cc/paper/9015-pytorch-an-imperative-style-high-performance-deep-learning-library
- Sun, Q. et al. PySCF: the Python-based simulations of chemistry framework. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 8, e1340 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence.
Wang, H., Fu, T., Du, Y., Gao, W., Huang, K., Liu, Z., Chandak, P., Liu, S., Van Katwyk, P., Deac, A., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2 · Cited by 1,823
Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research
Xu, Y., Liu, X., Cao, X., Huang, C., Liu, E., Qian, S., Liu, X., Wu, Y., Dong, F., Qiu, C.-W., et al. (2021) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179 · Cited by 1,726
Unke, O. T., Chmiela, S., Sauceda, H. E., Gastegger, M., Poltavsky, I., Schütt, K. T., Tkatchenko, A., & Müller, K.-R. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01111 · Cited by 1,647
The Variational Quantum Eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices
Tilly, J., Chen, H., Cao, S., Picozzi, D., Setia, K., Li, Y., Grant, E., Wossnig, L., Rungger, I., Booth, G. H., et al. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.003 · Cited by 1,031
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Metadata
- Authors
- Hermann, J., Schätzle, Z., & Noé, F.
- Venue
- Nature Chemistry
- Published
- 2020-09-23
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 891-897
- ISSN
- 1755-4330 (ISSN-L)
- 1755-4349
- OpenAlex
- W2973805762
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- www.springer.com/tdm (vor)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.