The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A short peptide synthon for liquid–liquid phase separation
Open accessAbstract
Liquid–liquid phase separation of disordered proteins has emerged as a ubiquitous route to membraneless compartments in living cells, and similar coacervates may have played a role when the first cells formed. However, existing coacervates are typically made of multiple macromolecular components, and designing short peptide analogues capable of self-coacervation has proven difficult. Here we present a short peptide synthon for phase separation, made of only two dipeptide stickers linked via a flexible, hydrophilic spacer. These small-molecule compounds self-coacervate into micrometre-sized liquid droplets at sub-millimolar concentrations, which retain up to 75 wt% water. The design is general and we derive guidelines for the required sticker hydrophobicity and spacer polarity. To illustrate their potential as protocells, we create a disulfide-linked derivative that undergoes reversible compartmentalization controlled by redox chemistry. The resulting coacervates sequester and melt nucleic acids, and act as microreactors that catalyse two different anabolic reactions yielding molecules of increasing complexity. This provides a stepping stone for new coacervate-based protocells made of single peptide species. Liquid–liquid phase separation plays an important role in creating cellular compartments and protocells, but designing small-molecule models remains difficult. A peptide-based synthon for liquid–liquid phase separation consisting of two stickers and a flexible, polar spacer has now been presented. Condensates formed by these synthons can concentrate biomolecules and catalyse anabolic reactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Valence and patterning of aromatic residues determine the phase behavior of prion-like domains
Martin, E. W., Holehouse, A. S., Peran, I., Farag, M., Incicco, J. J., Bremer, A., Grace, C. R., Soranno, A., Pappu, R. V., & Mittag, T. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw8653 · Cited by 1,147
Experimental Models of Primitive Cellular Compartments: Encapsulation, Growth, and Division
Hanczyc, M. M., Fujikawa, S. M., & Szostak, J. W. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089904 · Cited by 848
Membrane self‐assembly processes: Steps toward the first cellular life
Monnard, P., & Deamer, D. W. (2002) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.10154 · Cited by 319
Cakmak, F. P., Choi, S., Meyer, M. O., Bevilacqua, P. C., & Keating, C. D. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19775-w · Cited by 185
Springsteen, G., Yerabolu, J. R., Nelson, J., Rhea, C. J., & Krishnamurthy, R. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02591-0 · Cited by 132
Evolution of oil droplets in a chemorobotic platform
Gutierrez, J. M. P., Hinkley, T., Taylor, J. W., Yanev, K., & Cronin, L. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6571 · Cited by 119
Cited by
Phase separation and ageing of glycine-rich protein from tick adhesive
Ganar, K. A., Nandy, M., Turbina, P., Chen, C., Suylen, D., Nihoul, E., Pascoe, E. L., van der Beelen, S., Plaum, M., van den Bos, L., et al. (2025) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41557-024-01686-8 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Abbas, M., Lipiński, W. P., Nakashima, K. K., Huck, W. T. S., & Spruijt, E.
- Venue
- Nature Chemistry
- Published
- 2021-10-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1046-1054
- ISSN
- 1755-4330 (ISSN-L)
- 1755-4349
- OpenAlex
- W3205791798
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 21.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.