Cited by 85Ecosystem dynamics and resilienceClimate variability and modelsSustainability and Climate Change Governance

Climate reddening increases the chance of critical transitions

Open access
van der Bolt, Bregje, van Nes, Egbert H., Bathiany, Sebastian, Vollebregt, Marlies E., Scheffer, Marten·2018·Nature Climate Change

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41558-018-0160-7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The intensification of the hydrological cycle as a result of warming of the atmosphere is well understood, and the effect has been detected in climatic time series for several decades.

    “But the intensification of the hydrological cycle as a result of warming of the atmosphere is well understood, and the effect has been detected in climatic time series for several decades.”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [83]

    The supplied passages are bibliographic material, not discussion of the hydrological cycle. Searches of the indexed copy for atmospheric warming, hydrological-cycle intensification, and detection in climatic time series found no passage addressing either part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Empirical evidence and model studies indicate a steeper increase in precipitation intensity than the Clausius-Clapeyron rate of 6-7% per degree K, particularly in dry regions.

    “Theoretically, the intensification is assumed to be at least linearly linked to warming at a rate of 6-7% per degree K (the Clausius-Clapeyron response), but empirical evidence and model studies indicate a steeper increase in precipitation intensity, particularly in dry regions (82,83).”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [83]

    The indexed passages labeled Abstract contain bibliographic information rather than the paper’s substantive text. Searches for precipitation intensity, the Clausius–Clapeyron rate, and dry regions found no passage addressing the claim, so our copy cannot verify it. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Bolt, B., van Nes, E. H., Bathiany, S., Vollebregt, M. E., & Scheffer, M.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Venue
Nature Climate Change
Published
2018-05-30
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
478-484
ISSN
  • 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-6798
OpenAlex
W2804086542
Cited by
85
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Keywords
tipping points, climate memory, temporal autocorrelation, climate variability, climate change, forests, coral reefs, poverty trap, violent conflict, ice sheet instability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review