Cited by 342Transboundary Water Resource ManagementPolitical Conflict and GovernanceClimate Change Policy and Economics

Climate, conflict, and social stability: what does the evidence say?

Open access
Hsiang, Solomon M., Burke, Marshall·2014·Climatic Change

Abstract

Are violent conflict and socio-political stability associated with changes in climatological variables? We examine 50 rigorous quantitative studies on this question and find consistent support for a causal association between climatological changes and various conflict outcomes, at spatial scales ranging from individual buildings to the entire globe and at temporal scales ranging from an anomalous hour to an anomalous millennium. Multiple mechanisms that could explain this association have been proposed and are sometimes supported by findings, but the literature is currently unable to decisively exclude any proposed pathway. Several mechanisms likely contribute to the outcomes that we observe.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10584-013-0868-3

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Harari M, La Ferrara E (2011) Conflict, climate and cells: a disaggregated analysis. SSRN. http://www-2.iies.su.se/Nobel2012/Papers/LaFerrara_Harari.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2012
  2. IPCC (2012) SREX special report. Cambridge

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsiang, S. M., & Burke, M.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Hsiang, Solomon M.
Venue
Climatic Change
Published
2013-10-17
Volume
123
Issue
1
Pages
39-55
ISSN
  • 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1480
OpenAlex
W2137983397
Cited by
342
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
56.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Climatic Change (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Department of Energy and Climate Change
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Transboundary Water Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
climate change, violent conflict, socio-political stability, climate-conflict nexus, causal mechanisms, social stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review