The development of partisan polarization over the Green New Deal
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Frequent use of the right-wing Fox News channel predicted stronger opposition to the Green New Deal among the Republican audience.
“Frequent use of the right-wing Fox News channel predicted stronger opposition to the Green New Deal among the Republican audience.”
From When debates break apart: discursive polarization as a multi-dimensional divergence emerging in and through communication (2023) · cites this paper as Gustafson et al. (2019)
Cites
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785 · see citing works
Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., & Maibach, E. (2017) · Global Challenges · doi:10.1002/gch2.201600008 · Cited by 1,058 · see citing works
Self-citationThe evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation
Druckman, J. N., & McGrath, M. C. (2019) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brüggemann, M., & Meyer, H. (2023) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtad012 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gustafson, A., Rosenthal, S. A., Ballew, M. T., Goldberg, M. H., Bergquist, P., Kotcher, J. E., Maibach, E. W., & Leiserowitz, A.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- George Mason University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gustafson, Abel
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Climate Change
- Published
- 2019-11-18
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 940-944
- ISSN
- 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-6798
- OpenAlex
- W2987683648
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 11
- FWCI
- 59.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Keywords
- Green New Deal, partisan polarization, climate policy, public opinion, Fox News, conservative media, support for democracy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
