Cited by 481Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesMarine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Global hotspots and correlates of alien species richness across taxonomic groups

Open access
Dawson, Wayne, Moser, Dietmar, van Kleunen, Mark, Kreft, Holger, Pergl, Jan, Pyšek, Petr, Weigelt, Patrick, Winter, Marten +17 more·2017·Nature Ecology & Evolution

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41559-017-0186

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Globally, islands and coastal mainland regions are hotspots of established alien species richness across multiple taxonomic groups.

    “Globally, a recent analysis revealed that islands and coastal mainland regions are hotspots of established alien species richness across multiple taxonomic groups (Dawson et al., 2017; Fig. 1).”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Dawson et al., 2017

  • Comprehensive accounts are now available on established and/or invasive alien species of vascular plants, bryophytes, terrestrial snails, ants, spiders, fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals.

    “Comprehensive accounts are now available on established and/or invasive alien species of vascular plants (van Kleunen et al., 2015, 2019; Pyšek et al., 2017b ), bryophytes (Essl et al., 2015), terrestrial snails (Capinha et al., 2015), ants, spiders [see Dawson et al., 2017 and references therein], fishes (Tedesco et al., 2017), amphibians (Capinha et al., 2017), reptiles (Kraus, 2009, 2015; Capin”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Dawson et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. di Castri, F. in Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective (eds Drake, J. A. et al.) 1-30 (Wiley, 1989).
  2. Essl, F. et al. Socioeconomic legacy yields and invasion debt. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 203-207 (2011).
  3. Dyer, E. E. et al. The global distribution and drivers of alien bird species richness. PLoS Biol. 15, e2000942 (2017).
  4. Meyer, C., Kreft, H., Guralnick, R. & Jetz, W. Global priorities for an effective information basis of biodiversity distributions. Nat. Commun. 6, 8221 (2015).
  5. Guénard, B., Weiser, M. D. & Dunn, R. R. Global models of ant diversity suggest regions where new discoveries are most likely are under disproportionate deforestation threat. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7368-7373 (2012).
  6. Pyšek, P. et al. Disentangling the role of environmental and human pressures on biological invasions across Europe. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12157-12162 (2010).
  7. Genovesi, P., Bacher, S., Kobelt, M., Pascal, M. & Scalera, R. in Handbook of Alien Species in Europe (eds DAISIE) 119-128 (Springer, 2009).
  8. Lever, C. in Encyclopedia of Biological Invasions (eds Simberloff, D. & Rejmánek, M.) 1-4 (Univ. California Press, 2011).
  9. Dyer, E. E., Redding, D. W. & Blackburn, T. M. The global avian invasions atlas, a database of alien bird distributions worldwide. Sci. Data 4, 170041 (2017).
  10. Espinosa-Perez, H. & Ramirez, M. Exotic and invasive fishes in Mexico. Check List 11, 1627 (2015).
  11. Ellender, B. R. & Weyl, O. L. F. A review of current knowledge, risk and ecological impacts associated with non-native freshwater fish introductions in South Africa. Aquat. Invasions 9, 117-132 (2014).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dawson, W., Moser, D., van Kleunen, M., Kreft, H., Pergl, J., Pyšek, P., Weigelt, P., Winter, M., Lenzner, B., Blackburn, T. M., Dyer, E. E., Cassey, P., Scrivens, S. L., Economo, E. P., Guénard, B., Capinha, C., Seebens, H., García-Díaz, P., Nentwig, W., García-Berthou, E., Casal, C., Mandrak, N. E., Fuller, P., Meyer, C., & Essl, F.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
  • German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE)
  • Zoological Society of London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (JP)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (DE)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • International Rice Research Institute (PH)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Dawson, Wayne
Venue
Nature Ecology & Evolution
Published
2017-06-12
Volume
1
Issue
7
ISSN
2397-334X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2626221200
Cited by
481
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 9
FWCI
33.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Universitat de Girona Digital Repository (Universitat de Girona) (acceptedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
  • Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (TD1209)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SE 1891/2–1, KL 1866/9-1, RVO 67985939, FZT118)
  • Volkswagen Foundation
  • Grantová Agentura České Republiky (GB14-36079G, RVO 67,985,939, 67985939)
  • Austrian Science Fund (I2096‐B16, I 2086)
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (CGL2015‐69311‐REDT, CGL2015, CGL2013‐43822‐R)
  • Akademie Věd České Republiky (RVO [67985939], 67985939, 14‐36079G)
  • Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BPD/84422/2012)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
invasive species, biological invasions, taxonomic groups, hot spots, GDP per capita, human population density, area, spatial congruence, amphibians, ants, birds, freshwater fish, mammals, vascular plants, reptiles, spiders, human-mediated transport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review