The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Synthetic microbiota reveal priority effects and keystone strains in the Arabidopsis phyllosphere
Open accessAbstract
Multicellular organisms, including plants, are colonized by microorganisms, some of which are beneficial to growth and health. The assembly rules for establishing plant microbiota are not well understood, and neither is the extent to which their members interact. We conducted drop-out and late introduction experiments by inoculating Arabidopsis thaliana with synthetic communities from a resource of 62 native bacterial strains to test how arrival order shapes community structure. As a read-out we tracked the relative abundance of all strains in the phyllosphere of individual plants. Our results showed that community assembly is historically contingent and subject to priority effects. Missing strains could, to various degrees, invade an already established microbiota, which was itself resistant and remained largely unaffected by latecomers. Additionally, our results indicate that individual strains of Proteobacteria (Sphingomonas, Rhizobium) and Actinobacteria (Microbacterium, Rhodococcus) have the greatest potential to affect community structure as keystone species. Conducting a series of removal experiments using synthetic leaf-inhabiting bacterial communities, the authors identify several keystone strains and show that priority effects drive phyllosphere community assembly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106
Guindon, S., Dufayard, J.-F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W., & Gascuel, O. (2010) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syq010 · Cited by 18,376
Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome
Faust, K., Sathirapongsasuti, J. F., Izard, J., Segata, N., Gevers, D., Raes, J., & Huttenhower, C. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002606 · Cited by 1,527
A Core Human Microbiome as Viewed through 16S rRNA Sequence Clusters
Huse, S. M., Ye, Y., Zhou, Y., & Fodor, A. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034242 · Cited by 572
Community Structure Follows Simple Assembly Rules in Microbial Microcosms
Friedman, J., Higgins, L. M., & Gore, J. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0109 · Cited by 557
Human genetic variation and the gut microbiome in disease
Hall, A. B., Tolonen, A. C., & Xavier, R. J. (2017) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.63 · Cited by 517
Martínez, I., Maldonado-Gomez, M. X., Gomes-Neto, J. C., Kittana, H., Ding, H., Schmaltz, R., Joglekar, P., Cardona, R. J., Marsteller, N. L., Kembel, S. W., et al. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.36521 · Cited by 199
Cited by
A single bacterial genus maintains root growth in a complex microbiome
Finkel, O. M., Salas-González, I., Castrillo, G., Conway, J. M., Law, T. F., Teixeira, P. J. P. L., Wilson, E. D., Fitzpatrick, C. R., Jones, C. D., & Dangl, J. L. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2778-7 · Cited by 517
The plant endosphere world – bacterial life within plants
Compant, S., Cambon, M. C., Vacher, C., Mitter, B., Samad, A., & Sessitsch, A. (2021) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.15240 · Cited by 401
The root microbiome: Community assembly and its contributions to plant fitness
Bai, B., Liu, W., Qiu, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., & Bai, Y. (2022) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.13226 · Cited by 389
Applying the core microbiome to understand host–microbe systems
Risely, A. (2020) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13229 · Cited by 363
Enabling sustainable agriculture through understanding and enhancement of microbiomes
Trivedi, P., Mattupalli, C., Eversole, K., & Leach, J. E. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17319 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlström, C. I., Field, C. M., Bortfeld-Miller, M., Müller, B., Sunagawa, S., & Vorholt, J. A.
- Venue
- Nature Ecology & Evolution
- Published
- 2019-09-26
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1445-1454
- ISSN
- 2397-334X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2975022102
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 24.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthetic microbiota reveal priority effects and keystone strains in the Arabidopsis phyllosphere. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41559-019-0994-z
- The paper
- Carlström, C. I., Field, C. M., Bortfeld-Miller, M., Müller, B., Sunagawa, S., & Vorholt, J. A. (2019). Synthetic microbiota reveal priority effects and keystone strains in the Arabidopsis phyllosphere. Nature Ecology & Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0994-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
