The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex-dependent dominance maintains migration supergene in rainbow trout
Open accessAbstract
Males and females often differ in their fitness optima for shared traits that have a shared genetic basis, leading to sexual conflict. Morphologically differentiated sex chromosomes can resolve this conflict and protect sexually antagonistic variation, but they accumulate deleterious mutations. However, how sexual conflict is resolved in species that lack differentiated sex chromosomes is largely unknown. Here we present a chromosome-anchored genome assembly for rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) and characterize a 55-Mb double-inversion supergene that mediates sex-specific migratory tendency through sex-dependent dominance reversal, an alternative mechanism for resolving sexual conflict. The double inversion contains key photosensory, circadian rhythm, adiposity and sex-related genes and displays a latitudinal frequency cline, indicating environmentally dependent selection. Our results show sex-dependent dominance reversal across a large autosomal supergene, a mechanism for sexual conflict resolution capable of protecting sexually antagonistic variation while avoiding the homozygous lethality and deleterious mutations associated with typical heteromorphic sex chromosomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools
Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., Durbin, R., & 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · Cited by 62,041
The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
(1987) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 · Cited by 59,715
Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G., & Jarvis, A. (2005) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.1276 · Cited by 19,825
BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees
Drummond, A. J., & Rambaut, A. (2007) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-214 · Cited by 12,919
Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics
Krzywinski, M., Schein, J., Birol, İ., Connors, J., Gascoyne, R., Horsman, D., Jones, S. J., & Marra, M. A. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.092759.109 · Cited by 10,964
Selection of Conserved Blocks from Multiple Alignments for Their Use in Phylogenetic Analysis
Castresana, J. (2000) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334 · Cited by 10,508
Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification
Bray, N. L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P., & Pachter, L. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3519 · Cited by 9,723
adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers
Jombart, T. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129 · Cited by 8,107
Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly con*gs with BWA-MEM
Li, H. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.963153.v1 · Cited by 4,932
Emms, D. M., & Kelly, S. (2015) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0721-2 · Cited by 3,408
Cited by
The crucial role of genome-wide genetic variation in conservation
Kardos, M., Armstrong, E. E., Fitzpatrick, S. W., Hauser, S., Hedrick, P. W., Miller, J. M., Tallmon, D. A., & Funk, W. C. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2104642118 · Cited by 607
Conservation and the Genomics of Populations
Allendorf, F. W., Funk, W. C., Aitken, S. N., Byrne, M., Luikart, G., & Antunes, A. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856566.001.0001 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearse, D. E., Barson, N. J., Nome, T., Gao, G., Campbell, M. A., Abadía-Cardoso, A., Anderson, E. C., Rundio, D. E., Williams, T. H., Naish, K. A., Moen, T., Liu, S., Kent, M., Moser, M., Minkley, D. R., Rondeau, E. B., Brieuc, M. S. O., Sandve, S. R., Miller, M. R., Cedillo, L., Baruch, K., Hernandez, A. G., Ben-Zvi, G., Shem-Tov, D., Barad, O., Kuzishchin, K., Garza, J. C., Lindley, S. T., Koop, B. F., Thorgaard, G. H., Palti, Y., & Lien, S.
- Venue
- Nature Ecology & Evolution
- Published
- 2019-11-25
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1731-1742
- ISSN
- 2397-334X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2990366509
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 99
- FWCI
- 24.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex-dependent dominance maintains migration supergene in rainbow trout. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41559-019-1044-6
- The paper
- Pearse, D. E., Barson, N. J., Nome, T., Gao, G., Campbell, M. A., Abadía-Cardoso, A., Anderson, E. C., Rundio, D. E., Williams, T. H., Naish, K. A., Moen, T., Liu, S., Kent, M., Moser, M., Minkley, D. R., Rondeau, E. B., Brieuc, M. S. O., Sandve, S. R., Miller, M. R., . . . Lien, S. (2019). Sex-dependent dominance maintains migration supergene in rainbow trout. Nature Ecology & Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-1044-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
