The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AI language tools risk scientific diversity and innovation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“all LLM-generated introductions on a certain topic might sound the same and would contain the same set of ideas and references, thereby missing out on innovations (45) and exacerbating citation injustice (46).”
From Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabulary (2025) · cites this paper as [45]
Citations
Cites
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641
Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers
Hong, L., & Page, S. E. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0403723101 · Cited by 2,103
Divide and conquer: intermediate levels of population fragmentation maximize cultural accumulation
Derex, M., Perreault, C., & Boyd, R. T. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0062 · Cited by 123
Applications of Evolutionary Culture Theory
Durham, W. H. (1992) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.001555 · Cited by 100
The network science of collective intelligence
Centola, D. M. (2022) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2022.08.009 · Cited by 92
AI tools can improve equity in science
Berdejo-Espinola, V., & Amano, T. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg9714 · Cited by 83
Youngblood, M., Baraghith, K., & Savage, P. E. (2021) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.06.002 · Cited by 27
Migration, Cultural Diversity and Innovation: A European PerspectivePreprint
Bosetti, V., Cattaneo, C., & Verdolini, E. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2162836 · Cited by 21
Innovation-facilitating networks create inequality
Moser, C. J., & Smaldino, P. E. (2023) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2023.2281 · Cited by 8
Innovation-Facilitating Networks Create InequalityPreprint
Moser, C. J., & Smaldino, P. E. (2023) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/n3hc6 · Cited by 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research
Messeri, L., & Crockett, M. J. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0 · Cited by 707
Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabulary
Kobak, D., González-Márquez, R., Horvát, E.-Á., & Lause, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.07016 · Cited by 214
Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabulary
Kobak, D., González-Márquez, R., Horvát, E.-Á., & Lause, J. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adt3813 · Cited by 213
“For instance, all LLM-generated introductions on a certain topic might sound the same and would contain the same set of ideas and references, thereby missing out on innovations (Nakadai et al., 2023) and exacerbating citation injustice (Dworkin et al., 2020).”
Diversity and Standards in Writing for Publication in the Age of AI—Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Kuteeva, M., & Andersson, M. (2024) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amae025 · Cited by 106
Science communication with generative AI
Alvarez, A., Caliskan, A., Crockett, M. J., Ho, S. S., Messeri, L. R., & West, J. D. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-01846-3 · Cited by 65
Large language models are proficient in solving and creating emotional intelligence tests
Schlegel, K., Sommer, N. R., & Mortillaro, M. (2025) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-025-00258-x · Cited by 46
Embrace responsible ChatGPT usage to overcome language barriers in academic writing
Kayaalp, M. E., Ollivier, M. P., Winkler, P. W., Dahmen, J., Musahl, V., Hirschmann, M. T., & Karlsson, J. (2023) · Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy · doi:10.1002/ksa.12014 · Cited by 49
Scientific publishing has a language problem
(2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01679-6 · Cited by 36
Language barriers in conservation: consequences and solutions
Amano, T., & Berdejo‐Espinola, V. (2024) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2024.11.003 · Cited by 28
Zhou, Y., Liu, Q., Huang, J., & Li, G. (2026) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103087 · Cited by 24
Using large language models for narrative analysis: a novel application of generative AI
Jenner, S., Raidos, D., Anderson, E., Fleetwood, S., Ainsworth, B., Fox, K. J., Kreppner, J., & Barker, M. E. (2025) · Methods in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.metip.2025.100183 · Cited by 32
Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05867-9 · Cited by 19
Maier, S., Schneider, M., & Feuerriegel, S. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791185 · Cited by 26
Farina, M., & Lavazza, A. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780198945215.003.0140 · Cited by 5
de Rooij, A., & Biskjær, M. M. (2026) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2026.2726451 · Cited by 3
Integrating AI into Design Ideation: Assessing ChatGPT’s Role in Human-Centered Design EducationPreprint
Papachristos, E., İnal, Y., Vicient, C., Johansen, E. A., & Hermansen, M. (2024) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.171656320.09963657/v1 · Cited by 5
Hayashi, R., & Hamaji, T. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7644480/v1
The Generative Mind: Internalizing Noise in Brains and Machines
Ryu, J. (2026) · Journal of Sciences and Innovation for Sustainable Peace · doi:10.23184/jsisp.vol.4.no.1.06
Advancements in the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence for Imaging and Image Analysis
Niz, M. D., Kirchenbüechler, D., Dluhy, P., Piguel, N. H., & Arvanitis, C. (2026) · Microscopy and Microanalysis · doi:10.1093/mam/ozag051
Finding the Fingerprints of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Psychology Publications
Botes, E., Teuber, Z., Vitali, N., Dewaele, J., & Colling, J. (2026) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459261472842 · Cited by 5
The Artificial View from Somewhere: Or How AI Could Undermine Scientific Objectivity
Nelson, E., & Vlaad, S. (2026) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-026-01214-1
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakadai, R., Nakawake, Y., & Shibasaki, S.
- Affiliations
- National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nakadai, Ryosuke
- Nakawake, Yo
- Shibasaki, Shota
- Venue
- Nature Human Behaviour
- Published
- 2023-06-22
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1804-1805
- ISSN
- 2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4381612567
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Keywords
- large language models, scientific diversity, scientific innovation, research integrity, AI-generated research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
