Cited by 85Ethics and Social Impacts of AIAcademic Publishing and Open Accessscientometrics and bibliometrics research

AI tools can improve equity in science

Berdejo-Espinola, Violeta, Amano, Tatsuya·2023·Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.adg9714

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berdejo-Espinola, V., & Amano, T.
Affiliations
  • School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia and Centre for Biodiversity Conservation and Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Science
Published
2023-03-10
Volume
379
Issue
6636
Pages
991-991
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W4323812846
Cited by
83
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 19
FWCI
20.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Keywords
artificial intelligence, equity in science, diversity in science, AI tools, scholarly publishing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review