Cited by 59Ethics and Social Impacts of AITopic ModelingMisinformation and Its Impacts

To protect science, we must use LLMs as zero-shot translators

Mittelstadt, Brent, Wachter, Sandra, Russell, Chris·2023·Nature Human Behaviour

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-023-01744-0

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LLMs are infamous for making up references, providing inaccurate summaries, and making false claims that sound authoritative and convincing.

    “LLMs are infamous for making up references (10), providing inaccurate summaries (35, 36), and making false claims that sound authoritative and convincing (8, 11, 12, 37).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [7]7. Holtzman, A., Buys, J., Du, L., Forbes, M. & Choi, Y. The curious case of neural text degeneration. in Proceedings of ICLR 2020 (2020).
  2. [8]8. Drezner, D. W. The ideas industry . (Oxford University Press, 2017).
  3. [14]14. Liew, C. S. et al. Scientific Workflows: Moving Across Paradigms. ACM Comput. Surv. 49 , 66:166:39 (2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mittelstadt, B., Wachter, S., & Russell, C.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Mittelstadt, Brent
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2023-11-20
Volume
7
Issue
11
Pages
1830-1832
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388824189
Cited by
58
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
14.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (G-2021-16779)
  • Wellcome Trust (223765/Z/21/Z)
  • Department of Health and Social Care Luminate Group
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
large language models, factual accuracy, zero-shot translation, fact-checking, scientific integrity, misinformation, knowledge distillation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review