Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 463

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Surface distortion as a unifying concept and descriptor in oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysis

Open access
Chattot, Raphaël, Le Bacq, Olivier, Beermann, Vera, Kühl, Stefanie, Herranz, Juan, Henning, Sebastian, Kühn, Laura, Asset, Tristan, Guétaz, Laure, Renou, Gilles, Drnec, Jakub, Bordet, Pierre, Pasturel, Alain, Eychmüller, Alexander, Schmidt, Thomas J., Strasser, Peter, Dubau, Laetitia, Maillard, Frédéric·2018·Nature Materials

Abstract

Tuning the surface structure at the atomic level is of primary importance to simultaneously meet the electrocatalytic performance and stability criteria required for the development of low-temperature proton-exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). However, transposing the knowledge acquired on extended, model surfaces to practical nanomaterials remains highly challenging. Here, we propose ‘surface distortion’ as a novel structural descriptor, which is able to reconciliate and unify seemingly opposing notions and contradictory experimental observations in regards to the electrocatalytic oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) reactivity. Beyond its unifying character, we show that surface distortion is pivotal to rationalize the electrocatalytic properties of state-of-the-art of PtNi/C nanocatalysts with distinct atomic composition, size, shape and degree of surface defectiveness under a simulated PEMFC cathode environment. Our study brings fundamental and practical insights into the role of surface defects in electrocatalysis and highlights strategies to design more durable ORR nanocatalysts.Tuning surface structure is key for electrocatalytic performance and stability of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Surface distortion as a structural descriptor can help to clarify the role of surface defects and to design enhanced nanocatalysts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41563-018-0133-2

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 463

Metadata

Authors
Chattot, R., Le Bacq, O., Beermann, V., Kühl, S., Herranz, J., Henning, S., Kühn, L., Asset, T., Guétaz, L., Renou, G., Drnec, J., Bordet, P., Pasturel, A., Eychmüller, A., Schmidt, T. J., Strasser, P., Dubau, L., & Maillard, F.
Venue
Nature Materials
Published
2018-07-16
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
827-833
ISSN
  • 1476-1122 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4660
OpenAlex
W2870211584
Cited by
463
References
6
FWCI
11.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surface distortion as a unifying concept and descriptor in oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41563-018-0133-2
The paper
Chattot, R., Le Bacq, O., Beermann, V., Kühl, S., Herranz, J., Henning, S., Kühn, L., Asset, T., Guétaz, L., Renou, G., Drnec, J., Bordet, P., Pasturel, A., Eychmüller, A., Schmidt, T. J., Strasser, P., Dubau, L., & Maillard, F. (2018). Surface distortion as a unifying concept and descriptor in oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysis. Nature Materials. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-018-0133-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.