Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 833

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 infections

Open access
Kevadiya, Bhavesh D., Machhi, Jatin, Herskovitz, Jonathan, Oleynikov, Maxim D., Blomberg, Wilson R., Bajwa, Neha, Soni, Dhruvkumar, Das, Srijanee, Hasan, Mahmudul, Patel, Milankumar, Senan, Ahmed M., Gorantla, Santhi, McMillan, JoEllyn, Edagwa, Benson, Eisenberg, Robert, Gurumurthy, Channabasavaiah B., Reid, St Patrick M., Punyadeera, Chamindie, Chang, Linda, Gendelman, Howard E.·2021·Nature Materials

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread to nearly every corner of the globe, causing societal instability. The resultant coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) leads to fever, sore throat, cough, chest and muscle pain, dyspnoea, confusion, anosmia, ageusia and headache. These can progress to life-threatening respiratory insufficiency, also affecting the heart, kidney, liver and nervous systems. The diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is often confused with that of influenza and seasonal upper respiratory tract viral infections. Due to available treatment strategies and required containments, rapid diagnosis is mandated. This Review brings clarity to the rapidly growing body of available and in-development diagnostic tests, including nanomaterial-based tools. It serves as a resource guide for scientists, physicians, students and the public at large. This Review highlights the progress that has been made in the development of diagnostic tools for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the fight against COVID-19.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41563-020-00906-z

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 97 references

Cited by

See all 833

Metadata

Authors
Kevadiya, B. D., Machhi, J., Herskovitz, J., Oleynikov, M. D., Blomberg, W. R., Bajwa, N., Soni, D., Das, S., Hasan, M., Patel, M., Senan, A. M., Gorantla, S., McMillan, J., Edagwa, B., Eisenberg, R., Gurumurthy, C. B., Reid, S. P. M., Punyadeera, C., Chang, L., & Gendelman, H. E.
Venue
Nature Materials
Published
2021-02-15
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
593-605
ISSN
  • 1476-1122 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4660
OpenAlex
W3131296454
Cited by
833
References
97
FWCI
51.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41563-020-00906-z
The paper
Kevadiya, B. D., Machhi, J., Herskovitz, J., Oleynikov, M. D., Blomberg, W. R., Bajwa, N., Soni, D., Das, S., Hasan, M., Patel, M., Senan, A. M., Gorantla, S., McMillan, J., Edagwa, B., Eisenberg, R., Gurumurthy, C. B., Reid, S. P. M., Punyadeera, C., Chang, L., & Gendelman, H. E. (2021). Diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 infections. Nature Materials. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-00906-z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.