Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 707

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bulk fatigue induced by surface reconstruction in layered Ni-rich cathodes for Li-ion batteries

Open access
Xu, Chao, Märker, Katharina, Lee, Juhan, Mahadevegowda, Amoghavarsha, Reeves, Philip J., Day, Sarah J., Groh, Matthias F., Emge, Steffen P., Ducati, Caterina, Layla Mehdi, B., Tang, Chiu C., Grey, Clare P.·2021·Nature Materials

Abstract

Ni-rich layered cathode materials are among the most promising candidates for high-energy-density Li-ion batteries, yet their degradation mechanisms are still poorly understood. We report a structure-driven degradation mechanism for NMC811 (LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 ), in which a proportion of the material exhibits a lowered accessible state of charge at the end of charging after repetitive cycling and becomes fatigued. Operando synchrotron long-duration X-ray diffraction enabled by a laser-thinned coin cell shows the emergence and growth in the concentration of this fatigued phase with cycle number. This degradation is structure driven and is not solely due to kinetic limitations or intergranular cracking: no bulk phase transformations, no increase in Li/Ni antisite mixing and no notable changes in the local structure or Li-ion mobility of the bulk are seen in aged NMCs. Instead, we propose that this degradation stems from the high interfacial lattice strain between the reconstructed surface and the bulk layered structure that develops when the latter is at states of charge above a distinct threshold of approximately 75%. This mechanism is expected to be universal in Ni-rich layered cathodes. Our findings provide fundamental insights into strategies to help mitigate this degradation process. Ni-rich layered cathode materials are promising for high-energy-density Li-ion batteries, but their degradation mechanisms are still poorly understood. A structure-driven mechanism with a lowered accessible state of charge after repetitive cycling is proposed for a typical NMC811 cathode.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41563-020-0767-8

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 707

Metadata

Authors
Xu, C., Märker, K., Lee, J., Mahadevegowda, A., Reeves, P. J., Day, S. J., Groh, M. F., Emge, S. P., Ducati, C., Layla Mehdi, B., Tang, C. C., & Grey, C. P.
Venue
Nature Materials
Published
2020-08-24
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
84-92
ISSN
  • 1476-1122 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4660
OpenAlex
W3081021855
Cited by
707
References
29
FWCI
27.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bulk fatigue induced by surface reconstruction in layered Ni-rich cathodes for Li-ion batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41563-020-0767-8
The paper
Xu, C., Märker, K., Lee, J., Mahadevegowda, A., Reeves, P. J., Day, S. J., Groh, M. F., Emge, S. P., Ducati, C., Layla Mehdi, B., Tang, C. C., & Grey, C. P. (2021). Bulk fatigue induced by surface reconstruction in layered Ni-rich cathodes for Li-ion batteries. Nature Materials. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0767-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.