Cited by 106Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsCellular Mechanics and InteractionsCancer Treatment and Pharmacology

Kinesin expands and stabilizes the GDP-microtubule lattice

Open access
Peet, Daniel R., Burroughs, Nigel J., Cross, Robert A.·2018·Nature Nanotechnology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Kinesin-1 is a nanoscale molecular motor that walks towards the fast-growing (plus) ends of microtubules, hauling molecular cargo to specific reaction sites in cells. Kinesin-driven transport is central to the self-organization of eukaryotic cells and shows great promise as a tool for nano-engineering 1 . Recent work hints that kinesin may also play a role in modulating the stability of its microtubule track, both in vitro 2,3 and in vivo 4 , but the results are conflicting 5-7 and the mechanisms are unclear. Here, we report a new dimension to the kinesin-microtubule interaction, whereby strong-binding state (adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-bound and apo) kinesin-1 motor domains inhibit the shrinkage of guanosine diphosphate (GDP) microtubules by up to two orders of magnitude and expand their lattice spacing by ~1.6%. Our data reveal an unexpected mechanism by which the mechanochemical cycles of kinesin and tubulin interlock, and so allow motile kinesins to influence the structure, stability and mechanics of their microtubule track.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41565-018-0084-4

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various microtubule-binding proteins have higher affinities for expanded or compacted lattices in vitro and can induce lattice expansion or compaction, respectively.

    “various microtubule-binding proteins have higher affinities for expanded or compacted lattices in vitro and can also induce lattice expansion or compaction, respectively (Ferro et al., 2022; Guedes-Dias et al., 2019; Peet et al., 2018; Shima et al., 2018; Watanabe et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2017)”

    From StableMARK-decorated microtubules in cells have expanded lattices (2025) · cites this paper as Peet et al., 2018

  • In vitro, at high concentrations in the no-nucleotide state, the kinesin-1 motor domain can extend microtubule lattice spacing, suggesting it prefers to bind to the expanded lattice conformation at lower concentrations.

    “Third, in vitro experiments have revealed that at high concentrations in the no-nucleotide state, the kinesin-1 motor domain can extend MT lattice spacing, suggesting that it prefers to bind to this expanded MT lattice conformation at lower concentrations (Peet et al., 2018; Shima et al., 2018).”
  • Kinesin binding expands the microtubule lattice, suggesting that exclusive binding may arise from competition for an expanded versus compacted lattice.

    “Apart from steric clashes between tau and kinesin9,41, kinesin binding expands the microtubule lattice4,6 suggesting that exclusive binding may arise from competition for an expanded versus compacted lattice.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. [1]Bachand GD Spoerke ED Stevens MJ Microtubule-based nanomaterials: Exploiting nature's dynamic biopolymers Biotechnol Bioeng 2015 112 1065 1073 25728349
  2. [2]Katsuki M Drummond DR Cross RA Ectopic A-lattice seams destabilize microtubules Nat Commun 2014 5 3094 24463734 PMC3921467
  3. [3]Lombillo VA Stewart RJ McIntosh JR Minus-end-directed motion of kinesin-coated microspheres driven by microtubule depolymerization Nature 1995 373 161 164 7816099
  4. [4]Marceiller J Drechou A Durand G Perez F Poüs C Kinesin is involved in protecting nascent microtubules from disassembly after recovery from nocodazole treatment Exp Cell Res 2005 304 483 492 15748893
  5. [5]Kowalski RJ Williams RC Unambiguous Classification of Microtubule-Ends In Vitro: Dynamic Properties of the Plus- and Minus-Ends Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 1993 26 282 290 8299144
  6. [6]Daire V Kinesin-1 regulates microtubule dynamics via a c-Jun N-terminal kinase-dependent mechanism J Biol Chem 2009 284 31992 32001 19759393 PMC2797271
  7. [7]Kimura Arimura Fukata TNY Watanabe H Iwamatsu A Kaibuchi K Tubulin and CRMP-2 complex is transported via Kinesin-1 J Neurochem 2005 93 1371 1382 15935053
  8. [8]Nakata T Hirokawa N Point mutation of adenosine triphosphate-binding motif generated rigor kinesin that selectively blocks anterograde lysosome membrane transport J Cell Biol 1995 131 1039 1053 7490281 PMC2200001
  9. [9]Cross RA The kinetic mechanism of kinesin Trends Biochem Sci 2004 29 301 309 15276184
  10. [10]VanDelinder V Adams PG Bachand GD Mechanical splitting of microtubules into protofilament bundles by surface-bound kinesin-1 Sci Rep 2016 6 39408 28000714 PMC5175155
  11. [11]Kabir AMR Biomolecular Motor Modulates Mechanical Property of Microtubule Biomacromolecules 2014 15 1797 1805 24697688
  12. [12]Krebs A Goldie KN Hoenger A Complex formation with kinesin motor domains affects the structure of microtubules J Mol Biol 2004 335 139 153 14659746
  13. [13]Morikawa M X-ray and Cryo-EM structures reveal mutual conformational changes of Kinesin and GTP-state microtubules upon binding EMBO J 2015 34 1270 1286 25777528 PMC4426485
  14. [14]Alushin GM High-Resolution Microtubule Structures Reveal the Structural Transitions in αβ-Tubulin upon GTP Hydrolysis Cell 2014 157 1117 1129 24855948 PMC4054694
  15. [15]Nakata T Niwa S Okada Y Perez F Hirokawa N Preferential binding of a kinesin-1 motor to GTP-tubulin-rich microtubules underlies polarized vesicle transport J Cell Biol 2011 194 245 255 21768290 PMC3144414
  16. [16]Zhang R Alushin GM Brown A Nogales E Mechanistic Origin of Microtubule Dynamic Instability and Its Modulation by EB Proteins Cell 2015 162 1 11 PMC4537847 26234155
  17. [17]Muto EE Sakai HH Kaseda KK Long-range cooperative binding of kinesin to a microtubule in the presence of ATP J Cell Biol 2005 168 691 696 15738263 PMC2171822
  18. [18]Arora K KIF14 binds tightly to microtubules and adopts a rigor-like conformation J Mol Biol 2014 426 2997 3015 24949858
  19. [19]Chen Y Hancock WO Kinesin-5 is a microtubule polymerase Nat Commun 2015 6 8160 26437877 PMC4600729
  20. [20]Hibbel A Kinesin Kip2 enhances microtubule growth in vitro through length-dependent feedback on polymerization and catastrophe eLife 2015 4 e10542 26576948 PMC4758950
  21. [22]Sirajuddin M Rice LM Vale RD Regulation of microtubule motors by tubulin isotypes and post-translational modifications Nat Cell Biol 2014 16 335 344 24633327 PMC4117587
  22. [23]Vale RD Coppin CM Malik F Kull FJ Milligan RA Tubulin GTP hydrolysis influences the structure, mechanical properties, and kinesin-driven transport of microtubules J Biol Chem 1994 269 23769 23775 7916345
  23. [25]Cross RA McAinsh A Prime movers: the mechanochemistry of mitotic kinesins Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2014 15 257 271 24651543
  24. [26]Hendricks AG Dynein Tethers and Stabilizes Dynamic Microtubule Plus Ends Curr Biol 2012 22 632 637 22445300 PMC3347920
  25. [27]Blehm BH Schroer TA Trybus KM Chemla YR Selvin PR In vivo optical trapping indicates kinesin's stall force is reduced by dynein during intracellular transport Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013 110 3381 3386 23404705 PMC3587256
  26. [28]Perur N Yahara M Kamei T Tamaoki N A non-nucleoside triphosphate for powering kinesin-microtubule motility with photo-tunable velocity ChemComm 2013 49 9935 9937 24037324

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peet, D. R., Burroughs, N. J., & Cross, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Cross, Robert A.
Venue
Nature Nanotechnology
Published
2018-03-12
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
386-391
ISSN
  • 1748-3387 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-3395
OpenAlex
W2791508075
Cited by
106
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Nanotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (103895/Z/14/Z)
  • University of Warwick
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/G530233/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Keywords
kinesin-1, microtubule lattice, microtubule stability, lattice spacing, mechanochemical cycle, tubulin, molecular motors, freight transport
MeSH terms
Adenylyl Imidodiphosphate, Animals, Guanosine Diphosphate, Microtubules, Swine, Kinesins, Amino Acid Substitution, Mutation, Missense

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review