Cited by 113Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum optics and atomic interactionsQuantum Information and Cryptography

Ultrafast energy exchange between two single Rydberg atoms on a nanosecond timescale

Open access
Chew, Y., Tomita, T., Mahesh, T. P., Sugawa, S., de Léséleuc, S., Ohmori, K.·2022·Nature Photonics

Abstract

Abstract Rydberg atoms, with their enormous electronic orbitals, exhibit dipole–dipole interactions reaching the gigahertz range at a distance of a micrometre, making them a prominent contender for realizing ultrafast quantum operations. However, such strong interactions between two single atoms have so far never been harnessed due to the stringent requirements on the fluctuation of the atom positions and the necessary excitation strength. Here we introduce novel techniques to explore this regime. First, we trap and cool atoms to the motional quantum ground state of holographic optical tweezers, which allows control of the inter-atomic distance down to 1.5 μm with a quantum-limited precision of 30 nm. We then use ultrashort laser pulses to excite a pair of these nearby atoms to a Rydberg state simultaneously, far beyond the Rydberg blockade regime, and perform Ramsey interferometry with attosecond precision. This allows us to induce and track an ultrafast interaction-driven energy exchange completed on nanosecond timescales—two orders of magnitude faster than in any other Rydberg experiments in the tweezers platform so far. This ultrafast coherent dynamics gives rise to a conditional phase, which is the key resource for a quantum gate, opening the path for quantum simulation and computation operating at the speed limit set by dipole–dipole interactions with this ultrafast Rydberg platform.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41566-022-01047-2

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chew, Y., Tomita, T., Mahesh, T. P., Sugawa, S., de Léséleuc, S., & Ohmori, K.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Natural Sciences (JP)
Corresponding author
Ohmori, K.
Venue
Nature Photonics
Published
2022-08-08
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
724-729
ISSN
  • 1749-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-4893
OpenAlex
W3215498831
Cited by
113
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 2
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Photonics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19K23431, 16H06289)
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (JPMXS0118069021)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
Rydberg atoms, dipole-dipole interaction, energy exchange, holographic optical tweezers, Ramsey interferometry, quantum gates, quantum simulation, quantum computing, Rydberg blockade, ultrashort laser pulses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review