Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Immunotherapeutic approaches for small-cell lung cancer

Open access
Iams, Wade T., Porter, Jason, Horn, Leora·2020·Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved in the first-line and third-line settings for patients with extensive-stage or relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), respectively. In the first-line setting, the addition of the anti-programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody atezolizumab to chemotherapy improves overall survival (OS). In patients with relapsed disease, data from nonrandomized trials have revealed promising responses, although a significant improvement in OS over that obtained with conventional chemotherapy was not achieved in a randomized trial in this setting. Substantial research interest exists in identifying predictive biomarkers that could guide the use of ICIs in patients with SCLC. PD-L1 expression is typically low or absent in SCLC, which has precluded its use as a predictive biomarker. Tumour mutational burden might have some predictive value, although blood-based measures of tumour mutational burden did not have predictive value in patients receiving atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in the first-line setting. After three decades, ICIs have finally enabled an improvement in OS for patients with SCLC; however, a substantial amount of research remains to be done, including identifying the optimal therapeutic strategy and predictive biomarkers. In this Review, we describe the available data on clinical efficacy, the emerging evidence regarding biomarkers and ongoing clinical trials using ICIs and other immunotherapies in patients with SCLC. Patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have historically received chemotherapy, typically with poor survival outcomes. In the past few years, the combination of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy has provided a more effective alternative to chemotherapy alone. Nonetheless, durations of survival are often short, and no robust biomarkers of response are available. In this Review, the authors provide a summary of the efficacy and safety of ICIs in patients with SCLC, and also highlight potential novel immunotherapeutic approaches that are currently in the early stages of investigation. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved as first-line and third-line therapies for patients with advanced-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). In the first-line setting, the anti-programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 ICI atezolizumab plus chemotherapy has been shown to improve overall survival, relative to chemotherapy alone. In the relapsed setting, nonrandomized data reveal promising responses to several ICIs that have not been corroborated in randomized trials. No broadly accepted biomarkers that predict benefit from ICI have been identified to date. Many ongoing trials are evaluating the performance of immune-based treatment strategies in patients with SCLC; these will hopefully enable the optimization of immune-based treatment strategies in this patient population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41571-019-0316-z

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Iams, W. T., Porter, J., & Horn, L.
Venue
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Published
2020-02-13
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
300-312
ISSN
  • 1759-4774 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4782
OpenAlex
W3006467062
Cited by
311
References
9
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunotherapeutic approaches for small-cell lung cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41571-019-0316-z
The paper
Iams, W. T., Porter, J., & Horn, L. (2020). Immunotherapeutic approaches for small-cell lung cancer. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-019-0316-z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.