The DOI matches its Crossref record; 179 of the 179 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personalized early detection and prevention of breast cancer: ENVISION consensus statement
Open accessAbstract
The European Collaborative on Personalized Early Detection and Prevention of Breast Cancer (ENVISION) brings together several international research consortia working on different aspects of the personalized early detection and prevention of breast cancer. In a consensus conference held in 2019, the members of this network identified research areas requiring development to enable evidence-based personalized interventions that might improve the benefits and reduce the harms of existing breast cancer screening and prevention programmes. The priority areas identified were: 1) breast cancer subtype-specific risk assessment tools applicable to women of all ancestries; 2) intermediate surrogate markers of response to preventive measures; 3) novel non-surgical preventive measures to reduce the incidence of breast cancer of poor prognosis; and 4) hybrid effectiveness–implementation research combined with modelling studies to evaluate the long-term population outcomes of risk-based early detection strategies. The implementation of such programmes would require health-care systems to be open to learning and adapting, the engagement of a diverse range of stakeholders and tailoring to societal norms and values, while also addressing the ethical and legal issues. In this Consensus Statement, we discuss the current state of breast cancer risk prediction, risk-stratified prevention and early detection strategies, and their implementation. Throughout, we highlight priorities for advancing each of these areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R. L., Torre, L. A., & Jemal, A. (2018) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21492 · Cited by 84,109
Principles of Biomedical Ethics
(2012) · Thieves of Virtue · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9079.003.0009 · Cited by 13,453
Sørlie, T., Perou, C. M., Tibshirani, R., Aas, T., Geisler, S., Johnsen, H., Hastie, T., Eisen, M. B., van de Rijn, M., Jeffrey, S. S., et al. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.191367098 · Cited by 10,938
The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups
METABRIC Group, Curtis, C., Shah, S. P., Chin, S.-F., Turashvili, G., Rueda, O. M., Dunning, M. J., Speed, D., Lynch, A. G., Samarajiwa, S., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10983 · Cited by 6,097
Fisher, B., Costantino, J. P., Wickerham, D. L., Redmond, C. K., Kavanah, M., Cronin, W. M., Vogel, V., Robidoux, A., Dimitrov, N., Atkins, J., et al. (1998) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/90.18.1371 · Cited by 5,485
Renehan, A. G., Tyson, M., Egger, M., Heller, R. F., & Zwahlen, M. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60269-x · Cited by 5,219
Breast Cancer Treatment: A Review
Waks, A. G., & Winer, E. P. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.19323 · Cited by 4,804
Sekhon, M., Cartwright, M., & Francis, J. J. (2017) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8 · Cited by 3,938
Gail, M. H., Brinton, L. A., Byar, D. P., Corle, D. K., Green, S. B., Schairer, C., & Mulvihill, J. J. (1989) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/81.24.1879 · Cited by 3,334
Liquid biopsies come of age: Towards implementation of circulating tumour DNA
Wan, J. C. M., Massie, C., Garcia-Corbacho, J., Mouliere, F., Brenton, J. D., Caldas, C., Pacey, S., Baird, R., & Rosenfeld, N. (2017) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2017.7 · Cited by 2,809
Cited by
Arasu, V. A., Habel, L. A., Achacoso, N. S., Buist, D. S. M., Cord, J. B., Esserman, L. J., Hylton, N. M., Glymour, M. M., Kornak, J., Kushi, L. H., et al. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.222733 · Cited by 98
Self-citationOverview of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) guidelines across Europe
Marmolejo, D. H., Wong, M. Y. Z., Bajalica-Lagercrantz, S., Tischkowitz, M., Balmaña, J., Patócs, A. B., Chappuis, P., Colas, C., Genuardi, M., Haanpää, M., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2021.104350 · Cited by 67
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pashayan, N., Antoniou, A. C., Ivanus, U., Esserman, L. J., Easton, D. F., French, D., Sroczynski, G., Hall, P., Cuzick, J., Evans, D. G., Simard, J., Garcia-Closas, M., Schmutzler, R., Wegwarth, O., Pharoah, P., Moorthie, S., De Montgolfier, S., Baron, C., Herceg, Z., Turnbull, C., Balleyguier, C., Rossi, P. G., Wesseling, J., Ritchie, D., Tischkowitz, M., Broeders, M., Reisel, D., Metspalu, A., Callender, T., de Koning, H., Devilee, P., Delaloge, S., Schmidt, M. K., & Widschwendter, M.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2020-06-18
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 687-705
- ISSN
- 1759-4774 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-4782
- OpenAlex
- W3027335902
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 179
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Personalized early detection and prevention of breast cancer: ENVISION consensus statement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41571-020-0388-9
- The paper
- Pashayan, N., Antoniou, A. C., Ivanus, U., Esserman, L. J., Easton, D. F., French, D., Sroczynski, G., Hall, P., Cuzick, J., Evans, D. G., Simard, J., Garcia-Closas, M., Schmutzler, R., Wegwarth, O., Pharoah, P., Moorthie, S., De Montgolfier, S., Baron, C., Herceg, Z., . . . Widschwendter, M. (2020). Personalized early detection and prevention of breast cancer: ENVISION consensus statement. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-020-0388-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
