Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 731

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 206 of the 206 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical relevance of tumour-associated macrophages

Open access
Pittet, Mikael J., Michielin, Olivier, Migliorini, Denis·2022·Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

Abstract

In the past decade, substantial advances have been made in understanding the biology of tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs), and their clinical relevance is emerging. A particular aspect that is becoming increasingly clear is that the interaction of TAMs with cancer cells and stromal cells in the tumour microenvironment enables and sustains most of the hallmarks of cancer. Therefore, manipulation of TAMs could enable improved disease control in a substantial fraction of patients across a large number of cancer types. In this Review, we examine the diversity of TAMs in various cancer indications and how this heterogeneity is being revisited with the advent of single-cell technologies, and then explore the current knowledge on the functional roles of different TAM states and the prognostic and predictive value of TAM-related signatures. We also review agents targeting TAMs that are currently being or will soon be tested in clinical trials, and how manipulations of TAMs can improve existing anticancer treatments. Finally, we discuss how TAM-targeting approaches could be further integrated into routine clinical practice, considering a precision oncology approach and viewing TAMs as a dynamic population that can evolve under treatment pressure. The interaction of tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) with cancer and stromal cells in the tumour microenvironment enables and sustains most of the hallmarks of cancer. The authors of this Review examine the diversity of TAMs in various cancer indications, which is being revisited with the advent of single-cell technologies, and discuss the functional roles of different TAM states, the prognostic and predictive value of TAM-related signatures as well as approaches involving TAMs that are currently being or will soon be tested in clinical trials. Tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) are phenotypically and functionally diverse; therefore, some can promote tumour progression whereas others can exhibit antitumour activity. Some TAM states have prognostic value because their abundance is associated with distinct clinical outcomes, as is the case for TAM states in patients with melanoma and lung, colorectal, ovarian, pancreatic, stomach and kidney cancers. Some TAM states are associated with response to treatment, or lack thereof, as demonstrated in seminal studies involving patients with breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma and melanoma. Not all tumour-promoting TAMs have M2-like phenotypes, thus highlighting the importance of defining TAM states beyond the M1/M2 dichotomy. The diversity of TAMs suggests different possibilities for exploiting particular subsets for therapeutic purposes; as a result, an arsenal of macrophage-targeted agents are currently being tested in the clinic. With the integration of single-cell RNA sequencing and other omics in therapeutic decision-making processes, the inclusion of TAM data in precision oncology molecular tumour boards could become routine practice. Tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) are phenotypically and functionally diverse; therefore, some can promote tumour progression whereas others can exhibit antitumour activity. Some TAM states have prognostic value because their abundance is associated with distinct clinical outcomes, as is the case for TAM states in patients with melanoma and lung, colorectal, ovarian, pancreatic, stomach and kidney cancers. Some TAM states are associated with response to treatment, or lack thereof, as demonstrated in seminal studies involving patients with breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma and melanoma. Not all tumour-promoting TAMs have M2-like phenotypes, thus highlighting the importance of defining TAM states beyond the M1/M2 dichotomy. The diversity of TAMs suggests different possibilities for exploiting particular subsets for therapeutic purposes; as a result, an arsenal of macrophage-targeted agents are currently being tested in the clinic. With the integration of single-cell RNA sequencing and other omics in therapeutic decision-making processes, the inclusion of TAM data in precision oncology molecular tumour boards could become routine practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41571-022-00620-6

Cites

206 of 206 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 206 references

Cited by

See all 731

Metadata

Authors
Pittet, M. J., Michielin, O., & Migliorini, D.
Venue
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Published
2022-03-30
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
402-421
ISSN
  • 1759-4774 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4782
OpenAlex
W4221085385
Cited by
731
References
206
FWCI
14.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical relevance of tumour-associated macrophages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41571-022-00620-6
The paper
Pittet, M. J., Michielin, O., & Migliorini, D. (2022). Clinical relevance of tumour-associated macrophages. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-022-00620-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.