Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chromosome instability syndromes

Open access
Taylor, A. Malcolm R., Rothblum-Oviatt, Cynthia, Ellis, Nathan A., Hickson, Ian D., Meyer, Stefan, Crawford, Thomas O., Smogorzewska, Agata, Pietrucha, Barbara, Weemaes, Corry, Stewart, Grant S.·2019·Nature Reviews Disease Primers

Abstract

Fanconi anaemia (FA), ataxia telangiectasia (A-T), Nijmegen breakage syndrome (NBS) and Bloom syndrome (BS) are clinically distinct, chromosome instability (or breakage) disorders. Each disorder has its own pattern of chromosomal damage, with cells from these patients being hypersensitive to particular genotoxic drugs, indicating that the underlying defect in each case is likely to be different. In addition, each syndrome shows a predisposition to cancer. Study of the molecular and genetic basis of these disorders has revealed mechanisms of recognition and repair of DNA double-strand breaks, DNA interstrand crosslinks and DNA damage during DNA replication. Specialist clinics for each disorder have provided the concentration of expertise needed to tackle their characteristic clinical problems and improve outcomes. Although some treatments of the consequences of a disorder may be possible, for example, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in FA and NBS, future early intervention to prevent complications of disease will depend on a greater understanding of the roles of the affected DNA repair pathways in development. An important realization has been the predisposition to cancer in carriers of some of these gene mutations.Fanconi anaemia, ataxia telangiectasia, Nijmegen breakage syndrome and Bloom syndrome are rare, clinically distinct, chromosome instability syndromes. This Primer describes the understanding of the genetic and molecular basis of these disorders, including the relationship of the defects to the predisposition to cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41572-019-0113-0

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 222

Metadata

Authors
Taylor, A. M. R., Rothblum-Oviatt, C., Ellis, N. A., Hickson, I. D., Meyer, S., Crawford, T. O., Smogorzewska, A., Pietrucha, B., Weemaes, C., & Stewart, G. S.
Venue
Nature Reviews Disease Primers
Published
2019-09-19
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
64-64
ISSN
2056-676X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2974568482
Cited by
222
References
23
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chromosome instability syndromes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41572-019-0113-0
The paper
Taylor, A. M. R., Rothblum-Oviatt, C., Ellis, N. A., Hickson, I. D., Meyer, S., Crawford, T. O., Smogorzewska, A., Pietrucha, B., Weemaes, C., & Stewart, G. S. (2019). Chromosome instability syndromes. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-019-0113-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.