Cited by 471Machine Learning in Materials ScienceComputational Drug Discovery MethodsArtificial Intelligence Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 238 of the 239 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Emerging materials intelligence ecosystems propelled by machine learning

Open access
Batra, Rohit, Song, Le, Ramprasad, Rampi·2020·Nature Reviews Materials

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41578-020-00255-y

Cites

238 of 239 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 238 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Zhang, Y., Yoon, H. S., Koh, C. S. & Xie, D. in 2007 International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS) 1414–1418 (IEEE, 2007).
  2. Pennington, J., Socher, R. & Manning, C. D. in Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) 1532–1543 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2014).
  3. Savva, M. et al. in Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology 393–402 (ACM, 2011).
  4. Ray Choudhury, S. & Giles, C. L. in Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web 667–672 (ACM, 2015).
  5. Seo, M., Hajishirzi, H., Farhadi, A., Etzioni, O. & Malcolm, C. in Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 1466–1476 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2015).
  6. Sachan, M., Dubey, K. & Xing, E. in Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 773–784 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017).
  7. Santos, I., Nieves, J., Penya, Y. K. & Bringas, P. G. in 2009 ICCAS-SICE 4536–4541 (IEEE, 2009).
  8. Dai, H., Li, C., Coley, C., Dai, B. & Song, L. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (eds Wallach, H. et al.) 8870–8880 (Curran Associates, 2019).
  9. You, J., Liu, B., Ying, Z., Pande, V. & Leskovec, J. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (eds Bengio, S. et al) 6410–6421 (Curran Associates, 2018).
  10. Goodfellow, I. et al. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27 (eds Ghahramani, Z. et al.) 2672–2680 (Curran Associates, 2014).
  11. Laanait, N., Yin, J. & Borisevich, A. in Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) 2019 Workshop Deep Inverse (OpenReview, 2019).
  12. Corey, E. J. The Logic of Chemical Synthesis (Wiley, 1991).
  13. Rossi, F., Van Beek, P. & Walsh, T. Handbook of Constraint Programming (Elsevier, 2006).
  14. Zaheer, M. et al. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 3391–3401 (Cornell University, 2017).
  15. Schütt, K. et al. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 991–1001 (Cornell University, 2017).
  16. Finn, C., Abbeel, P. & Levine, S. in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 70 1126–1135 (JMLR.org, 2017).
  17. Otsuka, S., Kuwajima, I., Hosoya, J., Xu, Y. & Yamazaki, M. in 2011 International Conference on Emerging Intelligent Data and Web Technologies 22–29 (IEEE, 2011).
  18. Ogata, T. & Yamazaki, M. in Harnessing The Materials Genome: Accelerated Materials Development via Computational and Experimental Tools, ECI Symposium Series (ECI Digital Archives, 2012).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Batra, R., Song, L., & Ramprasad, R.
Affiliations
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Ramprasad, Rampi
Venue
Nature Reviews Materials
Published
2020-11-09
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
655-678
ISSN
2058-8437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3100445615
Cited by
446
References
238
Citations by year
2026: 109 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Materials (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Toyota Research Institute
  • Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
machine learning, human-machine collaboration, materials discovery, materials development, materials informatics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review