The DOI matches its Crossref record; 284 of the 284 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA double-strand break repair-pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells
Open accessAbstract
The major pathways of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair are crucial for maintaining genomic stability. However, if deployed in an inappropriate cellular context, these same repair functions can mediate chromosome rearrangements that underlie various human diseases, ranging from developmental disorders to cancer. The two major mechanisms of DSB repair in mammalian cells are non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination. In this Review, we consider DSB repair-pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells as a series of ‘decision trees’, and explore how defective pathway choice can lead to genomic instability. Stalled, collapsed or broken DNA replication forks present a distinctive challenge to the DSB repair system. Emerging evidence suggests that the ‘rules’ governing repair-pathway choice at stalled replication forks differ from those at replication-independent DSBs. The choice between the major DNA double-strand break repair pathways is important for maintaining genomic stability. In mammals, selecting one pathway over another involves a complex series of binary ‘decisions’. Emerging evidence suggests that the ‘decision tree’ governing repair-pathway choice at stalled replication forks differs from that of replication-independent double-strand breaks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
RETRACTED ARTICLE: A mechanism for the suppression of homologous recombination in G1 cells
Orthwein, A., Noordermeer, S. M., Wilson, M. D., Landry, S., Enchev, R. I., Sherker, A., Munro, M., Pinder, J., Salsman, J., Dellaire, G., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16142 · Cited by 471
RetractedMitosis Inhibits DNA Double-Strand Break Repair to Guard Against Telomere Fusions
Orthwein, A., Fradet-Turcotte, A., Noordermeer, S. M., Canny, M. D., Brun, C. M., Strecker, J., Escribano-Diaz, C., & Durocher, D. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1248024 · Cited by 319
RetractedThe DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives
Ciccia, A., & Elledge, S. J. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019 · Cited by 4,368
PARP inhibitors: Synthetic lethality in the clinic
Lord, C. J., & Ashworth, A. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam7344 · Cited by 2,880
Sensing DNA Damage Through ATRIP Recognition of RPA-ssDNA Complexes
Zou, L., & Elledge, S. J. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1083430 · Cited by 2,693
Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences
Nik-Zainal, S., Davies, H., Staaf, J., Ramakrishna, M., Glodzik, D., Zou, X., Martincorena, I., Alexandrov, L. B., Martin, S., Wedge, D. C., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17676 · Cited by 2,218
Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Pâques, F., & Haber, J. E. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.2.349-404.1999 · Cited by 2,120
Causes and consequences of replication stress
Zeman, M. K., & Cimprich, K. A. (2014) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2897 · Cited by 2,079
ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: The Trinity at the Heart of the DNA Damage Response
Blackford, A. N., & Jackson, S. P. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.015 · Cited by 1,961
ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity
Cimprich, K. A., & Cortez, D. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2450 · Cited by 1,798
Cited by
Molecular mechanisms and cellular functions of cGAS–STING signalling
Hopfner, K.-P., & Hornung, V. (2020) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-0244-x · Cited by 2,052
Matthews, H. K., Bertoli, C., & de Bruin, R. A. M. (2022) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-021-00404-3 · Cited by 1,506
DNA Repair Pathway Choices in CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing
Xue, C., & Greene, E. C. (2021) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2021.02.008 · Cited by 431
Immunological impact of cell death signaling driven by radiation on the tumor microenvironment
Rodriguez-Ruiz, M. E., Vitale, I., Harrington, K. J., Melero, I., & Galluzzi, L. (2020) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-019-0561-4 · Cited by 385
Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks by the Nonhomologous End Joining Pathway
Stinson, B. M., & Loparo, J. J. (2021) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-080320-110356 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Scully, R., Panday, A., Elango, R., & Willis, N. A.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
- Published
- 2019-07-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 698-714
- ISSN
- 1471-0072 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0080
- OpenAlex
- W2955620588
- Cited by
- 1,457
- References
- 284
- FWCI
- 10.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA double-strand break repair-pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41580-019-0152-0
- The paper
- Scully, R., Panday, A., Elango, R., & Willis, N. A. (2019). DNA double-strand break repair-pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-019-0152-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.