Cited by 229DNA Repair MechanismsEffects of Radiation ExposureCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 173 of the 173 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks by the Nonhomologous End Joining Pathway

Open access
Stinson, Benjamin M., Loparo, Joseph J.·2021·Annual Review of Biochemistry

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks pose a serious threat to genome stability. In vertebrates, these breaks are predominantly repaired by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), which pairs DNA ends in a multiprotein synaptic complex to promote their direct ligation. NHEJ is a highly versatile pathway that uses an array of processing enzymes to modify damaged DNA ends and enable their ligation. The mechanisms of end synapsis and end processing have important implications for genome stability. Rapid and stable synapsis is necessary to limit chromosome translocations that result from the mispairing of DNA ends. Furthermore, end processing must be tightly regulated to minimize mutations at the break site. Here, we review our current mechanistic understanding of vertebrate NHEJ, with a particular focus on end synapsis and processing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-biochem-080320-110356

Cites

173 of 173 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1128/MCB.20.9.2996-3003.2000 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/emboj.2012.304 · DOI
  3. Lee JW, 2003, Cancer Res, 63, 22
  4. Pfeiffer P, 1994, Mol. Cell. Biol., 14, 888
  5. Roth DB, 1986, Mol. Cell. Biol., 6, 4295
  6. 10.1038/nature08926 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stinson, B. M., & Loparo, J. J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Loparo, Joseph J.
Venue
Annual Review of Biochemistry
Published
2021-06-20
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
137-164
ISSN
  • 0066-4154 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4509
OpenAlex
W3127347270
Cited by
223
References
173
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM115487)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
non-homologous end joining, DNA double-strand breaks, DNA end processing, genome stability, chromosomal translocation, DNA ligation
MeSH terms
Animals, Enzymes, Humans, Models, Biological, Genomic Instability, Multiprotein Complexes, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, DNA End-Joining Repair, V(D)J Recombination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review