Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 814

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cell–extracellular matrix mechanotransduction in 3D

Open access
Saraswathibhatla, Aashrith, Indana, Dhiraj, Chaudhuri, Ovijit·2023·Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Abstract

Mechanical cues from the extracellular matrix (ECM) regulate cell fate and behaviour through cell–ECM mechanotransduction. Studies of cell–ECM mechanotransduction have largely focused on cells cultured in 2D, and only recently have we begun to unravel how these processes occur in 3D — a context native to many cells in vivo. Mechanical properties of extracellular matrices (ECMs) regulate essential cell behaviours, including differentiation, migration and proliferation, through mechanotransduction. Studies of cell–ECM mechanotransduction have largely focused on cells cultured in 2D, on top of elastic substrates with a range of stiffnesses. However, cells often interact with ECMs in vivo in a 3D context, and cell–ECM interactions and mechanisms of mechanotransduction in 3D can differ from those in 2D. The ECM exhibits various structural features as well as complex mechanical properties. In 3D, mechanical confinement by the surrounding ECM restricts changes in cell volume and cell shape but allows cells to generate force on the matrix by extending protrusions and regulating cell volume as well as through actomyosin-based contractility. Furthermore, cell–matrix interactions are dynamic owing to matrix remodelling. Accordingly, ECM stiffness, viscoelasticity and degradability often play a critical role in regulating cell behaviours in 3D. Mechanisms of 3D mechanotransduction include traditional integrin-mediated pathways that sense mechanical properties and more recently described mechanosensitive ion channel-mediated pathways that sense 3D confinement, with both converging on the nucleus for downstream control of transcription and phenotype. Mechanotransduction is involved in tissues from development to cancer and is being increasingly harnessed towards mechanotherapy. Here we discuss recent progress in our understanding of cell–ECM mechanotransduction in 3D.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41580-023-00583-1

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 814

Metadata

Authors
Saraswathibhatla, A., Indana, D., & Chaudhuri, O.
Venue
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Published
2023-02-27
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
495-516
ISSN
  • 1471-0072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0080
OpenAlex
W4322493855
Cited by
814
References
34
FWCI
29.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell–extracellular matrix mechanotransduction in 3D. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41580-023-00583-1
The paper
Saraswathibhatla, A., Indana, D., & Chaudhuri, O. (2023). Cell–extracellular matrix mechanotransduction in 3D. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-023-00583-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.