The DOI matches its Crossref record; 158 of the 158 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Novel electrode technologies for neural recordings
Open accessAbstract
Neural recording electrode technologies have contributed considerably to neuroscience by enabling the extracellular detection of low-frequency local field potential oscillations and high-frequency action potentials of single units. Nevertheless, several long-standing limitations exist, including low multiplexity, deleterious chronic immune responses and long-term recording instability. Driven by initiatives encouraging the generation of novel neurotechnologies and the maturation of technologies to fabricate high-density electronics, novel electrode technologies are emerging. Here, we provide an overview of recently developed neural recording electrode technologies with high spatial integration, long-term stability and multiple functionalities. We describe how these emergent neurotechnologies can approach the ultimate goal of illuminating chronic brain activity with minimal disruption of the neural environment, thereby providing unprecedented opportunities for neuroscience research in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Similarly, both in academic and industry settings, approaches are being developed to improve throughput, sampling, biocompatibility and stability of MEAs183–186.”
From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [185]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35084005 · Cited by 6,551
The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat
O'Keefe, J., & Dostrovsky, J. (1971) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(71)90358-1 · Cited by 6,151
Nanowire Nanosensors for Highly Sensitive and Selective Detection of Biological and Chemical Species
Cui, Y., Wei, Q., Park, H., & Lieber, C. M. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1062711 · Cited by 5,857
Self-citationReceptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1959) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006308 · Cited by 4,653
The origin of extracellular fields and currents — EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes
Buzsáki, G., Anastassiou, C. A., & Koch, C. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3241 · Cited by 4,225
Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex
Hafting, T., Fyhn, M., Molden, S., Moser, M.-B., & Moser, E. I. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03721 · Cited by 4,068
Theta oscillations in the hippocampus
Buzsáki, G. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00586-x · Cited by 3,332
Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia
Hochberg, L. R., Serruya, M. D., Friehs, G. M., Mukand, J. A., Saleh, M., Caplan, A. H., Branner, A., Chen, D., Penn, R. D., & Donoghue, J. P. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04970 · Cited by 3,295
Near-infrared fluorophores for biomedical imaging
Hong, G., Antaris, A. L., & Dai, H. (2017) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-016-0010 · Cited by 3,048
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Carter, M. & Shieh, J. C. Guide to Research Techniques in Neuroscience (Academic Press, 2015).
- Kandel, E. R. Principles of Neural Science (McGraw-Hill, 2013).
- Johnson, B. C. et al. in 2018 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conf. (CICC) 1–4 (IEEE, 2018).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neuropixels 2.0: A miniaturized high-density probe for stable, long-term brain recordings.
Steinmetz, N. A., Aydin, C., Lebedeva, A., Okun, M., Pachitariu, M., Bauza, M., Beau, M., Bhagat, J., Böhm, C., Broux, M., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abf4588 · Cited by 1,173
An Integrated Brain-Machine Interface Platform With Thousands of Channels
Musk, E., & Neuralink (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16194 · Cited by 1,206
Hydrogel interfaces for merging humans and machines
Yuk, H., Wu, J., & Zhao, X. (2022) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-022-00483-4 · Cited by 720
A tissue-like neurotransmitter sensor for the brain and gut
Li, J., Liu, Y., Yuan, L., Zhang, B., Bishop, E. S., Wang, K., Tang, J., Zheng, Y., Xu, W., Niu, S., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04615-2 · Cited by 446
Wang, L., Xie, S., Wang, Z., Liu, F., Yang, Y., Tang, C., Wu, X., Liu, P., Li, Y., Saiyin, H., et al. (2019) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-019-0462-8 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, G., & Lieber, C. M.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lieber, Charles M.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Neuroscience
- Published
- 2019-03-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 330-345
- ISSN
- 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0048
- PMC
- PMC6531316
- OpenAlex
- W2920339115
- Cited by
- 695
- References
- 157
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 117 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 110 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 19
- FWCI
- 10.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2019-04-16)
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (R00AG056636)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (DP1EB025835)
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- neural recording electrodes, single-unit recording, chronic neural recording, multifunctional electrodes, extracellular recording, neurotechnology
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Brain, Electrodes, Electrodes, Implanted, Humans, Neurons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
