The DOI matches its Crossref record; 175 of the 175 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genomic and phenotypic heterogeneity in prostate cancer
Open accessAbstract
From a clinical, morphological and molecular perspective, prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Primary prostate cancers are often multifocal, having topographically and morphologically distinct tumour foci. Sequencing studies have revealed that individual tumour foci can arise as clonally distinct lesions with no shared driver gene alterations. This finding demonstrates that multiple genomically and phenotypically distinct primary prostate cancers can be present in an individual patient. Lethal metastatic prostate cancer seems to arise from a single clone in the primary tumour but can exhibit subclonal heterogeneity at the genomic, epigenetic and phenotypic levels. Collectively, this complex heterogeneous constellation of molecular alterations poses obstacles for the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. However, advances in our understanding of intra-tumoural heterogeneity and the development of novel technologies will allow us to navigate these challenges, refine approaches for translational research and ultimately improve patient care. This Review summarizes the manifestations of inter-tumoural and intra-tumoural heterogeneity in primary and metastatic prostate cancer, emphasizing the contribution of genomics studies and discussing the importance of phenotypic changes. The authors also critically discuss the implications for clinical management and research. Primary prostate cancers are often multifocal with spatial and morphologically distinct tumour foci. Individual tumour foci can show non-overlapping truncal genomic alterations, suggesting that multiple clonally distinct cancers can arise in a given patient. Intra-tumoural and inter-tumoural heterogeneity present within the prostate gland poses diagnostic challenges. Despite the multiclonality of primary cancer, clonal bottlenecks imposed by the metastatic process and further by therapeutic interventions seem to select for a single dominant clone in lethal metastatic prostate cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., & Jemal, A. (2018) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21442 · Cited by 16,579
Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans
Exome Aggregation Consortium, Lek, M., Karczewski, K. J., Minikel, E. V., Samocha, K. E., Banks, E., Fennell, T., O’Donnell-Luria, A. H., Ware, J. S., Hill, A. J., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19057 · Cited by 9,587
Intratumor Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion Sequencing
Gerlinger, M., Rowan, A. J., Horswell, S., Larkin, J., Endesfelder, D., Gronroos, E., Martinez, P., Matthews, N., Stewart, A., Tarpey, P., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1113205 · Cited by 7,774
A Perspective on Cancer Cell Metastasis
Chaffer, C. L., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1203543 · Cited by 4,807
Integrative Clinical Genomics of Advanced Prostate Cancer
Robinson, D., Van Allen, E. M., Wu, Y.-M., Schultz, N., Lonigro, R. J., Mosquera, J.-M., Montgomery, B., Taplin, M.-E., Pritchard, C. C., Attard, G., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.001 · Cited by 3,645
Self-citationGreaves, M., & Maley, C. C. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10762 · Cited by 3,162
Natural History of Progression After PSA Elevation Following Radical Prostatectomy
Pound, C. R. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.17.1591 · Cited by 3,071
Chemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
Sweeney, C. J., Chen, Y.-H., Carducci, M., Liu, G., Jarrard, D. F., Eisenberger, M., Wong, Y.-N., Hahn, N., Kohli, M., Cooney, M. M., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1503747 · Cited by 2,896
A Chromatin-Mediated Reversible Drug-Tolerant State in Cancer Cell Subpopulations
Sharma, S. V., Lee, D. Y., Li, B., Quinlan, M. P., Takahashi, F., Maheswaran, S., McDermott, U., Azizian, N., Zou, L., Fischbach, M. A., et al. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.027 · Cited by 2,770
AR-V7 and Resistance to Enzalutamide and Abiraterone in Prostate Cancer
Antonarakis, E. S., Lu, C., Wang, H., Luber, B., Nakazawa, M., Roeser, J. C., Chen, Y., Mohammad, T. A., Chen, Y., Fedor, H. L., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1315815 · Cited by 2,710
Cited by
Notch signaling pathway in cancer: from mechanistic insights to targeted therapies
Shi, Q., Xue, C., Zeng, Y., Yuan, X., Chu, Q., Jiang, S., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhu, D., & Li, L. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01828-x · Cited by 401
Fan, H., Li, J., Manuel, A. M., & Zhao, Z. (2023) · Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2023.02.022 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Haffner, M. C., Zwart, W., Roudier, M. P., True, L. D., Nelson, W. G., Epstein, J. I., De Marzo, A. M., Nelson, P. S., & Yegnasubramanian, S.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Urology
- Published
- 2020-12-16
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 79-92
- ISSN
- 1759-4812 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-4820
- OpenAlex
- W3111149356
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 175
- FWCI
- 10.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic and phenotypic heterogeneity in prostate cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41585-020-00400-w
- The paper
- Haffner, M. C., Zwart, W., Roudier, M. P., True, L. D., Nelson, W. G., Epstein, J. I., De Marzo, A. M., Nelson, P. S., & Yegnasubramanian, S. (2021). Genomic and phenotypic heterogeneity in prostate cancer. Nature Reviews Urology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-020-00400-w
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.