The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 3 are not checked yet.
Large deletions induced by Cas9 cleavage
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Adikusama et al. targeted six genes in a total of 127 early mouse embryos and detected large deletions (between 100bp and 2.3kb) in 45% of their samples using long-range PCR (10).”
From Frequent loss of heterozygosity in CRISPR-Cas9–edited early human embryos (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“CRISPR-Cas9-induced deletions larger than these fragments in either direction would eliminate one or both PCR primer annealing sites.This in turn can lead to amplification of only one allele, giving the false impression that targeting was unsuccessful or that there is a single homozygous event at the on-target site (9,10,15).”
From Frequent loss of heterozygosity in CRISPR-Cas9–edited early human embryos (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Of note, large deletions were generally more prevalent when they targeted intronic regions (>70%) than when they targeted exons (20%).”
From Frequent loss of heterozygosity in CRISPR-Cas9–edited early human embryos (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339
Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system
Ran, F. A., Hsu, P. D., Wright, J., Agarwala, V., Scott, D. A., & Zhang, F. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.143 · Cited by 11,133
Wang, H., Yang, H., Shivalila, C. S., Dawlaty, M. M., Cheng, A. W., Zhang, F., & Jaenisch, R. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.025 · Cited by 3,495
Kosicki, M., Tomberg, K., & Bradley, A. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4192 · Cited by 1,883
Correction of a pathogenic gene mutation in human embryos
Ma, H., Marti-Gutierrez, N., Park, S.-W., Wu, J., Lee, Y., Suzuki, K., Koski, A., Ji, D., Hayama, T., Ahmed, R., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23305 · Cited by 992
CRISPR/Cas9 targeting events cause complex deletions and insertions at 17 sites in the mouse genome
Shin, H. Y., Wang, C., Lee, H., Yoo, K. H., Zeng, X., Kuhns, T. M., Yang, C. M., Mohr, T., Liu, C., & Hennighausen, L. G. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15464 · Cited by 317
Somatic CRISPR/Cas9-mediated tumour suppressor disruption enables versatile brain tumour modelling
Zuckermann, M., Hovestadt, V., Knobbe-Thomsen, C. B., Zapatka, M., Northcott, P. A., Schramm, K., Belic, J., Jones, D. T. W., Tschida, B., Moriarity, B., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8391 · Cited by 283
Inter-homologue repair in fertilized human eggs?
Egli, D., Zuccaro, M. V., Kosicki, M., Church, G. M., Bradley, A., & Jasin, M. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0379-5 · Cited by 111
Parikh, B. A., Beckman, D. L., Patel, S. J., White, J. M., & Yokoyama, W. M. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116484 · Cited by 55
Efficient Detection, Quantification and Enrichment of Subtle Allelic Alterations
Chen, J., Zhang, X., Wang, T., Li, Z., Guan, G., & Hong, Y. (2012) · DNA Research · doi:10.1093/dnares/dss023 · Cited by 55
Cited by
Sorted by citations
CRISPR/Cas9 therapeutics: progress and prospects
Li, T., Yang, Y., Qi, H., Cui, W., Zhang, L., Fu, X., He, X., Liu, M., Li, P., & Yu, T. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01309-7 · Cited by 824
Chromothripsis as an on-target consequence of CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing
Leibowitz, M. L., Papathanasiou, S., Doerfler, P. A., Blaine, L. J., Sun, L., Yao, Y., Zhang, C.-Z., Weiss, M. J., & Pellman, D. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00838-7 · Cited by 583
CRISPR-Based Therapeutic Genome Editing: Strategies and In Vivo Delivery by AAV Vectors
Wang, D., Zhang, F., & Gao, G. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.023 · Cited by 539
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing induces megabase-scale chromosomal truncations
Cullot, G., Boutin, J., Toutain, J., Prat, F., Pennamen, P., Rooryck, C., Teichmann, M., Rousseau, E., Lamrissi-Garcia, I., Guyonnet-Duperat, V., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09006-2 · Cited by 474
DNA Repair Pathway Choices in CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing
Xue, C., & Greene, E. C. (2021) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2021.02.008 · Cited by 431
Allele-Specific Chromosome Removal after Cas9 Cleavage in Human Embryos
Zuccaro, M. V., Xu, J., Mitchell, C., Marin, D., Zimmerman, R., Rana, B., Weinstein, E., King, R. T., Palmerola, K. L., Smith, M. E., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.025 · Cited by 303
CRISPR technologies for genome, epigenome and transcriptome editing
Villiger, L., Joung, J., Koblan, L. W., Weissman, J. S., Abudayyeh, O. O., & Gootenberg, J. S. (2024) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-023-00697-6 · Cited by 280
Frequent loss of heterozygosity in CRISPR-Cas9–edited early human embryos
Alanis-Lobato, G., Zohren, J., McCarthy, A., Fogarty, N. M. E., Kubikova, N., Hardman, E., Greco, M., Wells, D., Turner, J. M. A., & Niakan, K. K. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2004832117 · Cited by 234
Genotoxic effects of base and prime editing in human hematopoietic stem cells
Fiumara, M., Ferrari, S., Omer-Javed, A., Beretta, S., Albano, L., Canarutto, D., Varesi, A., Gaddoni, C., Brombin, C., Cugnata, F., et al. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01915-4 · Cited by 220
CRISPR-based genome editing through the lens of DNA repair
Nambiar, T. S., Baudrier, L., Billon, P., & Ciccia, A. (2022) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.12.026 · Cited by 227
Frequent aneuploidy in primary human T cells after CRISPR–Cas9 cleavage
Nahmad, A. D., Reuveni, E., Goldschmidt, E., Tenne, T., Liberman, M., Horovitz‐Fried, M., Khosravi, R., Kobo, H., Reinstein, E., Madi, A., et al. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01377-0 · Cited by 246
Mitigation of chromosome loss in clinical CRISPR-Cas9-engineered T cells
Tsuchida, C. A., Brandes, N., Bueno, R., Trinidad, M. I., Mazumder, T., Yu, B., Hwang, B., Chang, C. R., Liu, J., Sun, Y., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.041 · Cited by 220
Assessing and advancing the safety of CRISPR-Cas tools: from DNA to RNA editing
Tao, J., Bauer, D. E., & Chiarle, R. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-35886-6 · Cited by 232
In vivo prime editing of a metabolic liver disease in mice
Böck, D., Rothgangl, T., Villiger, L., Schmidheini, L., Matsushita, M., Mathis, N., Ioannidi, E. I., Rimann, N., Grisch‐Chan, H. M., Kreutzer, S., et al. (2022) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abl9238 · Cited by 201
Höijer, I., Emmanouilidou, A., Östlund, R., van Schendel, R., Bozorgpana, S., Tijsterman, M., Feuk, L., Gyllensten, U. B., den Hoed, M., & Ameur, A. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28244-5 · Cited by 205
Development of CRISPR-Cas systems for genome editing and beyond
Zhang, F. (2019) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583519000052 · Cited by 188
Zhang, B. (2020) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.30064 · Cited by 191
Precision genome editing using cytosine and adenine base editors in mammalian cells
Huang, T. P., Newby, G. A., & Liu, D. R. (2021) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-020-00450-9 · Cited by 175
Assessment of Cas12a‐mediated gene editing efficiency in plants
Bernabé‐Orts, J. M., Casas‐Rodrigo, I., Minguet, E. G., Landolfi, V., García‐Carpintero, V., Gianoglio, S., Vázquez‐Vilar, M., Granell, A., & Orzáez, D. (2019) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13113 · Cited by 148
Lampe, G. D., King, R. T., Halpin-Healy, T. S., Klompe, S. E., Hogan, M. I., Vo, P. L. H., Tang, S., Chavez, A., & Sternberg, S. H. (2023) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01748-1 · Cited by 154
Huang, T., & Puchta, H. (2019) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-019-02379-0 · Cited by 153
Microhomologies are prevalent at Cas9-induced larger deletions
Owens, D. D. G., Caulder, A., Frontera, V., Harman, J. R., Allan, A. J., Bucakci, A., Greder, L., Codner, G. F., Hublitz, P., McHugh, P. J., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz459 · Cited by 136
Ferrari, S., Jacob, A., Cesana, D., Laugel, M., Beretta, S., Varesi, A., Unali, G., Conti, A., Canarutto, D., Albano, L., et al. (2022) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2022.09.001 · Cited by 133
Whole chromosome loss and genomic instability in mouse embryos after CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing
Papathanasiou, S., Markoulaki, S., Blaine, L. J., Leibowitz, M. L., Zhang, C., Jaenisch, R., & Pellman, D. S. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26097-y · Cited by 129
Cytosine base editing enables quadruple-edited allogeneic CART cells for T-ALL
Diorio, C. J., Murray, R. C., Naniong, M., Barrera, L. A., Camblin, A. J., Chukinas, J. A., Coholan, L. J., Edwards, A., Fuller, T. J., Gonzales, C., et al. (2022) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.2022015825 · Cited by 134
Detection of Deleterious On-Target Effects after HDR-Mediated CRISPR Editing
Weisheit, I., Kroeger, J. A., Malik, R., Klimmt, J., Crusius, D., Dannert, A., Dichgans, M., & Paquet, D. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107689 · Cited by 125
Expanding the CRISPR Toolbox in Zebrafish for Studying Development and Disease
Liu, K., Petree, C., Requena, T., Varshney, P., & Varshney, G. K. (2019) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2019.00013 · Cited by 139
Hunt, J., Samson, C., du Rand, A., & Sheppard, H. M. (2023) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-023-02561-1 · Cited by 141
Simultaneous precise editing of multiple genes in human cells
Riesenberg, S., Chintalapati, M., Macak, D., Kanis, P., Maričić, T., & Pääbo, S. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz669 · Cited by 127
Cas9-induced large deletions and small indels are controlled in a convergent fashion
Kosicki, M., Allen, F., Steward, F., Tomberg, K., Pan, Y., & Bradley, A. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30480-8 · Cited by 115
Efficient precise in vivo base editing in adult dystrophic mice
Xu, L. M., Zhang, C., Bailin, P. L., Wang, P., Gao, Y., Mohler, P. J., Mokadam, N. A., Ma, J., Arnold, W. D., & Han, R. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23996-y · Cited by 118
Inter-homologue repair in fertilized human eggs?
Egli, D., Zuccaro, M. V., Kosicki, M., Church, G. M., Bradley, A., & Jasin, M. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0379-5 · Cited by 111
Global detection of DNA repair outcomes induced by CRISPR–Cas9
Liu, M., Zhang, W., Xin, C., Yin, J., Shang, Y., Chen, A., Li, J., Meng, F., & Hu, J. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab686 · Cited by 117
Bennett, E., Petersen, B. L., Johansen, I. E., Niu, Y., Yang, Z., Chamberlain, C. A., Met, Ö., Wandall, H. H., & Frödin, M. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa975 · Cited by 108
Cas9 exo-endonuclease eliminates chromosomal translocations during genome editing
Yin, J., Lu, R., Xin, C., Wang, Y., Ling, X., Li, D., Zhang, W., Liu, M., Xie, W., Kong, L., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28900-w · Cited by 104
Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA editing in human cells with zinc finger deaminases
Lim, K., Cho, S.-I., & Kim, J. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-27962-0 · Cited by 100
Off-target effects in CRISPR-Cas genome editing for human therapeutics: Progress and challenges
Kalter, N., Fuster‐García, C., Silva, A., Ronco-Díaz, V., Roncelli, S., Turchiano, G., Gorodkin, J., Cathomen, T., Benabdellah, K., Lee, C. M., et al. (2025) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102636 · Cited by 121
Park, S. H., Cao, M., Pan, Y., Davis, T., Saxena, L., Deshmukh, H., Fu, Y., Treangen, T. J., Sheehan, V., & Bao, G. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abo7676 · Cited by 92
Long-term correction of hemophilia B using adenoviral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9
Stephens, C. J., Lauron, E. J., Kashentseva, E. A., Lu, Z. H., Yokoyama, W. M., & Curiel, D. T. (2019) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.02.009 · Cited by 89
Yu, M., Hu, S., Tang, B., Yang, H., & Sun, D. (2023) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108202 · Cited by 92
Efficient high-precision homology-directed repair-dependent genome editing by HDRobust
Riesenberg, S., Kanis, P., Macak, D., Wollny, D., Düsterhöft, D., Kowalewski, J., Helmbrecht, N., Maričić, T., & Pääbo, S. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-023-01949-1 · Cited by 87
Optimized nickase- and nuclease-based prime editing in human and mouse cells
Adikusuma, F., Lushington, C., Arudkumar, J., Godahewa, G. I., Chey, Y. C. J., Gierus, L., Piltz, S., Geiger, A., Jain, Y., Reti, D., et al. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab792 · Cited by 90
Self-citationFrequency and mechanisms of LINE-1 retrotransposon insertions at CRISPR/Cas9 sites
Tao, J., Wang, Q., Mendez‐Dorantes, C., Burns, K. H., & Chiarle, R. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31322-3 · Cited by 91
Pavani, G., Fabiano, A., Laurent, M., Amor, F., Cantelli, E., Chalumeau, A., Maule, G., Tachtsidi, A., Concordet, J., Cereseto, A., et al. (2021) · Blood Advances · doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001996 · Cited by 88
Efficient embryonic homozygous gene conversion via RAD51-enhanced interhomolog repair
Wilde, J. J., Aida, T., del Rosario, R. C. H., Kaiser, T., Qi, P., Wienisch, M., Zhang, Q., Colvin, S. M., & Feng, G. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.035 · Cited by 97
Genome editing methods in animal models
Lee, H., Yoon, D. E., & Kim, K. (2020) · Animal Cells and Systems · doi:10.1080/19768354.2020.1726462 · Cited by 83
Sanjurjo-Soriano, C., Erkilic, N., Baux, D., Mamaeva, D. V., Hamel, C., Meunier, I., Roux, A., & Kalatzis, V. (2019) · Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development · doi:10.1016/j.omtm.2019.11.016 · Cited by 82
Boutin, J., Rosier, J., Cappellen, D., Prat, F., Toutain, J., Pennamen, P., Bouron, J., Rooryck, C., Merlio, J., Lamrissi‐Garcia, I., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25190-6 · Cited by 82
Large-Fragment Deletions Induced by Cas9 Cleavage while Not in the BEs System
Song, Y., Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Chen, M., Sui, T., Lai, L., & Li, Z. (2020) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2020.06.019 · Cited by 74
Therapy in Rhodopsin-Mediated Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa
Meng, D., Ragi, S. D., & Tsang, S. H. (2020) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.08.012 · Cited by 75
Schimmel, J., Muñoz-Subirana, N., Kool, H., van Schendel, R., van der Vlies, S., Kamp, J. A., de Vrij, F. M. S., Kushner, S. A., Smith, G. C. M., Boulton, S. J., et al. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112019 · Cited by 72
Advances in CRISPR-Cas technology and its applications: revolutionising precision medicine
Azeez, S. S., Hamad, R. S., Hamad, B., Shekha, M. S., & Bergsten, P. (2024) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2024.1509924 · Cited by 88
Principles of and strategies for germline gene therapy
Wolf, D. P., Mitalipov, P. A., & Mitalipov, S. M. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0473-8 · Cited by 75
Wen, W., Quan, Z.-J., Li, S.-A., Yang, Z.-X., Fu, Y.-W., Zhang, F., Li, G., Zhao, M., Yin, M., Xu, J., et al. (2021) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02462-4 · Cited by 77
Genetic engineering meets hematopoietic stem cell biology for next-generation gene therapy
Ferrari, S., Valeri, E., Conti, A., Scala, S., Aprile, A., Micco, R. D., Kajaste‐Rudnitski, A., Montini, E., Ferrari, G., Aiuti, A., et al. (2023) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2023.04.014 · Cited by 75
van de Kooij, B., Kruswick, A., van Attikum, H., & Yaffe, M. B. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32743-w · Cited by 68
Gene editing and its applications in biomedicine
Li, G., Li, X., Zhuang, S., Wang, L., Zhu, Y., Chen, Y., Sun, W. C., Wu, Z., Zhou, Z. L., Chen, J., et al. (2022) · Science China Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11427-021-2057-0 · Cited by 66
Simkin, D., Papakis, V., Bustos, B. I., Ambrosi, C. M., Ryan, S. J., Baru, V., Williams, L. A., Dempsey, G. T., McManus, O. B., Landers, J. E., et al. (2022) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.02.008 · Cited by 68
Hwang, G., Lee, S., Oh, M., Kim, S., Habib, O., Jang, H., Kim, H. S., Kim, Y., Kim, C. H., Kim, S., et al. (2024) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-024-01277-5 · Cited by 83
CRISPR/Cas9 for Sickle Cell Disease: Applications, Future Possibilities, and Challenges
Demirci, S., Leonard, A., Haro-Mora, J. J., Uchida, N., & Tisdale, J. F. (2019) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/5584_2018_331 · Cited by 50
In-depth assessment of the PAM compatibility and editing activities of Cas9 variants
Zhang, W., Yin, J., Zhangding, Z., Xin, C., Liu, M., Wang, Y., Chen, A., & Hu, J. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab507 · Cited by 66
CRISPR gene editing in human embryos wreaks chromosomal mayhem
Ledford, H. K. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-020-01906-4 · Cited by 64
Marchetti, F., Cardoso, R., Chen, C. L., Douglas, G. R., Elloway, J. M., Escobar, P. A., Harper, T. A., Heflich, R. H., Kidd, D., Lynch, A. M., et al. (2023) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2023.108466 · Cited by 71
Lea, R. A., & Niakan, K. K. (2019) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-019-0424-0 · Cited by 62
ON-Target Adverse Events of CRISPR-Cas9 Nuclease: More Chaotic than Expected
Boutin, J., Cappellen, D., Rosier, J., Amintas, S., Dabernat, S., Bedel, A., & Moreau‐Gaudry, F. (2022) · The CRISPR Journal · doi:10.1089/crispr.2021.0120 · Cited by 59
Bayraktar, E. C., La, K., Karpman, K., Unlu, G., Ozerdem, C., Ritter, D. J., Alwaseem, H., Molina, H., Hoffmann, H.-H., Millner, A., et al. (2020) · Nature Metabolism · doi:10.1038/s42255-020-0206-9 · Cited by 60
Jo, D. H., Jang, H., Cho, C. S., Han, J. H., Ryu, G., Jung, Y., Bae, S., & Kim, J. H. (2022) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2022.11.021 · Cited by 61
Engineering strategies to safely drive CAR T-cells into the future
Rossi, M., & Breman, E. (2024) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1411393 · Cited by 68
Recent advances in therapeutic gene-editing technologies
Liu, D., Cao, D., & Han, R. (2025) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.03.026 · Cited by 70
Harnessing DSB repair to promote efficient homology-dependent and -independent prime editing
Peterka, M., Akrap, N., Li, S., Wimberger, S., Hsieh, P.-P., Degtev, D., Bestas, B., Barr, J., van de Plassche, S., Mendoza-García, P., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28771-1 · Cited by 57
CRISPR technology: The engine that drives cancer therapy
Zhang, M., Eshraghian, E. A., Jammal, O. A., Zhang, Z.-B., & Zhu, X. M. (2020) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2020.111007 · Cited by 54
Turocy, J. M., Adashi, E. Y., & Egli, D. M. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.036 · Cited by 56
The contribution of DNA repair pathways to genome editing and evolution in filamentous pathogens
Huang, J. T., & Cook, D. E. (2022) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuac035 · Cited by 57
Lazar, N. H., Çelik, S., Chen, L., Fay, M. M., Irish, J. C., Jensen, J., Tillinghast, C. A., Urbanik, J., Bone, W. P., Roberts, G. H. L., et al. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01758-y · Cited by 52
Programmable epigenome editing by transient delivery of CRISPR epigenome editor ribonucleoproteins
Xu, D. Z., Besselink, S., Ramadoss, G. N., Dierks, P. H., Lubin, J. P., Pattali, R. K., Brim, J. I., Christenson, A. E., Colias, P. J., Ornelas, I. J., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63167-x · Cited by 60
Recent advances in functional genomics for parasitic nematodes of mammals
Castelletto, M. L., Gang, S. S., & Hallem, E. A. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.206482 · Cited by 52
Gelinsky, E., & Hilbeck, A. (2018) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-018-0182-9 · Cited by 51
Xu, L. M., Lau, Y. S., Gao, Y., Bailin, P. L., & Han, R. (2019) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.05.001 · Cited by 51
CRISPR–Cas13: Pioneering RNA Editing for Nucleic Acid Therapeutics
Zhu, G., Zhou, X., Wen, M., Qiao, J., Guo, L., & Yao, Y. (2024) · BioDesign Research · doi:10.34133/bdr.0041 · Cited by 55
Causal machine learning for single-cell genomics
Tejada-Lapuerta, A., Bertin, P., Bauer, S., Aliee, H., Bengio, Y., & Theis, F. J. (2025) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-025-02124-2 · Cited by 79
Homology-based repair induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in mammalian embryo genome editing
Zhang, X., Li, T., Ou, J., Huang, J., & Liang, P. (2021) · Protein & Cell · doi:10.1007/s13238-021-00838-7 · Cited by 47
The design and engineering of synthetic genomes
James, J. S., Dai, J., Chew, W. L., & Cai, Y. (2024) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-024-00786-y · Cited by 52
Ma, H., Martí‐Gutiérrez, N., Park, S.-W., Wu, J., Hayama, T., Darby, H., Dyken, C. V., Li, Y., Koski, A., Liang, D., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0381-y · Cited by 45
Liu, S.-C., Feng, Y.-L., Sun, X., Chen, R.-D., Liu, Q., Xiao, J., Zhang, J., Huang, Z., Xiang, J.-F., Chen, G., et al. (2022) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-022-02736-5 · Cited by 43
State-of-the-Art 2019 on Gene Therapy for Phenylketonuria
Grisch‐Chan, H. M., Schwank, G., Harding, C. O., & Thöny, B. (2019) · Human Gene Therapy · doi:10.1089/hum.2019.111 · Cited by 45
Huang, J. T., Rowe, D., Subedi, P., Zhang, W., Suelter, T., Valent, B. S., & Cook, D. E. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34736-1 · Cited by 41
CRISPR-based strategies for targeted transgene knock-in and gene correction
Lau, C., Tin, C., & Suh, Y. (2020) · Faculty Reviews · doi:10.12703/r/9-20 · Cited by 46
Alariqi, M., Ramadan, M., Yu, L., Hui, F., Hussain, A., Zhou, X., Yu, Y., Zhang, X., & Jin, S. (2025) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202416331 · Cited by 42
A CRISPR endonuclease gene drive reveals distinct mechanisms of inheritance bias
Verkuijl, S. A. N., González, E., Li, M., Ang, J. X. D., Kandul, N. P., Anderson, M. A. E., Akbari, O. S., Bonsall, M. B., & Alphey, L. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34739-y · Cited by 40
Factors affecting the cleavage efficiency of the CRISPR-Cas9 system
Jung, W. J., Park, S.-J., Cha, S., & Kim, K. (2024) · Animal Cells and Systems · doi:10.1080/19768354.2024.2322054 · Cited by 42
Epigenetic Regulation of Aging and its Rejuvenation
An, Y., Wang, Q., Gao, K., Zhang, C., Ouyang, Y., Li, R., Zhou, M., Wu, T., Zhou, L., Xie, Z., et al. (2025) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.70369 · Cited by 47
Long-read individual-molecule sequencing reveals CRISPR-induced genetic heterogeneity in human ESCs
Bi, C., Wang, L., Yuan, B., Zhou, X., Pang, Y., Li, Y., Wang, S., Gao, X., Huang, Y., & Li, M. (2020) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02143-8 · Cited by 38
The Challenges in Developing Efficient and Robust Synthetic Homing Endonuclease Gene Drives
Verkuijl, S. A. N., Ang, J. X. D., Alphey, L., Bonsall, M. B., & Anderson, M. A. E. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.856981 · Cited by 36
CRISPR–Cas9 gene editing induced complex on-target outcomes in human cells
Wen, W., & Zhang, X. (2022) · Experimental Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2022.03.002 · Cited by 41
Li, J., Shen, Z., Liu, Y., Yan, Z., Liu, Y., Lin, X., Tang, J., Lv, R., Geng, G., Xiong, Z., et al. (2023) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2023.02.015 · Cited by 40
Cell cycle arrest and p53 prevent ON-target megabase-scale rearrangements induced by CRISPR-Cas9
Cullot, G., Boutin, J., Fayet, S., Prat, F., Rosier, J., Cappellen, D., Lamrissi‐Garcia, I., Pennamen, P., Bouron, J., Amintas, S., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39632-w · Cited by 37
Collateral damage and CRISPR genome editing
Thomas, M., Burgio, G., Adams, D. J., & Iyer, V. (2019) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007994 · Cited by 42
Efficient base editing by RNA-guided cytidine base editors (CBEs) in pigs
Yuan, H., Yu, T., Wang, L., Yang, L., Zhang, Y., Liu, H., Li, M., Tang, X., Liu, Z., Li, Z., et al. (2019) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-019-03205-2 · Cited by 40
Targeted Gene Delivery: Where to Land
Pavani, G., & Amendola, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2020.609650 · Cited by 41
Simple and reliable detection of CRISPR-induced on-target effects by qgPCR and SNP genotyping
Weisheit, I., Kroeger, J. A., Malik, R., Wefers, B., Lichtner, P., Wurst, W., Dichgans, M., & Paquet, D. (2021) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-020-00481-2 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Adikusuma, F., Piltz, S., Corbett, M. A., Turvey, M., McColl, S. R., Helbig, K. J., Beard, M. R., Hughes, J., Pomerantz, R. T., & Thomas, P. Q.
- Affiliations
- Diponegoro University (ID)
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (AU)
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SG)
- La Trobe University (AU)
- Temple University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thomas, Paul Q.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 560
- Issue
- 7717
- Pages
- E8-E9
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2885661865
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 10
- FWCI
- 10.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Oregon Health and Science University
- Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute
- Temple University
- Consorzio Interuniversitario Biotecnologie
- Moxie Foundation
- La Trobe University
- University of Adelaide
- Government of Jiangxi Province
- Universitas Diponegoro
- Institute for Basic Science (IBSR021-D1, R021-D1)
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Keywords
- CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, MYBPC3 mutation, large deletions, DNA double-strand break repair, mouse embryo model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review