The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine behaviour
Open accessAbstract
Machines powered by artificial intelligence increasingly mediate our social, cultural, economic and political interactions. Understanding the behaviour of artificial intelligence systems is essential to our ability to control their actions, reap their benefits and minimize their harms. Here we argue that this necessitates a broad scientific research agenda to study machine behaviour that incorporates and expands upon the discipline of computer science and includes insights from across the sciences. We first outline a set of questions that are fundamental to this emerging field and then explore the technical, legal and institutional constraints on the study of machine behaviour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Such endogenous coordination failures blur the line between attack and accident (Leibo et al., 2017;Rahwan et al., 2019), reinforcing that defenses must account for both malicious swarms and emergent collective behaviors.”
From Open Challenges in Multi-Agent Security: Towards Secure Systems of Interacting AI Agents (2025) · cites this paper as Rahwan et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Augmentation is therefore a coevolutionary process during which humans learn from machines and machines learn from humans (Amershi, Cakmak, Knox, & Kulesza, 2014;Rahwan et al., 2019).”
From Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox (2021) · cites this paper as Rahwan et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Only such studies can examine the feedback loops between human influence on machine behavior and machine influence on human behavior, which cause the emergent behaviors that are otherwise impossible to predict (Rahwan et al., 2019).”
From Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox (2021) · cites this paper as Rahwan et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Computer scientists may be expert technologists, but they are generally not trained social or behavioral scientists (Rahwan et al., 2019).”
From Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox (2021) · cites this paper as Rahwan et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These differences lead to entirely new machine behaviors (Rahwan et al., 2019).”
From Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox (2021) · cites this paper as Rahwan et al., 2019
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Openly available, robust natural language generation (NLG) algorithms have an ability to generate human-like texts across multiple domains”
From Value attributed to text-based archives generated by artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“This means that research into the beliefs and cognitive processes underlying LLMs need to resort to more indirect and interdisciplinary methods (Rahwan et al., 2019).”
From Exploring the psychology of LLMs’ moral and legal reasoning (2024) · cites this paper as Rahwan et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“First, we demonstrate the effectiveness of experimental economics methods in studying choice behavior of artificial intelligence (43), which adds earlier studies of children (23, 30), monkeys (31), rats, and pigeons (32).”
From The emergence of economic rationality of GPT (2023) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context
Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · Cited by 45,460
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380
BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation
Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., & Zhu, W.-J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '02 · doi:10.3115/1073083.1073135 · Cited by 21,344
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778 · Cited by 17,555
Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16961 · Cited by 15,612
Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge
Silver, D., Schrittwieser, J., Simonyan, K., Antonoglou, I., Huang, A., Guez, A., Hubert, T., Baker, L., Lai, M., Bolton, A., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24270 · Cited by 9,084
The spread of true and false news online
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 · Cited by 8,847
Intriguing properties of neural networks
Szegedy, C., Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., Bruna, J., Erhan, D., Goodfellow, I., & Fergus, R. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6199 · Cited by 8,143
The relationship between Precision-Recall and ROC curves
Davis, J., & Goadrich, M. (2006) · Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning - ICML '06 · doi:10.1145/1143844.1143874 · Cited by 6,559
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao2998 · Cited by 4,160
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Simon, H. A. The Sciences of the Artificial (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1969). Simon asks whether there can be a science of the ‘artificial’ that produces knowledge about artificial objects and phenomena.
- Kleinberg, J., Lakkaraju, H., Leskovec, J., Ludwig, J. & Mullainathan, S. Human decisions and machine predictions. Q. J. Econ. 133, 237–293 (2018).
- Amodei, D. et al. Concrete problems in AI safety. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06565 (2016). · arXiv
- Bessi, A. & Ferrara, E. Social bots distort the 2016 U.S. Presidential election online discussion. First Monday 21, 11 (2016).
- Tufekci, Z. Engineering the public: big data, surveillance and computational politics. First Monday 19, 7 (2014).
- Cartlidge, J., Szostek, C., De Luca, M. & Cliff, D. Too fast too furious—faster financial-market trading agents can give less efficient markets. In Proc. 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence 126–135 (2012).
- Doshi-Velez, F. & Kim, B. Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08608 (2017). · arXiv
- Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S. & Raghavan, M. Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.05807 (2016). · arXiv
- Buolamwini, J. & Gebru, T. Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Proc. 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (eds Friedler, S. A. & Wilson, C.) 81, 77–91 (PMLR, 2018).
- Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J. Y., Saligrama, V. & Kalai, A. T. Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? Debiasing word embeddings. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 4349–4357 (2016).
- Sweeney, L. Discrimination in online ad delivery. Queueing Syst. 11, 10 (2013).
- Ensign, D., Friedler, S. A., Neville, S., Scheidegger, C. & Venkatasubramanian, S. Runaway feedback loops in predictive policing. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.09847 (2017). · arXiv
- Chouldechova, A., Benavides-Prado, D., Fialko, O. & Vaithianathan, R. A case study of algorithm-assisted decision making in child maltreatment hotline screening decisions. In Proc. 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (eds Friedler, S. A. & Wilson, C.) 81, 134–148 (PMLR, 2018).
- Zhou, Z., Zhang, W. & Wang, J. Inception score, label smoothing, gradient vanishing and -log(D(x)) alternative. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.01729 (2017). · arXiv
- Tinbergen, N. On aims and methods of ethology. Ethology 20, 410–433 (1963).
- Das, R., Hanson, J. E., Kephart, J. O. & Tesauro, G. Agent–human interactions in the continuous double auction. In Proc. 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 1169–1178 (Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001).
- Smilkov, D., Thorat, N., Kim, B., Viégas, F. & Wattenberg, M. SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noise. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03825 (2017). · arXiv
- Edwards, H. & Storkey, A. Censoring representations with an adversary. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.05897 (2015). · arXiv
- Zemel, R., Wu, Y., Swersky, K., Pitassi, T. & Dwork, C. learning fair representations. In Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning 325–333 (2013).
- Leibo, J. Z. et al. Psychlab: a psychology laboratory for deep reinforcement learning agents. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.08116 (2018). In this study, the authors use behavioural tools from the life sciences in the study of machine behaviours. · arXiv
- Lazaridou, A., Peysakhovich, A. & Baroni, M. Multi-agent cooperation and the emergence of (natural) language. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.07182 (2016). · arXiv
- Kamar, E., Hacker, S. & Horvitz, E. Combining human and machine intelligence in large-scale crowdsourcing. in Proc. 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems 467–474 (International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2012).
- Wang, D., Khosla, A., Gargeya, R., Irshad, H. & Beck, A. H. Deep learning for identifying metastatic breast cancer. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05718 (2016). · arXiv
- Pentland, A. Social Physics: How Social Networks Can Make Us Smarter (Penguin, 2015).
- Meyer, M. N. Two cheers for corporate experimentation: The A/B illusion and the virtues of data-driven innovation. Colorado Technol. Law J. 13, 273 (2015).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research
Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0057 · Cited by 2,921
“The interactional properties of AI make it capable of learning and changing its behavior based on the cues from the environment (Frantz, 2003; Rahwan et al., 2019).”
BackgroundHow artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing
Davenport, T., Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Bressgott, T. (2020) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00696-0 · Cited by 2,875
Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0072 · Cited by 2,755
Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Hwang, G.-J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001 · Cited by 1,435
“Topics related to human-arti fi cial congition such as machine behavior (Rahwan et al., 2019), cognitive of fl oading (Risko & Gilbert, 2016), and new de fi nitions of cognition (Bayne et al., 2019) are particularly relevat to study as the role of AI in education is growing in signi fi cance.”
BackgroundZheng, Y. H., Yao, Y., Ou, J., Li, M., Luo, D., Dou, H., Li, Z., Amine, K., Yu, A., & Chen, Z. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00305k · Cited by 1,047
Metadata
- Authors
- Rahwan, I., Cebrian, M., Obradovich, N., Bongard, J., Bonnefon, J.-F., Breazeal, C., Crandall, J. W., Christakis, N. A., Couzin, I. D., Jackson, M. O., Jennings, N. R., Kamar, E., Kloumann, I. M., Larochelle, H., Lazer, D., McElreath, R., Mislove, A., Parkes, D. C., Pentland, A. ‘., Roberts, M. E., Shariff, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Wellman, M.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
- MIT Media Lab (US)
- University of Vermont (US)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Brigham Young University (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Meta (United States) (US)
- Northeastern University (US)
- Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
- Harvard University (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rahwan, Iyad
- ORCID
- Rahwan, Iyad
- Obradovich, Nick
- Bongard, Josh
- Bonnefon, Jean-François
- Breazeal, Cynthia
- Crandall, Jacob W.
- Christakis, Nicholas A.
- Couzin, Iain D.
- Jackson, Matthew O.
- Jennings, Nicholas R.
- Lazer, David
- McElreath, Richard
- Mislove, Alan
- Parkes, David C.
- Pentland, Alex ‘Sandy’
- Roberts, Margaret E.
- Shariff, Azim
- Tenenbaum, Joshua B.
- Wellman, Michael
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 568
- Issue
- 7753
- Pages
- 477-486
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W4211017739
- Cited by
- 1,364
- References
- 115
- Citations by year
- 2026: 330 · 2025: 258 · 2024: 187 · 2023: 157 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 143 · 2020: 113 · 2019: 31
- FWCI
- 29.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Toulouse 1 Capitole Publications (Université Toulouse I Capitole) (submittedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (N00014-14-1-0635, 1355061, 1447634, N00014-09-1-1074, 1231216, 1344227)
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- Office of the Director of National Intelligence (2017-17061500006)
- Future of Life Institute
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (422037984)
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-EURE-0010, 2017-)
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (W911NG-11-1-0385, N00014-09-1-1074, IOS-1355061, N00014-14-1-0635)
- Companhia Brasileira de Metalurgia e Mineração (CCF-1231216)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (2017-17061500006)
- Office of Naval Research (N00014-09-1-1074, N00014-14-1 0635, IOS-1355061, W911NG-11-1-0385, N00014)
- NIH Office of the Director
- Army Research Office (W911NF-14-1-0431, W911NF-16-1-0304, N00014-14-1-0635, W911NG-11-1- 0385, IOS-1355061, W911NF-16-1-, W911NF, N00014-09-1-1074)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence systems, AI regulation, interdisciplinary research agenda, institutional constraints, societal impact of AI
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Motivation, Robotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
