Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,413

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantifying inactive lithium in lithium metal batteries

Open access
Fang, Chengcheng, Li, Jinxing, Zhang, Minghao, Zhang, Yihui, Yang, Fan, Lee, Jungwoo Z., Lee, Min-Han, Alvarado, Judith, Schroeder, Marshall A., Yang, Yangyuchen, Lu, Bingyu, Williams, Nicholas, Ceja, Miguel, Yang, Li, Cai, Mei, Gu, Jing, Xu, Kang, Wang, Xuefeng, Meng, Ying Shirley·2019·Nature

Abstract

Lithium metal anodes offer high theoretical capacities (3,860 milliampere-hours per gram)1, but rechargeable batteries built with such anodes suffer from dendrite growth and low Coulombic efficiency (the ratio of charge output to charge input), preventing their commercial adoption2,3. The formation of inactive (‘dead’) lithium— which consists of both (electro)chemically formed Li+ compounds in the solid electrolyte interphase and electrically isolated unreacted metallic Li0 (refs 4,5)—causes capacity loss and safety hazards. Quantitatively distinguishing between Li+ in components of the solid electrolyte interphase and unreacted metallic Li0 has not been possible, owing to the lack of effective diagnostic tools. Optical microscopy6, in situ environmental transmission electron microscopy7,8, X-ray microtomography9 and magnetic resonance imaging10 provide a morphological perspective with little chemical information. Nuclear magnetic resonance11, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy12 and cryogenic transmission electron microscopy13,14 can distinguish between Li+ in the solid electrolyte interphase and metallic Li0, but their detection ranges are limited to surfaces or local regions. Here we establish the analytical method of titration gas chromatography to quantify the contribution of unreacted metallic Li0 to the total amount of inactive lithium. We identify the unreacted metallic Li0, not the (electro)chemically formed Li+ in the solid electrolyte interphase, as the dominant source of inactive lithium and capacity loss. By coupling the unreacted metallic Li0 content to observations of its local microstructure and nanostructure by cryogenic electron microscopy (both scanning and transmission), we also establish the formation mechanism of inactive lithium in different types of electrolytes and determine the underlying cause of low Coulombic efficiency in plating and stripping (the charge and discharge processes, respectively, in a full cell) of lithium metal anodes. We propose strategies for making lithium plating and stripping more efficient so that lithium metal anodes can be used for next-generation high-energy batteries. Titration gas chromatography is developed as an analytical method of distinguishing between lithium metal and lithium compounds within a cycled battery and assessing the amount of unreacted metallic lithium available.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-019-1481-z

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 1,413

Metadata

Authors
Fang, C., Li, J., Zhang, M., Zhang, Y., Yang, F., Lee, J. Z., Lee, M.-H., Alvarado, J., Schroeder, M. A., Yang, Y., Lu, B., Williams, N., Ceja, M., Yang, L., Cai, M., Gu, J., Xu, K., Wang, X., & Meng, Y. S.
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-08-21
Volume
572
Issue
7770
Pages
511-515
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2899054965
Cited by
1,413
References
4
FWCI
53.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying inactive lithium in lithium metal batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-019-1481-z
The paper
Fang, C., Li, J., Zhang, M., Zhang, Y., Yang, F., Lee, J. Z., Lee, M.-H., Alvarado, J., Schroeder, M. A., Yang, Y., Lu, B., Williams, N., Ceja, M., Yang, L., Cai, M., Gu, J., Xu, K., Wang, X., & Meng, Y. S. (2019). Quantifying inactive lithium in lithium metal batteries. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1481-z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.