Cited by 687Advanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesAdvancements in Battery MaterialsAdvanced battery technologies research

Review of Emerging Concepts in SEI Analysis and Artificial SEI Membranes for Lithium, Sodium, and Potassium Metal Battery Anodes

Open access
Liu, Wei, Liu, Pengcheng, Mitlin, David·2020·Advanced Energy Materials

Abstract

Anodes for lithium metal batteries, sodium metal batteries, and potassium metal batteries are susceptible to failure due to dendrite growth. This review details the structure–chemistry–performance relations in membranes that stabilize the anodes’ solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), allowing for stable electrochemical plating/stripping. Case studies involving Li, Na, and K are presented to illustrate key concepts. “Classical” versus “modern” understandings of the SEI are described, with an emphasis on the new structural insights obtained through novel analytical techniques, including in situ liquid‐secondary ion mass spectroscopy, titration gas chromatography, and tip‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy. This Review highlights diverse approaches for increasing SEI stability, either by inserting a secondary layer between the native SEI and the separator, or by combining the membrane with a native SEI to form a hybrid composite. Exciting and nonintuitive findings are discussed, such as that the metal anode roughness profoundly affects the SEI structure and stability, or that organic artificial SEI‐layers may be more effective than the native inorganic–organic SEIs. Emerging multifunctional architectures are presented, which serve a dual role as metal hosts and metal surface protection layers. Throughout the Review, fruitful future research directions and the critical areas where there is incomplete understanding are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aenm.202002297

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traditional SOH estimation methods based on electrochemical/physical models face limitations in practical applications due to complexity of aging and individual variability.

    “These models can accurately simulate the internal behavior of batteries, but due to the complexity of battery aging processes and individual variability, they face many limitations in practical applications.24,25,26,27”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, W., Liu, P., & Mitlin, D.
Affiliations
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • Texas Materials Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Wei
  • Mitlin, David
Venue
Advanced Energy Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-10-07
Volume
10
Issue
43
ISSN
  • 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-6840
OpenAlex
W3092103797
Cited by
687
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 156 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 6
FWCI
27.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Advanced Energy Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51702223)
  • National Science Foundation
  • Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (1911905)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced battery technologies research
Keywords
solid electrolyte interphase, lithium metal anode, sodium metal anode, potassium metal anode, dendrite suppression, tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, protective layer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review