Design principles of cell-state-specific enhancers in hematopoiesis
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
During cellular differentiation, enhancers transform overlapping gradients of transcription factors (TFs) to highly specific gene expression patterns. However, the vast complexity of regulatory DNA impedes the identification of the underlying cis-regulatory rules. Here, we characterized 64,400 fully synthetic DNA sequences to bottom-up dissect design principles of cell-state-specific enhancers in the context of the differentiation of blood stem cells to seven myeloid lineages. Focusing on binding sites for 38 TFs and their pairwise interactions, we found that identical sites displayed both repressive and activating function as a consequence of cell state, site combinatorics, or simply predicted occupancy of a TF on an enhancer. Surprisingly, combinations of activating sites frequently neutralized one another or gained repressive function. These negative synergies convert quantitative imbalances in TF expression into binary activity patterns. We exploit this principle to automatically create enhancers with specificity to user-defined combinations of hematopoietic progenitor cell states from scratch.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper uses 64,400 fully synthetic DNA sequences and a lentiviral MPRA to dissect how transcription factor binding sites encode cell-state-specific enhancer activity during blood stem cell differentiation. It identifies negative synergies between TF motifs, including activator pairs that become repressors, as a design principle that converts overlapping TF gradients into binary, cell-state-specific expression and enables automated enhancer design.
Key findings
- Across seven murine hematopoietic progenitor cell states, single-factor motifs were classified as 3/38 inactive, 20/38 activators, and 10/38 repressors; Myc, Gata1/Tal1, Gata2, Creb1, and Nr2c2 showed cell-state-dependent duality, and seven factors showed non-monotonous, occupancy-dependent duality.
- Pairs of activating motifs frequently neutralized one another or became repressive: Fli1-Spi1 and Gata2-Cebpa individually showed little repression but together elicited strong repression in some cell states; 8/11 duality-associated interactions were significantly affected by spacing and/or orientation, versus 11/34 other motif pairs.
- The authors trained models on pairwise motif interactions and performed 64 automated design tasks for activation/inactivity across six cell states; the best strategy, model-guided motif placement followed by local search, produced desired activity in 75% of cases and desired inactivity in 64% of cases (F1 for activity: 0.73).
- In K562 leukemia cells, repressive function was frequently lost: 15/20 HPC activators were also activators in K562, but repressor agreement was poor, and many motif combinations that were neutralizing in primary HPCs drove transcription in K562.
Methods
- Synthetic enhancer libraries A–H were cloned upstream of a minimal promoter in a lentiviral MPRA vector; primary mouse Lin−Kit+ HSPCs were infected and differentiated for four days, then FACS-sorted into seven progenitor cell states, with additional screens in K562 cells.
- Libraries A–C tested single TF motifs and pairwise TF motif combinations for 38–42 TFs, varying motif affinity, number, spacing, orientation, and arrangement on random DNA backgrounds; 445,220 HPC and 100,923 K562 measurements passed quality filters.
- Analyses included random-DNA-based activation/repression thresholds, random forests, shape-constrained additive models, a deep convolutional model, biophysical modeling of polymerase-cycle regulation, AlphaFold3/Chai-1 structural prediction, and model-guided sequence design.
Limitations
- Stated by the paper: models remain limited to the role of 38 TFs; the approach is limited to correlative analyses across seven cell states; 3D chromatin context effects were removed by averaging across lentiviral integration sites.
- Stated by the paper: activity measurements were available for only seven cell states, impeding more quantitative analysis of correlations between several TFs’ expression and activity; the assay was more powered to detect activation than repression because of the low baseline activity of random DNA.
- Evident from the text: the K562 comparison is a leukemia cell line context, and the authors suggest its permissive epigenetic environment may explain the loss of repressive interactions, so those findings may not generalize to primary cells.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
57 of 64 cited sources checked · 27 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Altered ratios between TFs can be sufficient to establish specific gene expression programs.
“Indeed, altered ratios between TFs can be sufficient to establish specific gene expression programs.9,10”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [9] Dahl R. Walsh J.C. Lancki D. Laslo P. Iyer S.R. Singh H. Simon M.C. Regulation of macrophage and neutrophil cell fates by the PU.1:C/EBPα ratio and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor Nat. Immunol. 4 2003 1029 1036 10.1038/ni973 12958595 source
- cites [10] Hosokawa H. Ungerbäck J. Wang X. Matsumoto M. Nakayama K.I. Cohen S.M. Tanaka T. Rothenberg E.V. Transcription Factor PU.1 Represses and Activates Gene Expression in Early T Cells by Redirecting Partner Transcription Factor Binding Immunity 48 2018 1119 1134.e7 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.024 29924977 PMC6063530 source
- Premisecitation
Overlapping TF gradients accompany cellular differentiation in systems including exit from pluripotency, organogenesis, and tissue regeneration by adult stem cells.
“Similar overlapping TF gradients accompany cellular differentiation in systems ranging from the exit from pluripotency5 over organogenesis6 to tissue regeneration by other adult stem cells.7,8”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim4 of 4 sources checked- cites [5] Loh K.M. Lim B. A precarious balance: Pluripotency factors as lineage specifiers Cell Stem Cell 8 2011 363 369 10.1016/j.stem.2011.03.013 21474100 source
The paper’s discussion of pluripotency-factor expression (indexed as Abstract; page unavailable) reports variation in Oct4 and Sox2 levels among embryonic stem cells and cites findings that changes in their levels can elicit differentiation. It proposes that competing factors influence lineage choice, but does not establish that overlapping TF gradients accompany exit from pluripotency. Citation 5 is attached to that part of the citing sentence, not to its separate claims about organogenesis or adult stem cells. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [6] Pijuan-Sala B. Griffiths J.A. Guibentif C. Hiscock T.W. Jawaid W. Calero-Nieto F.J. Mulas C. Ibarra-Soria X. Tyser R.C.V. Ho D.L.L. A single-cell molecular map of mouse gastrulation and early organogenesis Nature 566 2019 490 495 10.1038/s41586-019-0933-9 30787436 PMC6522369 source
Citation 6 attaches to organogenesis, not to the separately cited claims about exit from pluripotency or adult stem cells. In “Mapping endoderm development” (page unavailable), the paper reports transcription factors with sequential activation profiles during hindgut maturation and specification. This supports changing TF expression during early organogenesis, but the passage does not establish the claimed overlapping TF gradients. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [7] Cockburn K. Annusver K. Gonzalez D.G. Ganesan S. May D.P. Mesa K.R. Kawaguchi K. Kasper M. Greco V. Gradual differentiation uncoupled from cell cycle exit generates heterogeneity in the epidermal stem cell layer Nat. Cell Biol. 24 2022 1692 1700 10.1038/s41556-022-01021-8 36357619 PMC9729105 source
- cites [8] Dulken B.W. Leeman D.S. Boutet S.C. Hebestreit K. Brunet A. Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis Defines Heterogeneity and Transcriptional Dynamics in the Adult Neural Stem Cell Lineage Cell Rep. 18 2017 777 790 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.060 28099854 PMC5269583 source
- Premisecitation
Genome-wide datasets of TF binding and chromatin accessibility are not informative regarding the functional role of each TF in a given sequence context.
“Genome-wide datasets of TF binding and chromatin accessibility13,22,23 are not informative regarding the functional role of each TF in a given sequence context.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [13] Wilson N.K. Foster S.D. Wang X. Knezevic K. Schütte J. Kaimakis P. Chilarska P.M. Kinston S. Ouwehand W.H. Dzierzak E. Combinatorial Transcriptional Control In Blood Stem/Progenitor Cells: Genome-wide Analysis of Ten Major Transcriptional Regulators Cell Stem Cell 7 2010 532 544 10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.016 20887958 source
- cites [22] Subramanian S. Thoms J.A.I. Huang Y. Cornejo-Páramo P. Koch F.C. Jacquelin S. Shen S. Song E. Joshi S. Brownlee C. Genome-wide transcription factor-binding maps reveal cell-specific changes in the regulatory architecture of human HSPCs Blood 142 2023 1448 1462 10.1182/blood.2023021120 37595278 PMC10651876 source
- cites [23] Corces M.R. Buenrostro J.D. Wu B. Greenside P.G. Chan S.M. Koenig J.L. Snyder M.P. Pritchard J.K. Kundaje A. Greenleaf W.J. Lineage-specific and single-cell chromatin accessibility charts human hematopoiesis and leukemia evolution Nat. Genet. 48 2016 1193 1203 10.1038/ng.3646 27526324 PMC5042844 source
The Results section ('Regulatory networks of normal hematopoiesis') says a motif sequence alone cannot identify the precise TF causing accessibility, especially when TFs share similar motifs. That supports a limitation of accessibility data, but not the broader claim that genome-wide TF-binding and accessibility datasets are uninformative about each TF’s functional role in a given sequence context. The paper also uses accessibility data, integrated with RNA-seq, to identify putative regulators. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationreasoning
Specific protein-protein interactions between these TFs or their co-factors may play a role in the switch from activators to repressors.
“While the capability of these models to predict structures from intrinsically disordered regions is limited,50 together with our functional data on spacing dependency, these results suggest that specific protein-protein interactions between these TFs or their co-factors may play a role in the switch from activators to repressors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Abramson J. Adler J. Dunger J. Evans R. Green T. Pritzel A. Ronneberger O. Willmore L. Ballard A.J. Bambrick J. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3 Nature 630 2024 493 500 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w 38718835 PMC11168924 source
- Interpretationcitation
Structural modeling of Fli1-Spi1 and Cebpa-Gata2 interactions suggested that steric hindrance cannot explain these effects.
“Structural modeling50,51 of the Fli1-Spi1 and Cebpa-Gata2 interactions suggested that steric hinderance cannot explain these effects (Figures 4F and S3H–S3K; see STAR Methods, section structural prediction of TF-TF-DNA complexes).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [50] Abramson J. Adler J. Dunger J. Evans R. Green T. Pritzel A. Ronneberger O. Willmore L. Ballard A.J. Bambrick J. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3 Nature 630 2024 493 500 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w 38718835 PMC11168924 source
- cites [51] Chai Discovery Boitreaud J. Dent J. McPartlon M. Meier J. Reis V. Rogozhnikov A. Wu K. Chai-1: Decoding the molecular interactions of life Preprint at bioRxiv 2024 10.1101/2024.10.10.615955 source
- Premisecitation
Experimental manipulations of TF levels or mutagenesis of natural enhancers demonstrate that single TFs cause non-trivial increases and decreases of the activity of TF-bound enhancers.
“Experimental manipulations of TF levels24,25,26 or mutagenesis of natural enhancers27 demonstrate that single TFs cause non-trivial increases and decreases of the activity of TF-bound enhancers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 4 sources checked- cites [24] Naqvi S. Kim S. Tabatabaee S. Pampari A. Kundaje A. Pritchard J.K. Wysocka J. Transfer learning reveals sequence determinants of the quantitative response to transcription factor dosage Cell Genomics 5 2025 100780 10.1016/j.xgen.2025.100780 PMC11960506 40020686 source
- cites [25] Rubin A.J. Parker K.R. Satpathy A.T. Qi Y. Wu B. Ong A.J. Mumbach M.R. Ji A.L. Kim D.S. Cho S.W. Coupled Single-Cell CRISPR Screening and Epigenomic Profiling Reveals Causal Gene Regulatory Networks Cell 176 2019 361 376.e17 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.022 30580963 PMC6329648 source
In Results, ‘Perturb-ATAC screen for TF control of cellular differentiation trajectories’ (page unavailable), ZNF750 disruption decreases accessibility at one ZNF750-bound enhancer and increases it at other ZNF750 binding sites. The Introduction describes ATAC-seq as measuring regulatory-element activity, but the Results do not establish that the sites gaining accessibility are enhancers; that part of the claim is less directly supported. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [26] Domingo J. Minaeva M. Morris J.A. Ghatan S. Ziosi M. Sanjana N.E. Lappalainen T. Non-linear transcriptional responses to gradual modulation of transcription factor dosage Preprint at bioRxiv 2024 10.1101/2024.03.01.582837 PMC12803512 41532405 source
The Results section, ‘Trans responses of transcription factor dosage modulation’ (page unavailable), reports that manipulating TF dosage produced substantial increases and decreases in downstream gene expression. It does not establish that these changes were increases or decreases in the activity of TF-bound enhancers; gene expression is the measured outcome. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [27] White M.A. Kwasnieski J.C. Myers C.A. Shen S.Q. Corbo J.C. Cohen B.A. A Simple Grammar Defines Activating and Repressing cis-Regulatory Elements in Photoreceptors Cell Rep. 17 2016 1247 1254 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.066 27783940 PMC5123866 source
- Interpretationcitation
For Fli1-Spi1, structural models suggest that Fli1 binds an activation domain of Spi1.
“In the case of Fli1-Spi1, these models rather suggest that Fli1 binds an activation domain49 of Spi1 (Figures 4F, S3H, and S3I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] DelRosso N. Tycko J. Suzuki P. Andrews C. Aradhana M. Mukund A. Liongson I. Ludwig C. Spees K. Fordyce P. Large-scale mapping and mutagenesis of human transcriptional effector domains Nature 616 2023 365 372 10.1038/s41586-023-05906-y 37020022 PMC10484233 source
The citation is attached to “activation domain” of Spi1; the structural-model inference appears to be the citing authors’ own. The source’s Activation domain sequence characteristics section discusses activation domains in other proteins, but searches for SPI1, FLI1, and PU.1 found no passage identifying an activation domain of Spi1. Our copy therefore cannot verify the part attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
These observations can quantitatively be explained by a biophysical model where a TF activates a rate-limiting step in transcriptional activation and represses other steps, such that a second step becomes rate limiting once a certain TF occupancy is exceeded.
“These observations can quantitatively be explained by a biophysical model46 where a TF activates a rate-limiting step in transcriptional activation and represses other steps, such that a second step becomes rate limiting once a certain TF occupancy is exceeded (Figures 3H and 3I; see STAR Methods, section biophysical models).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Martinez-Corral R. Friedrich D. Frömel R. Velten L. Gunawardena J. DePace A.H. Emergence of activation or repression in transcriptional control under a fixed molecular context Preprint at bioRxiv 2024 10.1101/2024.05.29.596388 PMC12501156 40982681 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
TF-MoDISCO analysis identified several motifs in background DNA that individually explained up to 9% in the variance of activities, including motifs resembling Cebpa, Gata1/2, and Spi1/Fli1 binding sites.
“Transcription Factor Motif Discovery from Importance Scores (TF-MoDISCO)48 analysis identified several motifs in background DNA that individually explained up to 9% in the variance of activities, including motifs resembling Cebpa, Gata1/2, and Spi1/Fli1 binding sites (Figures S4F and S4G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Shrikumar A. Tian K. Avsec Ž. Shcherbina A. Banerjee A. Sharmin M. Nair S. Kundaje A. Technical Note on Transcription Factor Motif Discovery from Importance Scores (TF-MoDISco) version 0.5.6.5 Preprint at arXiv 2020 10.48550/arXiv.1811.00416 source
- Premisecitation
Advanced primary cell models of hematopoietic differentiation allow measuring the activity of a large number of synthetic DNA constructs in a complex model of stemness and differentiation.
“Advanced primary cell models of hematopoietic differentiation37,38,39 provide a unique opportunity to study this broadly relevant question, as they allow for measuring the activity of a large number of synthetic DNA constructs in a complex model of stemness and differentiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [37] Weinreb C. Rodriguez-Fraticelli A.E. Camargo F.D. Klein A.M. Lineage tracing on transcriptional landscapes links state to fate during differentiation Science 367 2020 eaaw3381 10.1126/science.aaw3381 PMC7608074 31974159 source
- cites [38] Wilkinson A.C. Ishida R. Kikuchi M. Sudo K. Morita M. Crisostomo R.V. Yamamoto R. Loh K.M. Nakamura Y. Watanabe M. Long-term ex vivo haematopoietic-stem-cell expansion allows nonconditioned transplantation Nature 571 2019 117 121 10.1038/s41586-019-1244-x 31142833 PMC7006049 source
The Extended Data section describes primary HSC cultures in which stem-cell growth and multilineage activity were measured, supporting the citation as an example of a hematopoietic stem-cell model. The paper does not show that this model measures the activity of large numbers of synthetic DNA constructs; its reported readouts are cell growth, flow cytometry and transplantation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [39] Jindal K. Adil M.T. Yamaguchi N. Yang X. Wang H.C. Kamimoto K. Rivera-Gonzalez G.C. Morris S.A. Single-cell lineage capture across genomic modalities with CellTag-multi reveals fate-specific gene regulatory changes Nat. Biotechnol. 42 2024 946 959 10.1038/s41587-023-01931-4 37749269 PMC11180607 source
The 'Benchmarking CellTag-multi using in vitro hematopoiesis' section describes a primary mouse bone-marrow cell model of multilineage differentiation. The paper measures gene expression and chromatin accessibility in that model, but the cited passages do not establish measurement of the activity of large numbers of synthetic DNA constructs. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The bottom-up synthetic approach can provide data of sufficient statistical power to characterize combinatorial action of TFBSs, as demonstrated by recent studies that have profiled tens of thousands to millions of synthetic or even random DNA sequences in cell lines or yeast.
“and it can provide data of sufficient statistical power to characterize combinatorial action of TFBSs, as demonstrated by recent studies that have profiled tens of thousands to millions of synthetic or even random DNA sequences in cell lines or yeast.33,35,36”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [33] Georgakopoulos-Soares I. Deng C. Agarwal V. Chan C.S.Y. Zhao J. Inoue F. Ahituv N. Transcription factor binding site orientation and order are major drivers of gene regulatory activity Nat. Commun. 14 2023 2333 10.1038/s41467-023-37960-5 PMC10122648 37087538 source
- cites [35] de Boer C.G. Vaishnav E.D. Sadeh R. Abeyta E.L. Friedman N. Regev A. Deciphering eukaryotic gene-regulatory logic with 100 million random promoters Nat. Biotechnol. 38 2020 56 65 10.1038/s41587-019-0315-8 31792407 PMC6954276 source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [36] Sahu B. Hartonen T. Pihlajamaa P. Wei B. Dave K. Zhu F. Kaasinen E. Lidschreiber K. Lidschreiber M. Daub C.O. Sequence determinants of human gene regulatory elements Nat. Genet. 54 2022 283 294 10.1038/s41588-021-01009-4 35190730 PMC8920891 source
- Premisecitation
Measuring enhancer activity of synthetic, systematically designed DNA sequences with TFBSs placed in an otherwise inert sequence context is an alternative way to study the cis-regulatory code.
“An alternative way to study the cis-regulatory code is to measure the enhancer activity of synthetic, systematically designed DNA sequences, where TF binding sites (TFBSs) are placed in an otherwise inert sequence context.27,30,31,32,33,34”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim5 of 6 sources checked- cites [27] White M.A. Kwasnieski J.C. Myers C.A. Shen S.Q. Corbo J.C. Cohen B.A. A Simple Grammar Defines Activating and Repressing cis-Regulatory Elements in Photoreceptors Cell Rep. 17 2016 1247 1254 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.066 27783940 PMC5123866 source
- cites [30] Fiore C. Cohen B.A. Interactions between pluripotency factors specify cis-regulation in embryonic stem cells Genome Res. 26 2016 778 786 10.1101/gr.200733.115 27197208 PMC4889965 source
- cites [31] Gertz J. Siggia E.D. Cohen B.A. Analysis of combinatorial cis-regulation in synthetic and genomic promoters Nature 457 2009 215 218 10.1038/nature07521 19029883 PMC2677908 source
The paper describes synthetic libraries of transcription-factor binding sites placed upstream of a basal promoter, with activity measured by YFP expression (Abstract; page unavailable). It studies promoter activity rather than explicitly measuring enhancer activity. Moreover, a spacer designed to lack known regulatory elements appeared to recruit RNA polymerase, so the copy does not establish that the surrounding sequence was inert. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [32] Sharon E. Kalma Y. Sharp A. Raveh-Sadka T. Levo M. Zeevi D. Keren L. Yakhini Z. Weinberger A. Segal E. Inferring gene regulatory logic from high-throughput measurements of thousands of systematically designed promoters Nat. Biotechnol. 30 2012 521 530 10.1038/nbt.2205 22609971 PMC3374032 source
The Results section (“Parallel expression measurements of thousands of designed promoters,” page unavailable) describes a library of synthetic promoters used to measure how designed TF-binding-site changes affect reporter expression. But the paper measures promoter expression, not enhancer activity, and its Results section on surrounding sequence shows that the sequence context can itself affect expression; it does not establish an otherwise inert context. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [33] Georgakopoulos-Soares I. Deng C. Agarwal V. Chan C.S.Y. Zhao J. Inoue F. Ahituv N. Transcription factor binding site orientation and order are major drivers of gene regulatory activity Nat. Commun. 14 2023 2333 10.1038/s41467-023-37960-5 PMC10122648 37087538 source
- cites [34] Levo M. Segal E. In pursuit of design principles of regulatory sequences Nat. Rev. Genet. 15 2014 453 468 10.1038/nrg3684 24913666 source
- Study design and conductreasoning
The spacer sequences were, to the extent reasonable and feasible, void of TF motifs for the 38 selected TFs.
“The spacer sequences are therefore, to the extent reasonable and feasible, void of TF motifs for our 38 TFs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] Grant C.E. Bailey T.L. Noble W.S. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif Bioinformatics 27 2011 1017 1018 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr064 21330290 PMC3065696 source
The Implementation section (page unavailable) describes how FIMO scans sequences for motifs, and the Example section (page unavailable) reports a CTCF search. Neither addresses the citing authors’ spacer sequences or whether they were free of motifs for 38 selected TFs. Searches for spacer design and the 38 TFs found no such passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Leukemia is frequently driven by mutations in epigenetic modifiers or signaling master regulators that lead to gross alterations of the epigenetic landscape and an epigenetic environment widely permissive of activation.
“Leukemia is frequently driven by mutations in epigenetic modifiers or signaling master regulators58 that lead to gross alterations of the epigenetic landscape59 and an epigenetic environment widely permissive of activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [58] Papaemmanuil E. Gerstung M. Bullinger L. Gaidzik V.I. Paschka P. Roberts N.D. Potter N.E. Heuser M. Thol F. Bolli N. Genomic Classification and Prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia N. Engl. J. Med. 374 2016 2209 2221 10.1056/NEJMoa1516192 27276561 PMC4979995 source
- cites [59] Assi S.A. Imperato M.R. Coleman D.J.L. Pickin A. Potluri S. Ptasinska A. Chin P.S. Blair H. Cauchy P. James S.R. Subtype-specific regulatory network rewiring in acute myeloid leukemia Nat. Genet. 51 2019 151 162 10.1038/s41588-018-0270-1 30420649 PMC6330064 source
The Abstract and Results (‘AML subtypes adopt unique chromatin landscapes’; page unavailable) link AML mutations to altered, mutation-specific chromatin accessibility and gene expression. They do not establish an epigenetic environment widely permissive of activation; the paper instead emphasizes distinct subtype-specific patterns. It also reports that the presence or absence of DNMT3A mutations did not influence chromatin accessibility levels in its analysis. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
The CITE-seq-based FACS sorting scheme stratified the differentiation cultures into seven defined cell states after four days of culture.
“Thereby, we stratified the cultures into seven defined cell states after four days of culture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] Triana S. Vonficht D. Jopp-Saile L. Raffel S. Lutz R. Leonce D. Antes M. Hernández-Malmierca P. Ordoñez-Rueda D. Ramasz B. Single-cell proteo-genomic reference maps of the hematopoietic system enable the purification and massive profiling of precisely defined cell states Nat. Immunol. 22 2021 1577 1589 10.1038/s41590-021-01059-0 34811546 PMC8642243 source
The Results section, “A data-defined gating scheme for human hematopoiesis” (page unavailable), describes a single-cell-data-derived FACS gating scheme for molecularly defined cell states. It defines 14 states, however, and does not report stratifying differentiation cultures into seven states after four days; the Methods section, “Single-cell index cell cultures” (page unavailable), describes cultures lasting 16–19 days. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
33/38 factors included in this study contained repressor domains.
“This model is also supported by the observation that 33/38 factors included in this study contained repressor domains49 and by recent data demonstrating that different co-factors of the same TF modulate different steps in a transcriptional cycle.55”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [49] DelRosso N. Tycko J. Suzuki P. Andrews C. Aradhana M. Mukund A. Liongson I. Ludwig C. Spees K. Fordyce P. Large-scale mapping and mutagenesis of human transcriptional effector domains Nature 616 2023 365 372 10.1038/s41586-023-05906-y 37020022 PMC10484233 source
The paper reports 715 repression domains across a survey of 2,047 proteins (Abstract), but our copy does not identify the 38 factors in the citing study or say that 33 of them contain repressor domains. Searches for “33/38” and “38 factors” found no passage establishing that count. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [55] Bell C.C. Balic J.J. Talarmain L. Gillespie A. Scolamiero L. Lam E.Y.N. Ang C.-S. Faulkner G.J. Gilan O. Dawson M.A. Comparative cofactor screens show the influence of transactivation domains and core promoters on the mechanisms of transcription Nat. Genet. 56 2024 1181 1192 10.1038/s41588-024-01749-z 38769457 source
The Establishing a transcription factor-based screening system section describes nine transcription factors and the activation domains used in the screens. Neither it nor the other retrieved passages reports that 33 of 38 factors contained repressor domains (searched: “33/38 factors repressor domains,” “repressor domains 38 transcription factors,” and “repressor”). (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The adapted HSPC culture conditions permit the parallel differentiation of primary mouse HSCs into red blood cells, megakaryocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, monocytes and dendritic cells.
“We adapted culture conditions37,39 that permit the parallel differentiation of primary mouse HSCs into red blood cells, megakaryocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, monocytes and dendritic cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [37] Weinreb C. Rodriguez-Fraticelli A.E. Camargo F.D. Klein A.M. Lineage tracing on transcriptional landscapes links state to fate during differentiation Science 367 2020 eaaw3381 10.1126/science.aaw3381 PMC7608074 31974159 source
In Results, “A simultaneous assay of clonal states and fates” (page not available), the paper reports culture conditions supporting broad multilineage differentiation and identifies all the listed cell types among the cultured cells. However, that in-vitro experiment began with mouse hematopoietic progenitors; the predominantly HSC population was cultured briefly and then transplanted. It therefore does not establish parallel differentiation of primary mouse HSCs into all those cell types in culture. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [39] Jindal K. Adil M.T. Yamaguchi N. Yang X. Wang H.C. Kamimoto K. Rivera-Gonzalez G.C. Morris S.A. Single-cell lineage capture across genomic modalities with CellTag-multi reveals fate-specific gene regulatory changes Nat. Biotechnol. 42 2024 946 959 10.1038/s41587-023-01931-4 37749269 PMC11180607 source
The Methods describe culturing LSK cells from adult mouse bone marrow in broad myeloid differentiation medium, and Fig. 2 identifies erythroid, megakaryocyte, neutrophil, eosinophil, basophil, monocyte and plasmacytoid dendritic-cell fates. The paper does not establish that the starting cells were purified HSCs rather than the broader LSK population, or that the erythroid cells became mature red blood cells. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Primary blood progenitors have been described to have two orders of magnitude fewer co-activator protein molecules in the nucleus, compared with co-repressors.
“By contrast, primary blood progenitors have been described to have two orders of magnitude fewer co-activator protein molecules in the nucleus, compared with co-repressors.60”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Gillespie M.A. Palii C.G. Sanchez-Taltavull D. Shannon P. Longabaugh W.J.R. Downes D.J. Sivaraman K. Espinoza H.M. Hughes J.R. Price N.D. Absolute Quantification of Transcription Factors Reveals Principles of Gene Regulation in Erythropoiesis Mol. Cell 78 2020 960 974.e11 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.03.031 32330456 PMC7344268 source
- Findingown data
For some single factors, non-monotonous relationships between binding site number/strength and activity were observed within cell states.
“For some single factors, we observed non-monotonous relationships between binding site number/strength and activity within cell states (Figure 3F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Between 42%-56% of the variance in Library A activity comes from random DNA background.
“Therefore, between 42%–56% of the variance in Library A activity comes from random DNA background.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
These rules can be exploited for the automated design of new enhancers with activity in user-defined combinations of hematopoietic progenitor states.
“and exploit them for the automated design of new enhancers with activity in user-defined combinations of hematopoietic progenitor states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
GATA motifs in the background of sequences containing Cebpa sites weakened the activity of these sequences in HPCs, suggestive of a negative synergy.
“These results were indicative of TF interactions: for example, GATA motifs in the background of sequences containing Cebpa sites weakened the activity of these sequences in HPCs, suggestive of a negative synergy (Figures S4G and S4H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Known signaling relays subject to posttranslational regulation (e.g., Stat5a) did not display positive correlations between mRNA expression of the factor and activity of sequences containing its motifs.
“Known signaling relays subject to posttranslational regulation (e.g., Stat5a) did not display positive correlations between mRNA expression of the factor and activity of sequences containing its motifs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The negative synergy principle can be exploited to automatically create enhancers with specificity to user-defined combinations of hematopoietic progenitor cell states from scratch.
“We exploit this principle to automatically create enhancers with specificity to user-defined combinations of hematopoietic progenitor cell states from scratch.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Enhancers containing binding sites of individual lineage factors (e.g., Spi1, Cebpa, Gata1, and Fli1) activate transcription.
“We found that enhancers containing binding sites of individual “lineage factors” (e.g., Spi1, Cebpa, Gata1, and Fli1) activate transcription”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Treating sequences with the same TFBS number, affinity, and spacing as design replicates, 44% of variance was explained by design.
“Since this analysis demonstrated negligible effects of motif orientation in Library A, we additionally treated sequences with the same TFBS number, affinity, and spacing as two sets of experimental “design replicates” and found 44% of variance being explained by design (Figure S4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For Cebpa-Gata2, repression was reached by the presence of both binding sites at equal numbers.
“For Cebpa-Gata2, repression was reached by the presence of both binding sites at equal numbers (Figures 4I and S5C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The gene expression landscape measured by scRNA-seq reflects functional TF activity levels.
- Findingown data
Shape-constrained additive models identified non-monotonous relationships for seven factors.
“Shape-constrained additive models identified non-monotonous relationships for seven factors (Figure 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For Creb1, Elk1, and Sp1, one or two strong binding sites resulted in activation, but more strong sites reduced activity or even resulted in (weak) repression.
“For Creb1, Elk1, and Sp1, we identified a particularly interesting relationship between design and activity: one or two strong binding sites resulted in activation, but more strong sites reduced activity or even resulted in (weak) repression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Enhancers containing both Fli1 and Spi1 binding sites were only active in Meg/Ery, neutrophil progenitors, and monocytes, where the balance of the two factors' expression was imbalanced in favor of either factor.
“By contrast, enhancers containing both binding sites were only active in Meg/Ery, neutrophil progenitors, and monocytes, where the balance of the two factors’ expression was imbalanced in favor of either factor (Figure S5D, central column).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The gene expression landscape measured by scRNA-seq reflects functional TF activity levels.
- Findingown data
A similar sensitivity of combinatorial enhancers to the ratio in TF expression was observed for Cebpa-Gata2 and for combinations of Runx1 and Meis1 with Cebpa and Gata2.
“A similar sensitivity of combinatorial enhancers to the ratio in TF expression was observed for Cebpa-Gata2 (Figure S5E) and for combinations of Runx1 and Meis1 with Cebpa and Gata2 (Figure S5F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The gene expression landscape measured by scRNA-seq reflects functional TF activity levels.
- Findingown data
In the case of Myc, cell-state-dependent duality was observed with activity only in the cell state with the lowest Myc expression.
“In the case of Myc, we observed cell-state-dependent duality with activity only in the cell state with the lowest Myc expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
These rules are relevant for the function of enhancers from the natural genome.
“We demonstrate that these rules are relevant for the function of enhancers from the natural genome”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Binding sites of several stem cell factors (e.g., Runx1, and Meis1) act as repressors but permit or support activity in specific combinations.
“Conversely, binding sites of several “stem cell factors” (e.g., Runx1, and Meis1) act as repressors but permit or support activity in specific combinations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The effect of the background sequence dominated over the design for weak activators or repressors.
“The effect of the background sequence dominated over the design for weak activators or repressors (Figure S4C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Differences between sequences of similar design but different background sequences were observed.
“Besides the effects of motif numbers and affinities, we also observed differences between sequences of similar design but different background sequences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Many pairs were repressors in some cell state and activators in others, i.e., duality was widespread in combinatorial enhancers.
“We found that many pairs were repressors in some cell state and activators in others, i.e., duality was widespread in combinatorial enhancers (Figures 2B and 4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Two pairs of motifs (Fli1-Spi1 and Gata2-Cebpa) individually displayed virtually no repressive activity but in combination elicited strong repression in some cell states.
“Surprisingly, we identified two pairs of motifs (Fli1-Spi1 and Gata2-Cebpa) that individually displayed virtually no repressive activity but in combination elicited strong repression in some cell states (Figures 4B and 4C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For Creb1, Elk1, and Sp1, several weak binding sites were needed to induce activation.
“By contrast, several weak binding sites were needed to induce activation (Figure 3G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Identical TF binding sites displayed both repressive and activating function as a consequence of cell state, site combinatorics, or predicted occupancy of a TF on an enhancer.
“we found that identical sites displayed both repressive and activating function as a consequence of cell state, site combinatorics, or simply predicted occupancy of a TF on an enhancer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Motif pairs induced binary patterns of activity, inactivity, and repression.
“By contrast, motif pairs induced binary patterns of activity, inactivity, and repression (Figure 2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Many combinations of factors activated transcription in some cell states and repressed it in others.
“In particular, many combinations of factors were able to activate transcription in some cell states and to repress it in others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Motifs for Myc, Gata1/Tal1, Gata2, Creb1, and Nr2c2 were repressive in some cell states and activating in others.
“Additionally, we found that motifs for Myc, Gata1/Tal1, Gata2, Creb1, and Nr2c2 were repressive in some cell states and activating in others (Figure 2B, bottom row).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For these factors, enhancers containing an intermediate number of motifs or motifs of intermediate affinity were maximally activating.
“For these factors, enhancers containing an intermediate number of motifs or motifs of intermediate affinity were maximally activating.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Considering repression gave a somewhat more accurate separation of lineages.
“A somewhat more accurate separation of lineages was obtained when considering repression (Figure 2C, center).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Combinations of activating sites frequently neutralized one another or gained repressive function.
“Surprisingly, combinations of activating sites frequently neutralized one another or gained repressive function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cebpa, Gata2, and Fli1 gave rise to dual enhancers in combination with one another and with Runx1/Meis1.
“Specifically, Cebpa, Gata2, and Fli1 gave rise to dual enhancers in combination with one another and with Runx1/Meis1 (Figures 4A and S3D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After accounting for measurement noise, 58% of variance in Library A was explained by the design features in a random forest model unaware of background.
“After accounting for measurement noise (see STAR Methods, section machine learning-based analyses), 58% of variance in Library A was explained by the design features in a random forest model unaware of background (Figure S4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In Library A, spacing dependency was identified for several factors that preferentially bind to DNA as multimers (e.g., Stat5a).
“In Library A, similar analyses identified spacing dependency for several factors that preferentially bind to DNA as multimers (e.g., Stat5a, Figures S3F and S3G).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
On held-out test sets, the deep model explained between 30%-56% of variance in cell-state-specific activity levels.
“On held-out test sets, the model explained between 30%–56% of variance in cell-state-specific activity levels (Figure 5F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The deep model trained on all data except Libraries G + H predominantly learns rules on pairwise motif interactions.
- Findingown data
Repressive sequences were generated with lower specificity compared with the activation task.
“We thereby generated repressive sequences, although with lower specificity, compared with the activation task (Figure S6K).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The deep model trained on all data except Libraries G + H predominantly learns rules on pairwise motif interactions.
- Findingown data
Generally, the ability of a motif combination to activate transcription was well predicted by the ability of the constituent motifs to activate transcription on their own.
“To characterize these interactions as unspecific/additive or synergistic/antagonistic, we exploited the observation that generally, the ability of a motif combination to activate transcription was well predicted by the ability of the constituent motifs to activate transcription on their own (Figures 7E, 7F, and S7G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The complex synthetic Library H was predicted similarly well as the held-out test sets (R2: 0.26).
“The complex synthetic Library H, which contained motifs for more than two TFs per sequence, was predicted similarly well as the held-out test sets (R2: 0.26, Figure 5G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The deep model trained on all data except Libraries G + H predominantly learns rules on pairwise motif interactions.
- Findingown data
Myb displayed positive synergies with several factors including Cebpa and Gata1/Tal1.
“Myb displayed positive synergies with several factors including Cebpa and Gata1/Tal1 (Figures 7E–7H).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
As a trend, tasks aiming for activity in related cell states resulted in more valid sequences.
“As a trend, tasks aiming for activity in related cell states resulted in more valid sequences (Figure 6B, middle and S6G).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The deep model trained on all data except Libraries G + H predominantly learns rules on pairwise motif interactions.
- Findingown data
The cells produced by the HSPC culture system, as well as their progenitor stages, recapitulated gene expression patterns observed in vivo.
“The cells produced by this system, as well as their progenitor stages, recapitulated gene expression patterns observed in vivo (Figures 1A,1B, S1D–S1F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The AF3 model resulted in structures where both Cebpa and Gata1/2 proteins were bound to the DNA.
“The AF3 model resulted in structures where both proteins were bound to the DNA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Performance varied by design strategy.
“Performance varied by design strategy (Figures S6I and S6J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The deep model trained on all data except Libraries G + H predominantly learns rules on pairwise motif interactions.
- Findingown data
Factors associated with occupancy-dependent duality (Elk1, Sp1, and Creb1) behaved very similarly in K562 and primary HPCs.
“Factors associated with occupancy-dependent duality (Elk1, Sp1, and Creb1) behaved very similarly in K562 and primary HPCs (Figure S7C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The gain of repressive function by enhancers that contained at least one Fli1 and one Spi1 motif was recapitulated in genomic enhancers.
“Of note, the gain of repressive function by enhancers that contained at least one Fli1 and one Spi1 motif was recapitulated in genomic enhancers (Figure 5D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cells from the same sorting gate clustered together.
“still, cells from the same sorting gate clustered together (Figure S1I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For most tasks, the automated design procedure resulted in sequences predicted to generate the desired activity pattern (valid sequences).
“For most tasks, this procedure resulted in sequences predicted to generate the desired activity pattern, which we define as “valid” sequences (Figures 6B, top and S6F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The deep model trained on all data except Libraries G + H predominantly learns rules on pairwise motif interactions.
- Findingown data
For model training, it is better to include more data points, even if these are individually of lower quality.
“The result shows that for model training, it is better to include more data points, even if these are individually of lower quality (Figure S2E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Runx1 and Meis1 elicited weak or no transcriptional activity in combination with strong activators such as Cebpa.
“By contrast, Runx1 and Meis1 elicited weak or no transcriptional activity in combination with strong activators such as Cebpa, in line with the findings from Library B.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
More mature cell states were isolated with purities of >90%.
“While more mature cell states were isolated with purities of >90%”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Performance further increased for tasks that had resulted in more valid candidates ab initio.
“Performance further increased for tasks that had resulted in more valid candidates ab initio (Figure 6B, bottom).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The deep model trained on all data except Libraries G + H predominantly learns rules on pairwise motif interactions.
- Findingown data
More combinations resulted in inactivity in HPCs, compared with K562.
“This revealed that more combinations resulted in inactivity in HPCs, compared with K562 (Figures 7A–7C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All variants of the Fli1-Spi1 model showed the interaction between the Spi1 transactivation domain and Fli1.
“All variants of the model showed the interaction between the Spi1 transactivation domain and Fli1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
These neutralizing interactions were lost in K562 cells.
“These neutralizing interactions were lost in K562 cells (Figures S7G and S7H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Model predictions were more accurate for sequences with a higher variance across cell states.
“since we observed that model predictions were more accurate for sequences with a higher variance across cell states (Figure S6E)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
These specific interactions were lost in K562.
“Again, these specific interactions were lost in K562.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The estimates of activation strength per factor combination were highly concordant between Libraries B and C (Pearson R: 0.87).
“The estimates of activation strength per factor combination were highly concordant between Libraries B and C (Figure S7E, Pearson R: 0.87).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In both libraries, the average activity of all enhancers containing a certain motif combination was correlated with the activity of the corresponding dual-factor enhancers from Library B (R = 0.79 for Library H, 0.6 for Library G).
“In both libraries, the average activity of all enhancers containing a certain motif combination (e.g., Fli1-Spi1) was correlated with the activity of the corresponding dual-factor enhancers from Library B (Figures 5B and 5C: R = 0.79 [Library H], 0.6 [Library G])”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The model can explain interesting spacing-dependent behavior for Elk1.
“Finally, it can explain interesting spacing-dependent behavior for Elk1 (Figures S3B and S3G).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These interactions serve to convert overlapping TF gradients into highly cell-state-specific, binary activity patterns.
“Together, these interactions serve to convert overlapping TF gradients into highly cell-state-specific, binary activity patterns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Repression emerges at specific ratios between activating TFs.
“This result suggests that repression emerges at specific ratios between activating TFs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The gene expression landscape measured by scRNA-seq reflects functional TF activity levels.
- Interpretationown data
Negative synergies between TF motifs enable enhancers to sense TF ratios and thereby activate gene expression in a highly cell-state-specific manner.
“Together, these data illustrate that negative synergies between TF motifs enable enhancers to sense TF ratios and thereby activate gene expression in a highly cell-state-specific manner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The gene expression landscape measured by scRNA-seq reflects functional TF activity levels.
- Interpretationreasoning
Negative synergies convert quantitative imbalances in TF expression into binary activity patterns.
“These negative synergies convert quantitative imbalances in TF expression into binary activity patterns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
A plethora of contexts in which TFs bind make it difficult to understand or predict these effects.
“but a plethora of contexts in which TFs bind make it difficult to understand or predict these effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Negative synergies between TFBSs are a design principle of cell-state-specific enhancers in hematopoiesis.
“In summary, these data highlight negative synergies between TFBSs as a design principle of cell-state-specific enhancers in hematopoiesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Some single TFs can achieve binary activity patterns on their own, by acting as an activator at low occupancy and as a repressor at high occupancy.
“Hence, some single TFs can achieve binary activity patterns on their own, by acting as an activator at low occupancy and as a repressor at high occupancy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The assay was more powered to detect activation than repression due to the relatively low baseline activity of the reporter with random DNA.
“We note that owing to the relatively low baseline activity of our reporter with random DNA, our assay was more powered to detect activation, compared with repression (Figures 2A and S2J).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
TFBSs placed in synthetic DNA are correlated with changes in the concentration of the corresponding TF.
“These analyses provide evidence that TFBSs placed in synthetic DNA are correlated with changes in the concentration of the corresponding TF.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The function of TF motifs as activators or repressors is dependent on co-occurring motifs.
“Together, these analyses demonstrate that the function of TF motifs as activators or repressors is dependent on co-occurring motifs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These analyses classify factors as activators or repressors in HPCs.
“Together, these analyses classify factors as activators or repressors in HPCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Interactions with Runx1, Meis1, or Fli1 increase the lineage specificity of Gata1/Tal1, Gata2, Cebpa, and Spi1.
“and that interactions with Runx1, Meis1, or Fli1 increase the lineage specificity of Gata1/Tal1, Gata2, Cebpa, and Spi1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
A FACS gating scheme was designed and validated to sort the cultures into seven well-defined progenitor cell states.
“We then designed and validated a fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) gating scheme to sort the cultures into seven well-defined progenitor cell states (Figures 1A and S1G–S1J; STAR Methods) and measured the activity of the MPRA constructs in these seven cell states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
The bottom-up synthetic approach keeps strong control over the sequence composition of candidate enhancers.
“This bottom-up approach keeps strong control over the sequence composition of candidate enhancers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The hematopoietic differentiation cultures recapitulate gene expression patterns observed in vivo, as confirmed by scRNA-seq and CITE-seq.
“We characterized these cultures using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing (CITE-seq), confirming that they recapitulate gene expression patterns observed in vivo (Figures 1A and S1D–S1F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The data allow comprehensive characterization of the function of binding sites and their pairwise interactions across differentiation.
“Our data allow us to comprehensively characterize the function of binding sites and their pairwise interactions across differentiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Occupancy-dependent duality enables enhancers to act as filters for a specific, not necessarily maximal or minimal, TF activity.
“This occupancy-dependent duality enables enhancers to act as filters for a specific, not necessarily maximal or minimal, TF activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The study identified three design principles of cell-state specificity.
“Here, we have constructed enhancers from scratch to identify three design principles of cell-state specificity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Motifs of a single factor can be interpreted differently in different cell states.
“Second, motifs of a single factor can be interpreted differently in different cell states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
A quantitative understanding of pairwise interactions between TF motifs can be used for the de novo design of cell-state-specific enhancers in a primary cell system.
“These results demonstrate that a quantitative understanding of pairwise interactions between TF motifs can be used for the de novo design of cell-state-specific enhancers in a primary cell system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The deep model trained on all data except Libraries G + H predominantly learns rules on pairwise motif interactions.
- Interpretationreasoning
TFs that have no apparent autonomous repressive ability can become repressors in combination.
“Here, we demonstrate that these principles can result in TFs that have no apparent autonomous repressive ability but become repressors in combination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The study was not able to dissect distance-dependent interactions of TFs because the intrinsic disordered regions of the TFs were used as a universal linker between the two proteins, irrespective of the spacer between the binding sites.
“We were not able to dissect distance-dependent interactions of TFs, as the intrinsic disordered regions of the TFs were used as a universal linker between the two proteins, irrespective of the spacer between the binding sites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This principle resulted in cell-state-specific synthetic enhancers.
“This principle resulted in cell-state-specific synthetic enhancers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The gene expression landscape measured by scRNA-seq reflects functional TF activity levels.
- Interpretationreasoning
Motifs of a single TF can act as activating or repressive, simply depending on the predicted occupancy of the TF on the enhancer.
“First, motifs of a single TF can act as activating or repressive, simply depending on the predicted occupancy of the TF on the enhancer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
For investigating the interactions of enhancer sequences with TFs and co-factors, our approach is limited to correlative analyses across seven cell states.
“Additionally, for investigating the interactions of enhancer sequences with TFs and co-factors, our approach is limited to correlative analyses across seven cell states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The purity of the FACS-sorted populations was confirmed by smart-seq2.
“The purity of the resulting FACS-sorted populations was confirmed by smart-seq269 (Figure S1I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [69] Picelli S. Björklund Å.K. Faridani O.R. Sagasser S. Winberg G. Sandberg R. Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells Nat. Methods 10 2013 1096 1098 10.1038/nmeth.2639 24056875 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Combinatorial duality is a powerful principle enabling enhancers to sense TF ratios and thereby become cell-state specific.
“Such combinatorial duality is a powerful principle enabling enhancers to sense TF ratios and thereby become cell-state specific.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Differential modulation of distinct biochemical steps in transcriptional activation is a minimal plausible mechanism of occupancy-dependent duality.
“The systematic design of our large-scale enhancer libraries, which explore a wide range of affinities and binding site numbers of TFs, allowed us to instead suggest differential modulation of distinct biochemical steps in transcriptional activation as a minimal plausible mechanism of occupancy-dependent duality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The work introduces principles and rules underlying cell-state-specific hematopoietic enhancers.
“In sum, our work introduces principles and rules underlying cell-state-specific hematopoietic enhancers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The correlation indicates a high relevance of pairwise motif interactions for more complex and natural sequences.
“indicating a high relevance of pairwise motif interactions for more complex and natural sequences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Due to the scale of MPRA screens in primary cells, our models remain limited to the role of 38 TFs.
“Due to the scale of MPRA screens in primary cells, our models remain limited to the role of 38 TFs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Many complex patterns of enhancer activity and inactivity across hematopoietic progenitor states can be achieved from interactions of the TFs from this study.
“These results suggest that many complex patterns of enhancer activity and inactivity across hematopoietic progenitor states can be achieved from interactions of the TFs from this study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The deep model trained on all data except Libraries G + H predominantly learns rules on pairwise motif interactions.
- Interpretationown data
Motifs of two different factors can interact non-additively.
“Third and most importantly, motifs of two different factors can interact non-additively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In hematopoiesis, co-expression of mutually neutralizing TFs in stem cells can ensure that lineage-associated enhancers remain repressed in stem cells and only become active in the lineage(s) where the right combination of TFs is expressed.
“In hematopoiesis, this mechanism might be crucial to ensure a mutual exclusivity of stem and progenitor programs: The co-expression of mutually neutralizing TFs in stem cells can ensure that lineage-associated enhancers remain repressed in stem cells and only become active in the lineage(s) where the right combination of TFs is expressed (Figure 7J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The repressive function of several TFs is impaired in K562 cells.
“Together, these results suggest that the repressive function of several TFs is impaired in K562 cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Measurements of pairwise interactions between TF motifs are informative of the activity and specificity of complex synthetic and genomic enhancers containing these motifs.
“In summary, measurements of pairwise interactions between TF motifs are informative of the activity and specificity of complex synthetic and genomic enhancers containing these motifs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The deep model trained on all data except Libraries G + H predominantly learns rules on pairwise motif interactions.
- Interpretationown data
This is the first demonstration that combinations of activators alone can give rise to a repressor.
“this is, to our knowledge, the first demonstration that combinations of activators alone can give rise to a repressor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 59
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 29
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn K562 cells, activators usually dominate, and repressive interactions are scarce.
“In a human leukemia cell line commonly used for MPRA studies42,43 (K562), by contrast, activators usually dominate, and repressive interactions are scarce.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [42] Agarwal V. Inoue F. Schubach M. Penzar D. Martin B.K. Dash P.M. Keukeleire P. Zhang Z. Sohota A. Zhao J. Massively parallel characterization of transcriptional regulatory elements Nature 639 2025 411 420 10.1038/s41586-024-08430-9 39814889 PMC11903340 source
- cites [43] Kheradpour P. Ernst J. Melnikov A. Rogov P. Wang L. Zhang X. Alston J. Mikkelsen T.S. Kellis M. Systematic dissection of regulatory motifs in 2000 predicted human enhancers using a massively parallel reporter assay Genome Res. 23 2013 800 811 10.1101/gr.144899.112 23512712 PMC3638136 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn some cases, activity of enhancers with Gfi1 sites was correlated with expression of Gfi1b, with weak evidence for stronger correlations with other factors from the same motif family.
“In some cases, we found statistically weak evidence for stronger correlations with other factors from the same motif family,45 e.g., the activity of enhancers with Gfi1 sites was correlated with the expression of Gfi1b (Figure S3C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Vierstra J. Lazar J. Sandstrom R. Halow J. Lee K. Bates D. Diegel M. Dunn D. Neri F. Haugen E. Global reference mapping of human transcription factor footprints Nature 583 2020 729 736 10.1038/s41586-020-2528-x 32728250 PMC7410829 source
The ‘Assigning TFs to footprints’ and ‘Cell-selective TF occupancy landscapes’ sections (page not available) say that closely related transcription factors can share recognition sequences, supporting the same-motif-family premise. They do not report enhancer-activity correlations with factor expression or evidence that those correlations are stronger for other family members. The Gfi1/Gfi1b example is presented as the citing authors’ own finding, with a citation to their Figure S3C. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRunx1, Meis1, Gata1/Tal1, Gata2, and Lyl1 are part of a heptad of TFs with frequent co-binding to stem cell enhancers, and Gata1/Tal1, Spi1, Fli1, and Cebpa are master regulators of lineage differentiation.
“Runx1, Meis1, Gata1/Tal1, Gata2, and Lyl1 are part of a heptad of TFs with frequent co-binding to stem cell enhancers,13 and Gata1/Tal1, Spi1, Fli1, and Cebpa are master regulators of lineage differentiation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Wilson N.K. Foster S.D. Wang X. Knezevic K. Schütte J. Kaimakis P. Chilarska P.M. Kinston S. Ouwehand W.H. Dzierzak E. Combinatorial Transcriptional Control In Blood Stem/Progenitor Cells: Genome-wide Analysis of Ten Major Transcriptional Regulators Cell Stem Cell 7 2010 532 544 10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.016 20887958 source
The Results identify a seven-factor group that frequently binds together in blood stem/progenitor cells: SCL/TAL1, LYL1, LMO2, GATA2, RUNX1, ERG, and FLI-1. MEIS1 and GATA1 are not members of that heptad. The citation is attached to the heptad claim, not the subsequent lineage-differentiation claim. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationUnder common biophysical assumptions, increases in motif number and affinity lead to higher TF occupancy.
“Under common biophysical assumptions, increases in these two quantities lead to higher TF occupancy.46,47”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [46] Martinez-Corral R. Friedrich D. Frömel R. Velten L. Gunawardena J. DePace A.H. Emergence of activation or repression in transcriptional control under a fixed molecular context Preprint at bioRxiv 2024 10.1101/2024.05.29.596388 PMC12501156 40982681 source
- cites [47] Barr K.A. Reinitz J. A sequence level model of an intact locus predicts the location and function of nonadditive enhancers PLoS One 12 2017 e0180861 10.1371/journal.pone.0180861 PMC5513433 28715438 source
The Results section (‘Sequence level model without enhancer competition and eve expression’; page unavailable) says the model calculates equilibrium TF occupancy from DNA sequence and binding preferences. Materials and methods (‘Parameter estimation’; page unavailable) links binding scores to relative affinity. But the passages on binding-site number discuss the computational cost of calculating occupancy, not whether adding sites raises it; our copy does not state the claimed increase in occupancy from increasing either quantity. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFactor pairs were only correlated between closely related lineages and separated lineages hierarchically according to known transcriptional and developmental relationships.
“By contrast, factor pairs were only correlated between closely related lineages and separated lineages hierarchically according to the known transcriptional and developmental relationships between them3 (Figure 2C, right).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Tusi B.K. Wolock S.L. Weinreb C. Hwang Y. Hidalgo D. Zilionis R. Waisman A. Huh J.R. Klein A.M. Socolovsky M. Population snapshots predict early haematopoietic and erythroid hierarchies Nature 555 2018 54 60 10.1038/nature25741 29466336 PMC5899604 source
The Results section (‘The transcriptional state continuum of HPCs is hierarchical, but not a strict tree’; page not provided) describes correlated pairs of terminal fates used to construct a haematopoietic hierarchy, including specific related fate groups. It does not report that factor pairs were correlated only between closely related lineages; the correlated pairs used to build the hierarchy were fates, not factors. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe natural genome contains only few instances of many TF combinations and binding site arrangements and is statistically underpowered to learn the rules by which it is decoded.
“it has been argued that the natural genome contains only few instances of many TF combinations and binding site arrangements, and it is in a statistical sense underpowered to “learn the rules by which it is decoded.”28,29”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [28] Lambert S.A. Jolma A. Campitelli L.F. Das P.K. Yin Y. Albu M. Chen X. Taipale J. Hughes T.R. Weirauch M.T. The Human Transcription Factors Cell 172 2018 650 665 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.029 29425488 PMC12908702 source
- cites [29] De Boer C.G. Taipale J. Hold out the genome: a roadmap to solving the cis-regulatory code Nature 625 2024 41 50 10.1038/s41586-023-06661-w 38093018 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKey hematopoietic TFs are expressed in smooth, overlapping gradients throughout stem and progenitor populations, whereas their target genes display cell-state-specific expression patterns.
“single-cell transcriptomics1,2,3 and imaging-based4 studies have demonstrated that key TFs are expressed in smooth, overlapping gradients throughout the stem and progenitor populations (Figure 1A, top row); by contrast, the target genes regulated by these factors display cell-state-specific expression patterns (Figure 1A, bottom row).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [1] Paul F. Arkin Y. Giladi A. Jaitin D.A. Kenigsberg E. Keren-Shaul H. Winter D. Lara-Astiaso D. Gury M. Weiner A. Transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment in myeloid progenitors Cell 163 2015 1663 1677 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.013 26627738 source
- cites [2] Velten L. Haas S.F. Raffel S. Blaszkiewicz S. Islam S. Hennig B.P. Hirche C. Lutz C. Buss E.C. Nowak D. Human haematopoietic stem cell lineage commitment is a continuous process Nat. Cell Biol. 19 2017 271 281 10.1038/ncb3493 28319093 PMC5496982 source
The Results sections “Early haematopoiesis is a continuous process” and “Molecular processes underlying HSC commitment” describe gradual differences among primitive cells and non-exclusive expression of early lineage-priming modules. They do not establish smooth, overlapping gradients of key transcription factors throughout both stem and progenitor populations, or the claimed contrast between those factors and their target genes; the paper also describes lineage-specific transcription-factor modules in later progenitors. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [3] Tusi B.K. Wolock S.L. Weinreb C. Hwang Y. Hidalgo D. Zilionis R. Waisman A. Huh J.R. Klein A.M. Socolovsky M. Population snapshots predict early haematopoietic and erythroid hierarchies Nature 555 2018 54 60 10.1038/nature25741 29466336 PMC5899604 source
The Results section (‘The erythroid differentiation trajectory’; page unavailable) reports that Gata1 is expressed early while most of its canonical targets are induced only at the transition to ETD, supporting a difference between TF and target-gene expression timing. It does not establish that key TFs generally form smooth, overlapping gradients throughout stem and progenitor populations, or that their targets generally have cell-state-specific patterns. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [4] Wheat J.C. Sella Y. Willcockson M. Skoultchi A.I. Bergman A. Singer R.H. Steidl U. Single-molecule imaging of transcription dynamics in somatic stem cells Nature 583 2020 431 436 10.1038/s41586-020-2432-4 32581360 PMC8577313 source
The “PU.1 and Gata TF co-expression in HSPC” section reports substantial co-expression across the progenitor populations studied, and “Single molecule imaging in primary HSPC” reports different transcription of myeloid and erythroid genes in PU.1-high cells. These passages support overlapping TF expression and state-associated differences in selected genes, but do not establish smooth gradients throughout stem and progenitor populations or cell-state-specific expression patterns for target genes generally. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe study categorized hematopoietic transcription factors of Library A with generalized additive models under shape constraints.
“We further categorized the hematopoietic TFs of Library A with generalized additive models under shape constraints92 (R package scam).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] Pya N. Wood S.N. Shape constrained additive models Stat. Comput. 25 2015 543 559 10.1007/s11222-013-9448-7 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe design rules identified here are transparent insights into pairwise interactions between TF motifs.
“Unlike recent studies that used genomic data and deep learning for designing cell-type-specific enhancers in the fruit fly61,62 or in cancer cell lines,63 the design rules identified here are transparent insights into pairwise interactions between TF motifs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [61] De Almeida B.P. Schaub C. Pagani M. Secchia S. Furlong E.E.M. Stark A. Targeted design of synthetic enhancers for selected tissues in the Drosophila embryo Nature 626 2024 207 211 10.1038/s41586-023-06905-9 38086418 PMC10830412 source
- cites [62] Taskiran I.I. Spanier K.I. Dickmänken H. Kempynck N. Pančíková A. Ekşi E.C. Hulselmans G. Ismail J.N. Theunis K. Vandepoel R. Cell-type-directed design of synthetic enhancers Nature 626 2024 212 220 10.1038/s41586-023-06936-2 38086419 PMC10830415 source
- cites [63] Gosai S.J. Castro R.I. Fuentes N. Butts J.C. Mouri K. Alasoadura M. Kales S. Nguyen T.T.L. Noche R.R. Rao A.S. Machine-guided design of cell-type-targeting cis-regulatory elements Nature 634 2024 1211 1220 10.1038/s41586-024-08070-z 39443793 PMC11525185 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSuch epigenetic alterations can potentially explain the shift toward activation observed for many TF combinations in K562 cells and the co-expression of stem and progenitor genes frequently observed in leukemia.
“Such epigenetic alterations can potentially explain the shift toward activation observed for many TF combinations in K562 cells and the co-expression of stem and progenitor genes11 frequently observed in leukemia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Beneyto-Calabuig S. Merbach A.K. Kniffka J.-A. Antes M. Szu-Tu C. Rohde C. Waclawiczek A. Stelmach P. Gräßle S. Pervan P. Clonally resolved single-cell multi-omics identifies routes of cellular differentiation in acute myeloid leukemia Cell Stem Cell 30 2023 706 721.e8 10.1016/j.stem.2023.04.001 37098346 source
In “LSCs retain erythroid capacity” (page unavailable), the paper reports that leukemic C6 cells expressed HSC-associated genes in some patients and genes associated with early erythromyeloid priming. This supports the cited point that stem- and progenitor-associated expression can coexist in AML cells, but does not establish that such co-expression is frequent across leukemia generally. The citation is attached to that co-expression point, not to the proposed epigenetic explanation or the K562 result. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAll primary hematopoietic cells activate Trp53 upon lentiviral infection without affecting the differentiation of cells in the ex vivo system used here.
“all primary hematopoietic cells activate Trp53 upon lentiviral infection87 without affecting the differentiation of cells in the ex vivo system used here.37,39”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [87] Piras F. Riba M. Petrillo C. Lazarevic D. Cuccovillo I. Bartolaccini S. Stupka E. Gentner B. Cittaro D. Naldini L. Lentiviral vectors escape innate sensing but trigger p53 in human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells EMBO Mol. Med. 9 2017 1198 1211 10.15252/emmm.201707922 28667090 PMC5582409 source
The Results section (‘Lentiviral reverse-transcribed DNA triggers p53 signaling independently of integration in human HSPC’; page unavailable) reports p53 activation after lentiviral exposure in human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, not all primary hematopoietic cells. It also reports that primary CD4+ T cells and murine HSPC did not up-regulate p21, a marker used for p53 activation. The differentiation clause is attached to other citations and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [37] Weinreb C. Rodriguez-Fraticelli A.E. Camargo F.D. Klein A.M. Lineage tracing on transcriptional landscapes links state to fate during differentiation Science 367 2020 eaaw3381 10.1126/science.aaw3381 PMC7608074 31974159 source
The Results section, “A simultaneous assay of clonal states and fates” (page unavailable), describes lentivirally barcoded hematopoietic progenitors differentiating into multiple lineages in vitro. That supports differentiation after transduction, but the paper does not establish that infection had no effect on differentiation. The Trp53 assertion is attached to a different citation in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [39] Jindal K. Adil M.T. Yamaguchi N. Yang X. Wang H.C. Kamimoto K. Rivera-Gonzalez G.C. Morris S.A. Single-cell lineage capture across genomic modalities with CellTag-multi reveals fate-specific gene regulatory changes Nat. Biotechnol. 42 2024 946 959 10.1038/s41587-023-01931-4 37749269 PMC11180607 source
In “Benchmarking CellTag-multi using in vitro hematopoiesis” (page unavailable), the paper reports that CellTag-labeled mouse hematopoietic cells produced all major lineages in culture. That supports differentiation occurring after lentiviral tagging, but it does not establish that infection left differentiation unaffected relative to uninfected cells. The Trp53 assertion is attached to a different citation in the citing sentence and is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationNon-monotonous effects of a transcription factor with respect to binding site affinity can arise when gene regulation is limited at multiple steps and the transcription factor acts incoherently on those steps, promoting transcription at some steps and hindering it at others.
“In that work, we show that non-monotonous effects of a TF with respect to binding site affinity can arise when gene regulation is limited at multiple steps, and a TF acts incoherently on those steps, such that it acts on one or more steps to promote transcription, and on other steps to hinder it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Martinez-Corral R. Friedrich D. Frömel R. Velten L. Gunawardena J. DePace A.H. Emergence of activation or repression in transcriptional control under a fixed molecular context Preprint at bioRxiv 2024 10.1101/2024.05.29.596388 PMC12501156 40982681 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCombinatorial Fli1-Spi1 enhancers were repressive if sites for both factors were present at roughly equal ratio or at an excess of Fli1 sites.
“We observed that combinatorial Fli1-Spi1 enhancers were repressive if sites for both factors were present at roughly equal ratio or at an excess of Fli1 sites (Figure 4H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The gene expression landscape measured by scRNA-seq reflects functional TF activity levels.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor Fli1-Spi1, both factors were expressed over the entire landscape and activated enhancers containing either individual binding site in all cell states.
“In the case of the Fli1-Spi1, both factors were expressed over the entire landscape and activated enhancers containing either individual binding site in all cell states (Figure S5D, left and right columns).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The gene expression landscape measured by scRNA-seq reflects functional TF activity levels.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe random background DNA is not biochemically inert but does affect enhancer activity.
“This random background DNA is not biochemically inert but does affect enhancer activity, as we analyze in detail below.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAcross the seven cell states, 3/38 factor motifs were inactive, 20/38 were activators, and 10/38 were repressors.
“Across the seven cell states, 3/38 factor motifs were inactive, 20/38 were activators, and 10/38 were repressors (Figure 2B, bottom row).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSeveral cases of combinatorial duality were observed, where a combination of activators turns into a repressor, as well as neutralizing interactions between TF motifs.
“We observe several cases of combinatorial duality, where a combination of activators turns into a repressor, as well as neutralizing interactions between TF motifs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe deep learning model mostly learned rules on the placed motifs but also extracted information from the DNA background.
“This model mostly learned rules on the placed motifs but also extracted information from the DNA background (Figures S4D and S4E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAcross the seven cell states, activity levels were positively correlated with mRNA expression of the corresponding TF in the case of 14/20 activators and negatively correlated in the case of 6/10 repressors.
“Across the seven cell states, activity levels were positively correlated with mRNA expression of the corresponding TF in the case of 14/20 activators and negatively correlated in the case of 6/10 repressors (Figures 3A and 3D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCell state and spacing modulated the behavior of combinatorial Fli1-Spi1 enhancers.
“Cell state (and spacing) modulated this behavior (Figure S5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The gene expression landscape measured by scRNA-seq reflects functional TF activity levels.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSequences containing motifs for any given single factor were often generally active in most cell states or not active in any cell state.
“We thereby found that sequences containing motifs for any given single factor were often generally active in most cell states (Figure 2B, top row) or not active in any cell state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAcross libraries, 11%-22% of sequences were classified as active in any cell state and 4%-6% as repressed.
“In total, for the different libraries, 11%–22% of the sequences were thereby classified as active in any cell state, and 4%–6% were classified as repressed (Figure 2A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor 16/20 activators, more (and/or stronger) binding sites resulted in a monotonous increase in activity, whereas for 6/10 repressors, more (and/or stronger) binding sites resulted in a monotonous decrease in activity.
“We found that for 16/20 activators, more (and/or stronger) binding sites resulted in a monotonous increase in activity, whereas for 6/10 repressors, more (and/or stronger) binding sites resulted in a monotonous decrease in activity (Figures 3B, 3C, and 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe ability of single-factor motifs to activate transcription was highly correlated between all lineages and only roughly separated lineages into an erythromyeloid and a myeloid branch.
“Quantitatively, the ability of single-factor motifs to activate transcription was highly correlated between all lineages and only roughly separated lineages into an erythromyeloid and a myeloid branch (Figure 2C, left).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSpecific combinations of lineage factor binding sites are inactive or even act as repressors.
“but specific combinations of these sites are inactive or even act as repressors”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor Fli1-Spi1 and Cebpa-Gata2, repression was achieved by strong sites that were close to each other, whereas more distantly located sites were permissive of transcription.
“In the case of Fli1-Spi1 and Cebpa-Gata2, repression was achieved by strong sites that were close to each other, whereas more distantly located sites were permissive of transcription (Figures 4E and S3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data8 of 11 interactions that gave rise to duality were significantly impacted by spacing and/or orientation of the sites, whereas this was the case for only 11 of the 34 remaining motif pairs.
“we found that 8 of 11 interactions that gave rise to duality were significantly impacted by spacing and/or orientation of the sites (Figure 4D), whereas this was the case for only 11 of the 34 remaining motif pairs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSteric hindrance was not observed in the Cebpa-Gata1/2 AF3 models.
“Steric hindrance was not observed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe split Fli1-Spi1 model resulted in a pTM score of 0.49.
“The split model resulted in a pTM score of 0.49 (Figure S3I).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn HPCs, Runx1 and Meis1 motifs were repressive on their own but permissive of activity in a larger number of combinations, compared with other repressors.
“In HPCs, Runx1 and Meis1 motifs were repressive on their own but permissive of activity in a larger number of combinations, compared with other repressors (Figure S7I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFor Cebpa and Gata1/2, structural prediction outside of the DNA binding domain was poor.
“In the case of Cebpa and Gata1/2, structural prediction outside of the DNA binding domain was poor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe AF3 structural prediction had a pTM score between 0.2-0.24 for all tested Cebpa-Gata1/2 models.
“The AF3 structural prediction had a pTM score between 0.2-0.24 for all tested models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOnly the DNA-binding domains of Cebpa and Gata1/2 were modeled properly and were binding to each TFBS respectively.
“Only the DNA-binding domains of the two proteins were modeled properly and were binding to each TFBS respectively (Figures S3J and S3K).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Fli1-Spi1 model had a pTM score of 0.29 and the DNA binding domains had a high pLDDT score.
“Our model had a pTM score of 0.29 and the DNA binding domains had a high pLDDT score (Figure S3H).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataResidual immature progenitors, megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitors, eosinophil, basophil, neutrophil precursors, and early and late monocyte precursors were effectively separated by the sorting scheme.
“Residual immature progenitors, megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitors, eosinophil, basophil, neutrophil precursors, as well as early and late monocyte precursors were effectively separated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe Fli1-Spi1 models had higher confidence compared to the Cebpa-Gata2 models.
“The Fli1-Spi1 models had higher confidence compared to the Cebpa-Gata2 models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe best design strategy was model-guided placement of motifs/motif pairs, followed by a local search, which outperformed the purely deep learning-based procedure.
“The best design strategy was model-guided placement of motifs/motif pairs, followed by a local search, which outperformed the purely deep learning-based procedure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The deep model trained on all data except Libraries G + H predominantly learns rules on pairwise motif interactions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe identical set of 270 Trp53 binding site sequences included in all libraries was characterized by a broad range of activities and a high correlation across different cell types (Pearson R>0.95) and experiments (Pearson R>0.86).
“These sequences were characterized by a broad range of activities, and a high correlation across different cell types (Pearson R>0.95) and experiments (Pearson R>0.86).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe resulting sequences generated activity relative to random DNA controls, where desired, in 75% of cases and were inactive, where desired, in 64% of cases (F1 score for activity: 0.73).
“The resulting sequences generated activity relative to random DNA controls, where desired, in 75% of cases and were inactive, where desired, in 64% of cases (F1 score for activity: 0.73, Figures 6C–6E, S6I, and S6J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The deep model trained on all data except Libraries G + H predominantly learns rules on pairwise motif interactions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt the level of activators, there was good agreement between primary HPCs and K562: 15/20 activators identified in HPCs were also activators in K562 cells, and the fraction of sequences activated by each factor in the two cell types was quantitatively similar (Pearson R: 0.82).
“At the level of activators, there was good agreement between primary HPCs and K562: 15/20 activators identified in HPCs were also activators in K562 cells, and the fraction of sequences activated by each factor in the two cell types was quantitatively similar (Figures S7A, Pearson R: 0.82).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth modelers yielded similar structures, but AF3 allowed a larger input of tokens and model performance, based on pTM score, was slightly better.
“Both modelers yielded similar structures, but since AF3 allowed a larger input of tokens and model performance, based on pTM score, was slightly better, we continued with these models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataCebpa-Gata2 and Fli1-Spi1 were the factor pairs with the strongest repressive interactions.
“More precisely, we modeled the interaction of Cebpa and Gata2, as well as the interaction of Fli1 and Spi1, as these were the factor pairs with the strongest repressive interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRunx1 and Meis1 motifs activated transcription in combination with weak activators, motifs that on their own were inactive, or even repressors, indicating that they can turn from repressors into co-activators depending on co-occurring motifs.
“Interestingly, these motifs activated transcription in combination with weak activators (Meis1-Gata2 and Runx1-Myb), motifs that on their own were inactive (Meis1-Tcf3 and Meis1-Tfap2a), or even repressors (Runx1-Tcf12 combination), indicating that they can turn from repressors into co-activators depending on co-occurring motifs (Figures 7I and S7J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn HPCs, Cebpa was antagonized by several motifs, including strong activators such as Gata1/Tal1, Nfyc, and Elk1, and it was entirely inactive in combination with Mecom.
“In HPCs, Cebpa was antagonized by several motifs, including strong activators such as Gata1/Tal1, Nfyc, and Elk1, and it was entirely inactive in combination with Mecom (Figures 7E and 7G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCorrelation of predictions and measurements across cell states for each sequence separately was positive and higher for sequences with a high variance across cell states.
“We also computed the correlation of predictions and measurements across cell states for each sequence separately and observed positive correlations that were higher for sequences with a high variance across cell states (Figure S6E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The deep model trained on all data except Libraries G + H predominantly learns rules on pairwise motif interactions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCombinations of activators and repressors were usually inactive in HPCs, but they often displayed activity in K562, also when controlling for different levels of measurement noise.
“Specifically, combinations of activators and repressors were usually inactive in HPCs, but they often displayed activity in K562 (Figure 7D), also when controlling for different levels of measurement noise between primary cells and K562 (Figure S7F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter scaling adjustment, random DNA controls measured in both experiments displayed a similar mean/variance relationship and a similar dynamic range.
“After this adjustment, random DNA controls measured in both experiments displayed a similar mean/variance relationship and a similar dynamic range.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOnly Trp53 was able to activate transcription in all (except one) combinations in HPCs, whereas Elk1, Fli1, Nfyc, Klf1/Klf4, and Sp1 were always activators in K562.
“Only Trp53 was able to activate transcription in all (except one) combinations in HPCs, whereas Elk1, Fli1, Nfyc, Klf1/Klf4, and Sp1 were always activators in K562.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningShort motifs such as GATA, and low affinity motifs, did pass the spacer filters.
“However, short motifs such as GATA, and low affinity motifs, did pass our filters, see also Figures S4F–S4H.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataActivity and specificity of these sequences were driven by the placed motifs, with contributions of putative motifs introduced in the background DNA during the optimization procedure.
“Activity and specificity of these sequences were driven by the placed motifs, with contributions of putative motifs introduced in the background DNA during the optimization procedure (Figure 6F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The deep model trained on all data except Libraries G + H predominantly learns rules on pairwise motif interactions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe model's performance was to some extent limited by the technical noise of the measurements; Library E measurements were essentially noise-free (R2 between replicates: 0.97) and the model explained 71% of the variance.
“This performance was to some extent limited by the technical noise of the measurements: when we measured a small-scale Library E of 30 enhancers with similar designs as Library A + B, we obtained essentially noise-free measurements (R2 between replicates: 0.97), and the model explained 71% of the variance (Figures S6C and S6D), underscoring the quality of our model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The deep model trained on all data except Libraries G + H predominantly learns rules on pairwise motif interactions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the natural genome Library G, performance strongly depended on the number of motifs for the focus 42 TFs present and reached an R2 of >0.3 for enhancers with >8 motifs for these TFs.
“On the natural genome Library G, performance strongly depended on the number of motifs for the focus 42 TFs present and reached an R2 of >0.3 for enhancers with >8 motifs for these TFs (Figure 5G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The deep model trained on all data except Libraries G + H predominantly learns rules on pairwise motif interactions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt the level of repressors, there was little agreement between HPCs and K562; several TFs lost repressive ability in K562 cells.
“At the level of repressors, however, there was little agreement between HPCs and K562; several TFs lost repressive ability in K562 cells (Figure S7B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenMonocyte precursors generally behaved like monocytes in the cell-state activity measurements.
“all cell states except monocyte precursors, which generally behaved like monocytes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCloning was very even, leading to a 5-10 fold difference in the representation of the different GREs within the library, with one exception where the difference was larger.
“Cloning was very even, leading to a 5-10 fold difference in the representation of the different GREs within the library, with one exception, where the difference was larger (Figure S2B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataThe model can explain Myc behavior, assuming that Myc concentration is the only difference among cell states.
“Our model can explain this behavior, assuming that Myc concentration is the only difference among cell states (Figure S3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Myc concentration is the only difference among cell states.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe choice of core promoter and the measurement time point post-lentiviral integration did not exert a major effect on enhancer activity in K562 cells.
“We performed several additional screens in K562 cells to demonstrate that the choice of core promoter (Figure S2G) or the choice of the measurement time point post-lentiviral integration (Figure S2H) did not exert a major effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataEnhancers composed of binding sites for single factors mostly relay TF occupancy to a monotonous activity response, but they also describe a first type of activator-repressor duality, cell-state-dependent duality.
“They illustrate that enhancers composed of binding sites for single factors mostly relay TF occupancy to a monotonous activity response, but they also describe a first type of activator-repressor duality, cell-state-dependent duality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataEnhancers with binding site pairs can establish binary activity patterns from overlapping TF expression gradients, whereas enhancers composed of single motifs can in most cases only establish gradual differences.
“Altogether, enhancers with binding site pairs can establish binary activity patterns from overlapping TF expression gradients, whereas enhancers composed of single motifs can in most cases only establish gradual differences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe libraries were not biased toward a specific DNA context or motif instance because each candidate enhancer had a different random DNA background and all motif instances were independently sampled.
“Each candidate enhancer had a different random DNA background, and all motif instances were independently sampled. Thereby, we ensured that our libraries were not biased toward a specific DNA context or motif instance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese combinations create enhancers that are sensitive to ratios in TF expression and specific to cell states where either factor dominates.
“creating enhancers that are sensitive to ratios in TF expression and specific to cell states where either factor dominates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataCorrelations between replicate infections were 0.95-0.99 in K562s and 0.74-0.87 in HPCs.
“Correlations between replicate infections were 0.95–0.99 in K562s and 0.74–0.87 in HPCs (Figures S2E–S2J).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOccupancy-dependent duality can lead to activator-repressor duality in an unaltered cellular environment and can create enhancers that are only active at an optimal, not necessarily maximal or minimal, TF occupancy.
“This behavior, which we term “occupancy-dependent duality,” can lead to activator-repressor duality in an unaltered cellular environment and can create enhancers that are only active at an optimal, not necessarily maximal or minimal, TF occupancy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataActivity measurements were only available for seven cell states, impeding a more quantitative analysis of correlations between gene expression of several factors and activity.
“A limitation here is that activity measurements were only available for seven cell states, impeding a more quantitative analysis of correlations between gene expression of several factors and activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe study used a genetic algorithm starting from 100 different initial conditions and chose the best solution to fit the biophysical model.
“In addition, we run the algorithm starting from 100 different initial conditions and chose the best solution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenCryptic TF motifs in a fixed background sequence might have synergistic or antagonistic effects on only a subset of TFs, ultimately leading to biases.
“The reason for this is that cryptic TF motifs in a fixed background sequence might have synergistic or antagonistic effects to only a subset of TFs, ultimately leading to biases (see also Figure S4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSynthetic enhancers characterized here have a well-defined motif composition and can establish specificity from highly overlapping TF expression patterns.
“Synthetic enhancers characterized here have a well-defined motif composition and can establish specificity from highly overlapping TF expression patterns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe final parameter set was picked manually to not sacrifice replicate reproducibility.
“The final parameter set was picked manually to not sacrifice replicate reproducibility (Figure S2E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: At the complexity of barcodes used here, a single barcode is likely to reflect a single integration site.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenEffects of 3D chromatin context were removed by averaging across lentiviral integration sites.
“Effects of 3D chromatin context were removed by averaging across lentiviral integration sites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCell-state-dependent duality can emerge from occupancy-dependent duality, differences in co-factor environment, splicing, or posttranslational modifications in different cell states.
“Such cell-state-dependent duality can potentially emerge from occupancy-dependent duality, e.g., when only some cell states express a TF dose compatible with activation. However, cell-state-dependent duality can also emerge from differences in co-factor environment, splicing, or posttranslational modifications in different cell states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe performance of our models on sequence design and genome interpretation tasks highlights the importance of pairwise TF interactions in achieving regulatory specificity and illustrates the benefits of working with non-natural sequences for learning the rules of gene regulation.
“The performance of our models on sequence design and genome interpretation tasks highlights the importance of pairwise TF interactions in achieving regulatory specificity and illustrates the benefits of working with non-natural sequences for learning the rules of gene regulation.29”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] De Boer C.G. Taipale J. Hold out the genome: a roadmap to solving the cis-regulatory code Nature 625 2024 41 50 10.1038/s41586-023-06661-w 38093018 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenBefore MPRA screens, all lentivirus preparations were tested in K562 cells and HPCs to assure lentiviral efficiency, cell viability and activity of the GFP reporter.
“Before MPRA screens, all lentivirus preparations were tested in K562 cells and HPCs to assure lentiviral efficiency, cell viability and activity of the GFP reporter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIn primary HPCs, TFs frequently neutralize each other's effect, and only specific combinations of factors are permissive of expression; by contrast, in K562 cells many combinations of factors were able to drive transcription.
“Together, these analyses suggest that in primary HPCs, TFs frequently neutralize each other’s effect, and only specific combinations of factors are permissive of expression. By contrast, in K562 cells many combinations of factors were able to drive transcription.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe DNA libraries were cloned such that each GRE was associated with 100s-1000s of unique barcodes in the 5′UTR.
“We cloned the DNA libraries such that each GRE was associated with 100s-1000s of unique barcodes in the 5′UTR of the (Figure S2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe study split the entire training data into ten train-validation-test splits, trained an ensemble of ten models on each train set, and averaged their prediction on the test sets.
“For model training, we split the entire training data (Library A, B, C, F, as well as control sequences included into the various screens) into ten train-validation-test splits. On each train set, we trained an ensemble of ten models and averaged their prediction on the test sets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe study discretized measurements into active and inactive by using random DNA controls.
“For data analysis, we discretized measurements into “active” and “inactive” by using random DNA controls, as described in the section identification of active and repressed sequences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe study constructed ten-fold cross-validated random forests to characterize the regulatory grammar for Library A and B.
“To characterize the regulatory grammar for Library A and B we constructed ten-fold cross-validated random forests.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese interactions depend on local motif "grammar" and possibly involve direct or indirect protein interactions between TFs.
“These interactions depend on local motif “grammar” and possibly involve direct or indirect protein interactions between TFs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMotif interactions are frequently neutralizing in primary cells but not in a leukemia cell line.
“These global analyses suggest that motif interactions are frequently neutralizing in primary cells but not in a leukemia cell line.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a shortage of large-scale, functional datasets characterizing systematically designed enhancers during cellular differentiation.
“There is, however, a shortage of large-scale, functional datasets characterizing systematically designed enhancers during cellular differentiation.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Myc concentration is the only difference among cell states.
“assuming that Myc concentration is the only difference among cell states”
The paper relies on this without support.
The gene expression landscape measured by scRNA-seq reflects functional TF activity levels.
“To relate this functional behavior to TF expression levels, we visually superimposed cell-state-specific patterns of activation and repression (Figures S5D–S5F, arrows) on a gene expression landscape measured by scRNA-seq (Figures S5D–S5F, UMAP).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The deep model trained on all data except Libraries G + H predominantly learns rules on pairwise motif interactions.
“By nature of the training data, this model is predominantly trained to learn rules on pairwise motif interactions.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
At the complexity of barcodes used here, a single barcode is likely to reflect a single integration site.
“reflecting the assumption that at the complexity of barcodes used here, a single barcode is likely to reflect a single integration site”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Binding among the sites is independent.
“The model assumes independent binding among the sites, although binding cooperativity could be included at the expense of more free parameters.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The model assumes equilibrium binding.
“Then, we consider equilibrium binding, as described.88”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The model assumes a 3-state polymerase cycle where the transition between states 1 and 2 is reversible and the other transitions are irreversible.
“We then consider a 3-state polymerase cycle where the transition between states 1 and 2 is reversible, and the other irreversible, as in,89 so that in the absence of regulation the cycle rates are k1, km1, k2, k3 and this yields a steady-state transcription rate:”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Each rate can be non-linearly modulated by the transcription factor according to the given equation.
“We then assume each rate can be non-linearly modulated by the TF according to:”
The authors state this as an assumption.
mRNA degradation is linear.
“We finally assume linear mRNA degradation and calculate the natural logarithm of the fold change in gene expression as ln(mTF/m0)”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The effects of space on Elk1 behavior can be modeled phenomenologically through the parameter x, so that all affinities are equally affected by a given spacing.
“For the fits of the space-dependent Elk1 behavior, we modelled the effects of space phenomenologically, through x, so that all affinities would be equally affected by a given spacing. We note that this is just a proxy for space-dependent cooperativities, but avoids the parameter explosion that would involve explicitly accounting for those.88”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Library H has two reported sequence counts
MinorThe Results report 3,946 sequences in Library H, while the library-design methods report 3,964.
“Library H (Complex synthetic) contained 3,946 sequences”
“A total of 3,964 sequences were created.”
Cites
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · see citing works
Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data
Gu, Z., Eils, R., & Schlesner, M. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw313 · Cited by 10,122 · see citing works
Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification
Bray, N. L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P., & Pachter, L. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3519 · Cited by 9,723 · see citing works
Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEMPreprint
Li, H. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1303.3997 · Cited by 9,540 · see citing works
Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly con*gs with BWA-MEMPreprint
Li, H. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.963153.v1 · Cited by 5,150 · see citing works
Genomic classification and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia
Papaemmanuil, E., Gerstung, M., Bullinger, L., Gaidzik, V. I., Paschka, P., Roberts, N. D., Potter, N. E., Heuser, M., Thol, F., Bolli, N., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1516192 · Cited by 4,350 · see citing works
FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif
Grant, C. E., Bailey, T. L., & Noble, W. S. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr064 · Cited by 4,247 · see citing works
The Human Transcription Factors
Lambert, S. A., Jolma, A., Campitelli, L. F., Das, P. K., Yin, Y., Albu, M., Chen, X., Taipale, J., Hughes, T. R., & Weirauch, M. T. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.029 · Cited by 3,399 · see citing works
Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells
Picelli, S., Björklund, Å. K., Faridani, O. R., Sagasser, S., Winberg, G., & Sandberg, R. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2639 · Cited by 2,358 · see citing works
JASPAR 2020: update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles
Fornes, O., Castro-Mondragon, J. A., Khan, A., van der Lee, R., Zhang, X., Richmond, P. A., Modi, B. P., Correard, S., Gheorghe, M., Baranašić, D., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1001 · Cited by 1,763 · see citing works
Determination and Inference of Eukaryotic Transcription Factor Sequence Specificity
Weirauch, M. T., Yang, A. W. H., Albu, M., Coté, A. G., Montenegro‐Montero, A., Drewe, P., Najafabadi, H. S., Lambert, S. A., Mann, I. K., Cook, K. B., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.009 · Cited by 1,705 · see citing works
chromVAR: inferring transcription-factor-associated accessibility from single-cell epigenomic data
Schep, A. N., Wu, B., Buenrostro, J. D., & Greenleaf, W. J. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4401 · Cited by 1,680 · see citing works
ArchR is a scalable software package for integrative single-cell chromatin accessibility analysis
Granja, J. M., Corces, M. R., Pierce, S. E., Bagdatli, S. T., Choudhry, H., Chang, H. Y., & Greenleaf, W. J. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00790-6 · Cited by 1,392 · see citing works
Corces, M. R., Buenrostro, J. D., Wu, B., Greenside, P. G., Chan, S. M., Koenig, J. L., Snyder, M. P., Pritchard, J. K., Kundaje, A., Greenleaf, W. J., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3646 · Cited by 1,151 · see citing works
Genome-Wide Quantitative Enhancer Activity Maps Identified by STARR-seq
Arnold, C. D., Gerlach, D., Stelzer, C., Boryń, Ł. M., Rath, M., & Stark, A. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232542 · Cited by 1,125 · see citing works
Transcriptional Heterogeneity and Lineage Commitment in Myeloid Progenitors
Paul, F., Arkin, Y., Giladi, A., Jaitin, D. A., Kenigsberg, E., Keren-Shaul, H., Winter, D., Lara-Astiaso, D., Gury, M., Weiner, A., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.013 · Cited by 1,082 · see citing works
A single-cell molecular map of mouse gastrulation and early organogenesis
Pijuan-Sala, B., Griffiths, J. A., Guibentif, C., Hiscock, T. W., Jawaid, W., Calero-Nieto, F. J., Mulas, C., Ibarra-Soria, X., Tyser, R. C. V., Ho, D. L. L., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0933-9 · Cited by 1,033 · see citing works
Satpathy, A. T., Granja, J. M., Yost, K. E., Qi, Y., Meschi, F., McDermott, G. P., Olsen, B. N., Mumbach, M. R., Pierce, S. E., Corces, M. R., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0206-z · Cited by 980 · see citing works
Densely Interconnected Transcriptional Circuits Control Cell States in Human Hematopoiesis
Novershtern, N., Subramanian, A., Lawton, L. N., Mak, R. H., Haining, W. N., McConkey, M. E., Habib, N., Yosef, N., Chang, C. Y., Shay, T., et al. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.004 · Cited by 942 · see citing works
ggseqlogo: a versatile R package for drawing sequence logos
Wagih, O. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx469 · Cited by 933 · see citing works
Human haematopoietic stem cell lineage commitment is a continuous process
Velten, L., Haas, S. F., Raffel, S., Blaszkiewicz, S., Islam, S., Hennig, B. P., Hirche, C., Lutz, C., Buss, E. C., Nowak, D., et al. (2017) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3493 · Cited by 925 · see citing works
Self-citationKulakovskiy, I. V., Vorontsov, I. E., Yevshin, I., Sharipov, R., Fedorova, A. D., Rumynskiy, E. I., Medvedeva, Y. A., Magana-Mora, A., Bajić, V. B., Papatsenko, D., et al. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1106 · Cited by 921 · see citing works
Baccin, C., Al-Sabah, J., Velten, L., Helbling, P. M., Grünschläger, F., Hernández-Malmierca, P., Nombela‐Arrieta, C., Steinmetz, L. M., Trumpp, A., & Haas, S. F. (2019) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-019-0439-6 · Cited by 858 · see citing works
Self-citationCicero predicts cis-regulatory DNA interactions from single-cell chromatin accessibility data
Pliner, H. A., Packer, J. S., McFaline-Figueroa, J. L., Cusanovich, D. A., Daza, R. M., Aghamirzaie, D., Srivatsan, S., Qiu, X., Jackson, D., Minkina, A., et al. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.044 · Cited by 789 · see citing works
scmap: projection of single-cell RNA-seq data across data sets
(2018) · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4644 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
Lineage tracing on transcriptional landscapes links state to fate during differentiation
Weinreb, C., Rodriguez-Fraticelli, A., Camargo, F. D., & Klein, A. M. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw3381 · Cited by 730 · cited 5× · see citing works
“37,39 We included an identical set of 270 sequences containing Trp53 binding sites into all libraries.”
InfluentialWilson, N. K., Foster, S. D., Wang, X., Knezevic, K., Schütte, J., Kaimakis, P., Chilarska, P. M., Kinston, S., Ouwehand, W. H., Dzierzak, E., et al. (2010) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.016 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Purhonen, J., Banerjee, R., McDonald, A. E., Fellman, V., & Kallijärvi, J. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa516 · Cited by 657 · see citing works
Negative effect of the transcriptional activator GAL4
Gill, G., & Ptashne, M. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/334721a0 · Cited by 648 · see citing works
Multilineage Transcriptional Priming and Determination of Alternate Hematopoietic Cell Fates
Laslo, P., Spooner, C. J., Warmflash, A., Lancki, D. W., Lee, H.-J., Sciammas, R., Gantner, B. N., Dinner, A. R., & Singh, H. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.052 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
Chai-1: Decoding the molecular interactions of life
Discovery, C., Boitreaud, J., Dent, J., McPartlon, M., Meier, J., Reis, V., Rogozhnikov, A., & Wu, K. (2024) · doi:10.1101/2024.10.10.615955 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
Single-cell multiomic analysis identifies regulatory programs in mixed-phenotype acute leukemia
Granja, J. M., Klemm, S., McGinnis, L. M., Kathiria, A. S., Mezger, A., Corces, M. R., Parks, B., Gars, E., Liedtke, M., Zheng, G. X. Y., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0332-7 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Negative cross-talk between hematopoietic regulators: GATA proteins repress PU.1
Zhang, P., Behre, G., Pan, J., Iwama, A., Wara-aswapati, N., Radomska, H. S., Auron, P. E., Tenen, D. G., & Sun, Z. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.15.8705 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Sharon, E., Kalma, Y., Sharp, A., Raveh-Sadka, T., Levo, M., Zeevi, D., Keren, L., Yakhini, Z., Weinberger, A., & Segal, E. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2205 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Transcriptional control of granulocyte and monocyte development
Friedman, A. D. (2007) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210764 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Long-term ex vivo haematopoietic-stem-cell expansion allows nonconditioned transplantation
Wilkinson, A. C., Ishida, R., Kikuchi, M., Sudo, K., Morita, M., Crisostomo, R. V., Yamamoto, R., Loh, K. M., Nakamura, Y., Watanabe, M., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1244-x · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Global reference mapping of human transcription factor footprints
Vierstra, J., Lazar, J., Sandstrom, R., Halow, J., Lee, K., Bates, D., Diegel, M., Dunn, D., Neri, F., Haugen, E., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2528-x · Cited by 386 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In some cases, we found statistically weak evidence for stronger correlations with other factors from the same motif family, 45 e.g., the activity of enhancers with Gfi1 sites was correlated with the expression of Gfi1b (Figure S3C).”
Population snapshots predict early haematopoietic and erythroid hierarchies
Tusi, B. K., Wolock, S. L., Weinreb, C., Hwang, Y., Hidalgo, D., Zilionis, R., Waisman, A., Huh, J. R., Klein, A. M., & Socolovsky, M. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25741 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Dahl, R., Walsh, J. C., Lancki, D., Laslo, P., Iyer, S. R., Singh, H., & Simon, M. C. (2003) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni973 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
TFBSTools: an R/bioconductor package for transcription factor binding site analysis
Tan, G., & Lenhard, B. (2016) · Bioinform. · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw024 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Dulken, B. W., Leeman, D. S., Boutet, S. C., Hebestreit, K., & Brunet, A. (2017) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.060 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
RUNX1 and GATA-1 coexpression and cooperation in megakaryocytic differentiation.
Elagib, K. E., Racke, F. K., Mogass, M., Khetawat, R., Delehanty, L. L., & Goldfarb, A. N. (2003) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2002-09-2708 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Inoue, F., Kircher, M., Martin, B., Cooper, G. M., Witten, D. M., McManus, M. T., Ahituv, N., & Shendure, J. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.212092.116 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Chromatin Position Effects Assayed by Thousands of Reporters Integrated in Parallel
Akhtar, W., de Jong, J., Pindyurin, A. V., Pagie, L., Meuleman, W. R. A., de Ridder, J., Berns, A. J. M., Wessels, L. F. A., van Lohuizen, M., & van Steensel, B. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.018 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Kheradpour, P., Ernst, J., Melnikov, A., Rogov, P., Wang, L., Zhang, X., Alston, J., Mikkelsen, T. S., & Kellis, M. (2013) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.144899.112 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Shape constrained additive models
Pya, N., & Wood, S. N. (2015) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/s11222-013-9448-7 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Rubin, A. J., Parker, K. R., Satpathy, A. T., Qi, Y., Wu, B., Ong, A. J., Mumbach, M. R., Ji, A. L., Kim, D. S., Cho, S. W., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.022 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Analysis of combinatorial cis-regulation in synthetic and genomic promoters
Gertz, J., Siggia, E. D., & Cohen, B. A. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07521 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Deciphering eukaryotic gene-regulatory logic with 100 million random promoters
de Boer, C. G., Vaishnav, E. D., Sadeh, R., Abeyta, E. L., Friedman, N., & Regev, A. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0315-8 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Pongubala, J. M. R., Northrup, D. L., Lancki, D. W., Medina, K. L., Treiber, T., Bertolino, E., Thomas, M., Grosschedl, R., Allman, D., & Singh, H. (2008) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1555 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
A Precarious Balance: Pluripotency Factors as Lineage Specifiers
Loh, K. M., & Lim, B. (2011) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2011.03.013 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Shrikumar, A., Tian, K., Avsec, Ž., Shcherbina, A., Banerjee, A., Sharmin, M., Nair, S., & Kundaje, A. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.00416 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
A systematic evaluation of the design and context dependencies of massively parallel reporter assays
Klein, J. C., Agarwal, V., Inoue, F., Keith, A., Martin, B., Kircher, M., Ahituv, N., & Shendure, J. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0965-y · Cited by 226 · see citing works
In pursuit of design principles of regulatory sequences
Levo, M., & Segal, E. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3684 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Sequence determinants of human gene regulatory elements
Sahu, B., Hartonen, T., Pihlajamaa, P., Wei, B., Dave, K., Zhu, F., Kaasinen, E., Lidschreiber, K., Lidschreiber, M., Daub, C. O., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-01009-4 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Triana, S., Vonficht, D., Jopp-Saile, L., Raffel, S., Lutz, R., Leonce, D., Antes, M., Hernández-Malmierca, P., Ordoñez-Rueda, D., Ramasz, B., et al. (2021) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-021-01059-0 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Self-citationHennig, B. P., Velten, L., Racke, I., Szu‐Tu, C., Thoms, M., Rybin, V., Besir, H., Remans, K., & Steinmetz, L. M. (2018) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.117.300257 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Self-citationSpooner, C. J., Cheng, J. X., Pujadas, E., Laslo, P., & Singh, H. (2009) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2009.07.011 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Subtype-specific regulatory network rewiring in acute myeloid leukemia
Assi, S. A., Imperato, M. R., Coleman, D. J. L., Pickin, A., Potluri, S., Ptasinska, A., Chin, P. S., Blair, H., Cauchy, P., James, S. R., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0270-1 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Cell-type-directed design of synthetic enhancers
Taskiran, I. I., Spanier, K. I., Dickmänken, H., Kempynck, N., Pančíková, A., Ekşi, E. C., Hulselmans, G., Ismail, J. N., Theunis, K., Vandepoel, R., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06936-2 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Information integration and energy expenditure in gene regulation
Estrada, J., Wong, F., DePace, A. H., & Gunawardena, J. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.012 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Mutational inactivation of the p53 gene in the human erythroid leukemic K562 cell line
Law, J. C., Ritke, M. K., Yalowich, J. C., Leder, G. H., & Ferrell, R. E. (1993) · Leukemia Research · doi:10.1016/0145-2126(93)90161-d · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Transcriptional repression by the insulator protein CTCF involves histone deacetylases
Lutz, M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.8.1707 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Massively parallel characterization of transcriptional regulatory elements
Agarwal, V., Inoue, F., Schubach, M., Penzar, D., Martin, B. K., Dash, P. M., Keukeleire, P., Zhang, Z., Sohota, A., Zhao, J., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08430-9 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
lentiMPRA and MPRAflow for high-throughput functional characterization of gene regulatory elements
Gordon, M. G., Inoue, F., Martin, B., Schubach, M., Agarwal, V., Whalen, S., Feng, S., Zhao, J., Ashuach, T., Ziffra, R. S., et al. (2020) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-020-0333-5 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Machine-guided design of cell-type-targeting cis-regulatory elements
Gosai, S. J., Castro, R. I., Fuentes, N., Butts, J. C., Mouri, K., Alasoadura, M., Kales, S., Nguyen, T. T. L., Noche, R. R., Rao, A. S., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08070-z · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Velten, L., Story, B. A., Hernández-Malmierca, P., Raffel, S., Leonce, D. R., Milbank, J. H., Paulsen, M. S., Demir, A., Szu‐Tu, C., Frömel, R., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21650-1 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationLarge-scale mapping and mutagenesis of human transcriptional effector domains
DelRosso, N., Tycko, J., Suzuki, P., Andrews, C., Aradhana, Mukund, A., Liongson, I., Ludwig, C., Spees, K., Fordyce, P., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05906-y · Cited by 130 · see citing works
RUNX1 represses the erythroid gene expression program during megakaryocytic differentiation
Kuvardina, O. N., Herglotz, J., Kolodziej, S., Kohrs, N., Herkt, S. C., Wojcik, B., Oellerich, T., Corso, J., Behrens, K., Kumar, A., et al. (2015) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2014-11-610519 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Models of haematopoiesis: seeing the wood for the trees
Ceredig, R. H., Rolink, A. G., & Brown, G. (2009) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2525 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Hosokawa, H., Ungerbäck, J., Wang, X., Matsumoto, M., Nakayama, K. I., Cohen, S. M., Tanaka, T., & Rothenberg, E. V. (2018) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.024 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Gillespie, M. A., Palii, C. G., Sanchez-Taltavull, D., Shannon, P., Longabaugh, W. J. R., Downes, D. J., Sivaraman, K., Espinoza, H. M., Hughes, J. R., Price, N. D., et al. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.03.031 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Hold out the genome: a roadmap to solving the cis-regulatory code
de Boer, C. G., & Taipale, J. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06661-w · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Beneyto-Calabuig, S., Merbach, A. K., Kniffka, J.-A., Antes, M., Szu-Tu, C., Rohde, C., Waclawiczek, A., Stelmach, P., Gräßle, S., Pervan, P., et al. (2023) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2023.04.001 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationTornøe, J., Kusk, P., Johansen, T. E., & Jensen, P. R. (2002) · Gene · doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(02)00878-8 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Zacher, B., Michel, M., Schwalb, B., Cramer, P., Tresch, A., & Gagneur, J. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169249 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Single-molecule imaging of transcription dynamics in somatic stem cells
Wheat, J. C., Sella, Y., Willcockson, M., Skoultchi, A. I., Bergman, A., Singer, R. H., & Steidl, U. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2432-4 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Targeted design of synthetic enhancers for selected tissues in the Drosophila embryo
de Almeida, B. P., Schaub, C., Pagani, M., Secchia, S., Furlong, E. E. M., & Stark, A. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06905-9 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
A Simple Grammar Defines Activating and Repressing cis-Regulatory Elements in Photoreceptors
White, M. A., Kwasnieski, J. C., Myers, C. A., Shen, S. Q., Corbo, J. C., & Cohen, B. A. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.066 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Cockburn, K., Annusver, K., Gonzalez, D. G., Ganesan, S., May, D. P., Mesa, K. R., Kawaguchi, K., Kasper, M., & Greco, V. (2022) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-022-01021-8 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Jindal, K., Adil, M. T., Yamaguchi, N., Yang, X., Wang, H. C., Kamimoto, K., Rivera-Gonzalez, G. C., & Morris, S. A. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01931-4 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Georgakopoulos-Soares, I., Deng, C., Agarwal, V., Chan, C. S. Y., Zhao, J., Inoue, F., & Ahituv, N. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37960-5 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
The same dorsal binding site mediates both activation and repression in a context‐dependent manner.
Pan, D., & Courey, A. J. (1992) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05235.x · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Piras, F., Riba, M., Petrillo, C., Lazarevic, D., Cuccovillo, I., Bartolaccini, S., Stupka, E., Gentner, B., Cittaro, D., Naldini, L., et al. (2017) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.201707922 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Frequent somatic mutations in epigenetic regulators in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia
Togasaki, E., Takeda, J., Yoshida, K., Shiozawa, Y., Takeuchi, M., Oshima, M., Saraya, A., Iwama, A., Yokote, K., Sakaida, E., et al. (2017) · Blood Cancer Journal · doi:10.1038/bcj.2017.36 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Subramanian, S., Thoms, J. A. I., Huang, Y., Cornejo-Páramo, P., Koch, F. C., Jacquelin, S., Shen, S., Song, E., Joshi, S., Brownlee, C., et al. (2023) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.2023021120 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Cofactor squelching: Artifact or fact?
Schmidt, S. F., Larsen, B. D., Loft, A., & Mandrup, S. (2016) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201600034 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Lalanne, J., Regalado, S. G., Domcke, S., Calderon, D., Martin, B., Li, X., Li, T., Suiter, C. C., Lee, C., Trapnell, C., et al. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02260-3 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Interactions between pluripotency factors specify<i>cis</i>-regulation in embryonic stem cells
Fiore, C., & Cohen, B. A. (2016) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.200733.115 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Factors and networks that underpin early hematopoiesis
Mercer, E. M., Lin, Y. C., & Murre, C. (2011) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2011.08.004 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Mukund, A. X., Tycko, J., Allen, S. J., Robinson, S. A., Andrews, C. J., Sinha, J., Ludwig, C., Spees, K. K., Bassik, M. C., & Bintu, L. (2023) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2023.07.001 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Bell, C. C., Balic, J. J., Talarmain, L., Gillespie, A., Scolamiero, L., Lam, E. Y. N., Ang, C.-S., Faulkner, G. J., Gilan, O., & Dawson, M. A. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01749-z · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Martinez-Corral, R., Park, M., Biette, K. M., Friedrich, D., Scholes, C., Khalil, A. S., Gunawardena, J., & DePace, A. H. (2023) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2023.02.003 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationMaicas, M., Vázquez, I., Alis, R., et al. (2017) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms · doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2017.03.007 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
A small regulatory element from chromosome 19 enhances liver-specific gene expression
Li, C., Hirsch, M. L., Carter, P. J., Asokan, A., Zhou, X., Wu, Z., & Samulski, R. J. (2008) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/gt.2008.134 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Nonlinear transcriptional responses to gradual modulation of transcription factor dosage
Domingo, J., Minaeva, M., Morris, J. A., Ghatan, S., Ziosi, M., Sanjana, N. E., & Lappalainen, T. (2024) · doi:10.1101/2024.03.01.582837 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Naqvi, S., Kim, S., Tabatabaee, S., Pampari, A., Kundaje, A., Pritchard, J. K., & Wysocka, J. (2025) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2025.100780 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Emergence of activation or repression in transcriptional control under a fixed molecular context
Martinez-Corral, R., Friedrich, D., Frömel, R., Velten, L., Gunawardena, J., & DePace, A. H. (2024) · doi:10.1101/2024.05.29.596388 · Cited by 18
Self-citationBarr, K. A., & Reinitz, J. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180861 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Emergence of activation or repression in transcriptional control under a fixed molecular context
Martinez-Corral, R., Friedrich, D., Frömel, R., Velten, L., Gunawardena, J., & DePace, A. H. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2413715122 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationBoroujeni, M. E., & Gardaneh, M. (2018) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12033-017-0044-5 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Trans MPRA: A framework for assaying the role of many trans -acting factors at many enhancersPreprint
Calderon, D., Ellis, A., Daza, R. M., Martin, B., Tome, J. M., Chen, W., Chardon, F. M., Leith, A., Lee, C., Trapnell, C., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.09.30.321323 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Ma, X., Ezer, D., Navarro, C., & Adryan, B. (2015) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0666-1 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Multiomic single-cell lineage tracing to dissect fate-specific gene regulatory programsPreprint
Jindal, K., Adil, M. T., Yamaguchi, N., Yang, X., Wang, H. C., Kamimoto, K., Rivera-Gonzalez, G. C., & Morris, S. A. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.10.23.512790 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Tremblay, B. J.-M. (2018) · NCI BioConductor · doi:10.18129/b9.bioc.universalmotif · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Non-linear transcriptional responses to gradual modulation of transcription factor dosage
Domingo, J., Minaeva, M., Morris, J. A., Ghatan, S., Ziosi, M., Sanjana, N. E., & Lappalainen, T. (2024) · doi:10.7554/elife.100555.1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Frömel, R., Rühle, J., Bernal Martinez, A., Szu-Tu, C., Pacheco Pastor, F., Martinez-Corral, R., & Velten, L.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
- Centre for Genomic Regulation (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Velten, Lars
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-06
- Volume
- 188
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3202-3218.e21
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12173716
- OpenAlex
- W4410206253
- Semantic Scholar
- fd755db04cb56af793e94bf133da8577dcbab8cb
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 13
- FWCI
- 8.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation (RYC2021-033860-I, CEX2020-001049-S, PID2019-108082GA-I00, PID2022-142210NA-I00)
- European Regional Development Fund (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033)
- Generalitat de Catalunya
- European Commission
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
- Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MCIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033)
- European Social Fund Plus
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory
- European Research Council
- Government of Catalonia Agency for Administration of University and Research Grants (2023 FI_I 00776)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Keywords
- hematopoiesis, transcription factor binding sites, transcription factor interaction, myeloid differentiation, hematopoietic progenitor cells, synthetic DNA sequences, transcription factor occupancy
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Binding Sites, Cell Differentiation, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Hematopoiesis, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Humans, Transcription Factors, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-27.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-27.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review