CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 184Memory Processes and InfluencesMind wandering and attentionCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Memory failure predicted by attention lapsing and media multitasking

Open access
Madore, Kevin P., Khazenzon, Anna M., Backes, Cameron W., Jiang, Jiefeng, Uncapher, Melina R., Norcia, Anthony M., Wagner, Anthony D.·2020·Nature
DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2870-zPMC PMC7644608
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

With the explosion of digital media and technologies, scholars, educators and the public have become increasingly vocal about the role that an 'attention economy' has in our lives 1. The rise of the current digital culture coincides with longstanding scientific questions about why humans sometimes remember and sometimes forget, and why some individuals remember better than others 2-6. Here we examine whether spontaneous attention lapses-in the moment 7-12, across individuals 13-15 and as a function of everyday media multitasking 16-19-negatively correlate with remembering. Electroencephalography and pupillometry measures of attention 20,21 were recorded as eighty young adults (mean age, 21.7 years) performed a goal-directed episodic encoding and retrieval task 22. Trait-level sustained attention was further quantified using task-based 23 and questionnaire measures 24,25. Using trial-to-trial retrieval data, we show that tonic lapses in attention in the moment before remembering, assayed by posterior alpha power and pupil diameter, were correlated with reductions in neural signals of goal coding and memory, along with behavioural forgetting. Independent measures of trait-level attention lapsing mediated the relationship between neural assays of lapsing and memory performance, and between media multitasking and memory. Attention lapses partially account for why we remember or forget in the moment, and why some individuals remember better than others. Heavier media multitasking is associated with a propensity to have attention lapses and forget.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-020-2870-z

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Green, D. M. & Swets, J. A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (Wiley, 1966).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–175 of 175

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Madore, K. P., Khazenzon, A. M., Backes, C. W., Jiang, J., Uncapher, M. R., Norcia, A. M., & Wagner, A. D.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
  • Madore, Kevin P.
  • Wagner, Anthony D.
ORCID
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-10-28
Volume
587
Issue
7832
Pages
87-91
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/s41586-020-2870-z
PMC
PMC7644608
OpenAlex
W3095623676
Cited by
184
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 1
FWCI
10.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG065255, F32AG059341)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R56MH111672)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
attentional lapses, media multitasking, memory failure, episodic memory, forgetting, sustained attention, pupil size, individual differences in memory, attention economy, digital media
MeSH terms
Memory Consolidation, Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Electroencephalography, Female, Goals, Humans, Male, Memory, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review