Stimulus-specific recruitment of human amygdala neurons predicts episodic memory encoding success
Open accessAbstract
Controlling whether an experience is encoded into long-term memory and thus later remembered is a crucial aspect of memory. Here we examined single-neuron activity in the human brain while participants formed memories for novel visual stimuli and later retrieved them with confidence ratings. Category-selective amygdala neurons exhibited elevated firing during encoding of later remembered items relative to later forgotten items. This effect was predictive of the episodic aspect of the memory, was restricted to the preferred category of each cell, emerged earlier and was stronger in the amygdala compared to the hippocampus, and did not depend on stimulus valence and arousal. Successful memory formation was accompanied by enhanced spike-field coherence between the activity of amygdala category cells and hippocampal field potentials. These findings demonstrate that stimulus-specific recruitment of the amygdala predicts memory formation and suggest category cells in the right amygdala as a target for interventions to treat disorders affecting episodic memory in humans. The study shows that stimulus-specific neurons in the human amygdala determine which experiences become lasting memory, revealing a mechanism that predicts episodic memory formation and may guide future treatments for memory disorders.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Memory engrams: Recalling the past and imagining the future
Josselyn, S. A., & Tonegawa, S. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw4325 · Cited by 1,087 · see citing works
Standing, L. (1973) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/14640747308400340 · Cited by 968 · see citing works
Concept cells: the building blocks of declarative memory functions
Quiroga, R. Q. (2012) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3251 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Impaired declarative memory for emotional material following bilateral amygdala damage in humans.
Adolphs, R., Cahill, L., Schul, R., & Babinsky, R. (1997) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.4.3.291 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Behavioral tagging is a general mechanism of long-term memory formation
Ballarini, F., Moncada, D., Martinez, M. C., Alen, N., & Viola, H. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0907078106 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Persistently active neurons in human medial frontal and medial temporal lobe support working memory
Kamiński, J., Sullivan, S., Chung, J. M., Ross, I. B., Mamelak, A. N., & Rutishauser, U. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4509 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Self-citationMemory failure predicted by attention lapsing and media multitasking
Madore, K. P., Khazenzon, A. M., Backes, C. W., Jiang, J., Uncapher, M. R., Norcia, A. M., & Wagner, A. D. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2870-z · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Representation of retrieval confidence by single neurons in the human medial temporal lobe
Rutishauser, U., Ye, S., Koroma, M., Tudusciuc, O., Ross, I. B., Chung, J. M., & Mamelak, A. N. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4041 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Self-citationKensinger, E. A., Addis, D. R., & Atapattu, R. K. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.017 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Gonzalez‐Rodriguez, M., Villar‐Conde, S., Astillero‐Lopez, V., Villanueva‐Anguita, P., Ubeda‐Banon, I., Flores‐Cuadrado, A., Martinez‐Marcos, A., & Saiz‐Sanchez, D. (2023) · Brain Pathology · doi:10.1111/bpa.13180 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Xiao, J., Daume, J., Salimpour, Y., Kurilenko, N., Mosher, C., Anderson, W. S., Valiante, T. A., Mamelak, A. N., & Rutishauser, U.
- Affiliations
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rutishauser, Ueli
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2026-10-27
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W7223989301
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS117839)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- amygdala, episodic memory encoding, single-unit activity, hippocampus, spike-field coherence, memory confidence, stimulus valence, memory disorders, human brain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review