CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 72

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reduced reproductive success is associated with selective constraint on human genes

Gardner, Eugene J., Neville, Matthew D. C., Samocha, Kaitlin E., Barclay, Kieron, Kolk, Martin, Niemi, Mari E. K., Kirov, George, Martin, Hilary C., Hurles, Matthew E.·2022·Nature
DOI 10.1038/s41586-022-04549-9

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-022-04549-9

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. Lek, M. et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature 536, 285–291 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Cassa, C. A. et al. Estimating the selective effects of heterozygous protein-truncating variants from human exome data. Nat. Genet. 49, 806–810 (2017). · DOI
  3. Collins, R. L. et al. A structural variation reference for medical and population genetics. Nature 581, 444–451 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Weghorn, D. et al. Applicability of the mutation-selection balance model to population genetics of heterozygous protein-truncating variants in humans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 36, 1701–1710 (2019). · DOI
  5. Darwin, C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (A. L. Burt, 1874); https://doi-org.ezp.lib.cam.ac.uk/10.5962/bhl.title.16749 · DOI
  6. Ganna, A. et al. Ultra-rare disruptive and damaging mutations influence educational attainment in the general population. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1563–1565 (2016). · DOI
  7. Männik, K. et al. Copy number variations and cognitive phenotypes in unselected populations. JAMA 313, 2044–2054 (2015). · DOI
  8. Huguet, G. et al. Measuring and estimating the effect sizes of copy number variants on general intelligence in community-based samples. JAMA Psychiatry 75, 447–457 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Ganna, A. et al. Quantifying the impact of rare and ultra-rare coding variation across the phenotypic spectrum. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 102, 1204–1211 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Sudlow, C. et al. UK Biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 12, e1001779 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Szustakowski, J. D. et al. Advancing human genetics research and drug discovery through exome sequencing of the UK Biobank. Nat. Genet. 53, 942–948 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Barthold, J. A., Myrskylä, M. & Jones, O. R. Childlessness drives the sex difference in the association between income and reproductive success of modern Europeans. Evol. Hum. Behav. 33, 628–638 (2012). · DOI
  13. Oud, M. S. et al. A systematic review and standardized clinical validity assessment of male infertility genes. Hum. Reprod. 34, 932–941 (2019). · DOI
  14. Lopes, A. M. et al. Human spermatogenic failure purges deleterious mutation load from the autosomes and both sex chromosomes, including the gene DMRT1. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003349 (2013). · DOI
  15. Skjaerven, R., Wilcox, A. J. & Lie, R. T. A population-based study of survival and childbearing among female subjects with birth defects and the risk of recurrence in their children. N. Engl. J. Med. 340, 1057–1062 (1999). · DOI
  16. Lie, R. T., Wilcox, A. J. & Skjaerven, R. Survival and reproduction among males with birth defects and risk of recurrence in their children. JAMA 285, 755–760 (2001). · DOI
  17. Power, R. A. et al. Fecundity of patients with schizophrenia, autism, bipolar disorder, depression, anorexia nervosa, or substance abuse vs their unaffected siblings. JAMA Psychiatry 70, 22–30 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Allen, M. S. The role of personality in sexual and reproductive health. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 28, 581–586 (2019). · DOI
  19. Buss, D. M. et al. International preferences in selecting mates: a study of 37 cultures. J. Cross. Cult. Psychol. 21, 5–47 (1990). · DOI
  20. Pawłowski, B. & Dunbar, R. I. Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions. Proc. Biol. Sci. 266, 281–285 (1999). · DOI
  21. Buss, D. M. & Schmitt, D. P. Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 70, 77–110 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Fieder, M., Huber, S. & Bookstein, F. L. Socioeconomic status, marital status and childlessness in men and women: an analysis of census data from six countries. J. Biosoc. Sci. 43, 619–635 (2011). · DOI
  23. Nettle, D. & Pollet, T. V. Natural selection on male wealth in humans. Am. Nat. 172, 658–666 (2008). · DOI
  24. Fieder, M. & Huber, S. The effects of sex and childlessness on the association between status and reproductive output in modern society. Evol. Hum. Behav. 28, 392–398 (2007). · DOI
  25. GTEx Consortium. The Genotype–Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat. Genet. 45, 580–585 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  26. Bateman, A. J. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2, 349–368 (1948). · DOI · Paper page
  27. Parker, G. A. & Pizzari, T. in Current Perspectives on Sexual Selection 119–163 (Springer, 2015). · DOI
  28. Kolk, M. & Barclay, K. Cognitive ability and fertility among Swedish men born 1951-1967: evidence from military conscription registers. Proc. Biol. Sci. 286, 20190359 (2019).
  29. Davis, K. A. S. et al. Mental health in UK Biobank—development, implementation and results from an online questionnaire completed by 157,366 participants: a reanalysis. BJPsych Open 6, e18 (2020). · DOI
  30. Fry, A. et al. Comparison of sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of UK Biobank participants with those of the general population. Am. J. Epidemiol. 186, 1026–1034 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  31. Watanabe, K. et al. A global overview of pleiotropy and genetic architecture in complex traits. Nat. Genet. 51, 1339–1348 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  32. Barban, N. et al. Genome-wide analysis identifies 12 loci influencing human reproductive behavior. Nat. Genet. 48, 1462–1472 (2016). · DOI
  33. Verweij, R. M. et al. Sexual dimorphism in the genetic influence on human childlessness. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 25, 1067–1074 (2017). · DOI
  34. Clark, D. W. et al. Associations of autozygosity with a broad range of human phenotypes. Nat. Commun. 10, 4957 (2019). · DOI
  35. Stanley, K. E. et al. Causal genetic variants in stillbirth. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 1107–1116 (2020). · DOI
  36. Kaplanis, J. et al. Evidence for 28 genetic disorders discovered by combining healthcare and research data. Nature 586, 757–762 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  37. Costain, G., Chow, E. W. C., Silversides, C. K. & Bassett, A. S. Sex differences in reproductive fitness contribute to preferential maternal transmission of 22q11.2 deletions. J. Med. Genet. 48, 819–824 (2011). · DOI
  38. Betzig, L. Means, variances, and ranges in reproductive success: comparative evidence. Evol. Hum. Behav. 33, 309–317 (2012). · DOI
  39. Bycroft, C. et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature 562, 203–209 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  40. Wang, K. et al. PennCNV: an integrated hidden Markov model designed for high-resolution copy number variation detection in whole-genome SNP genotyping data. Genome Res. 17, 1665–1674 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  41. Macé, A. et al. New quality measure for SNP array based CNV detection. Bioinformatics 32, 3298–3305 (2016). · DOI
  42. Liaw, A. & Wiener, M. Classification and regression by randomforest. R News 2, 285 (2002).
  43. Di Angelantonio, E. et al. Efficiency and safety of varying the frequency of whole blood donation (INTERVAL): a randomised trial of 45,000 donors. Lancet 390, 2360–2371 (2017). · DOI
  44. Fromer, M. et al. Discovery and statistical genotyping of copy-number variation from whole-exome sequencing depth. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 91, 597–607 (2012). · DOI
  45. Backenroth, D. et al. CANOES: detecting rare copy number variants from whole exome sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e97 (2014). · DOI
  46. Packer, J. S. et al. CLAMMS: a scalable algorithm for calling common and rare copy number variants from exome sequencing data. Bioinformatics 32, 133–135 (2016). · DOI
  47. Crawford, K. et al. Medical consequences of pathogenic CNVs in adults: analysis of the UK Biobank. J. Med. Genet. 56, 131–138 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  48. McLaren, W. et al. The Ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol. 17, 122 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  49. Rentzsch, P., Schubach, M., Shendure, J. & Kircher, M. CADD-splice-improving genome-wide variant effect prediction using deep learning-derived splice scores. Genome Med. 13, 31 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  50. Karczewski, K. J. et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 581, 434–443 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  51. Zhao, H. et al. CrossMap: a versatile tool for coordinate conversion between genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 30, 1006–1007 (2014). · DOI
  52. Kersey, P. J. et al. Ensembl Genomes 2016: more genomes, more complexity. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D574–D580 (2016). · DOI
  53. Van Hout, C. V. et al. Exome sequencing and characterization of 49,960 individuals in the UK Biobank. Nature 586, 749–756 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  54. Nait Saada, J. et al. Identity-by-descent detection across 487,409 British samples reveals fine scale population structure and ultra-rare variant associations. Nat. Commun. 11, 6130 (2020). · DOI
  55. Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  56. Carlstedt, B. Cognitive Abilities—Aspects of Structure, Process and Measurement. Doctoral thesis, Univ. of Gothenburg (2000).
  57. Hällsten, M. Inequality across three and four generations in egalitarian Sweden: 1st and 2nd cousin correlations in socio-economic outcomes. Res. Soc. Stratif. Mobil. 35, 19–33 (2014).
  58. Mårdberg, B. & Carlstedt, B. Swedish Enlistment Battery (SEB): construct validity and latent variable estimation of cognitive abilities by the CAT‐SEB. Int. J. Sel. 6, 107–114 (1998).
  59. Rönnlund, M., Carlstedt, B., Blomstedt, Y., Nilsson, L.-G. & Weinehall, L. Secular trends in cognitive test performance: Swedish conscript data 1970–1993. Intelligence 41, 19–24 (2013). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 72

Metadata

Authors
Gardner, E. J., Neville, M. D. C., Samocha, K. E., Barclay, K., Kolk, M., Niemi, M. E. K., Kirov, G., Martin, H. C., & Hurles, M. E.
ORCID
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2022-03-23
Volume
603
Issue
7903
Pages
858-863
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/s41586-022-04549-9
Cited by
72
References
12
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review